Cases

SUMMARY ORDER AFTER SUBMISSION AND UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Defendant Rafael Zayas appeals from the sentence of the District Court following his conviction upon his plea of guilty to a federal narcotics charges. Zayas claims that the government acted in bad faith when it refused to move for a downward departure pursu

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is VACATED and the cause is REMANDED. On March 30, 1999, defendant-appellant Enrique Zayas pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut to one count of violating the federal narcotics laws. The District Court asked Zayas and his attorney a series of questions,

25 West 24th Street Realty Corp., Petitioner-Appellant, - against againstAnthony Zayas, Calendar No. 16-455 Respondent-Respondent. 25 West 24th Street Realty Corp., Petitioner-Appellant, - Anthony Stanhope, Calendar No. 16-456 Respondent-Respondent. In consolidated appeals, petitioner appeals from three orders of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jack Stoller,

25 West 24th Street Realty Corp., Petitioner-Appellant, - against againstAnthony Zayas, Calendar No. 16-455 Respondent-Respondent. 25 West 24th Street Realty Corp., Petitioner-Appellant, - Anthony Stanhope, Calendar No. 16-456 Respondent-Respondent. In consolidated appeals, petitioner appeals from three orders of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jack Stoller,

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII CARLA E. COLETTI CERTIORARI Procedente del Peticionaria Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala KLCE202400348 San Juan v.

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII BENJAMIN J. BLAD, CERTIORARI KEVIN GAN Y LA Procedente del SOCIEDAD LEGAL DE Tribunal de Primera GANANCIALES Instancia, Sala compuestas por Superior de ambos

OPINION AND ORDER LAFFITTE, District Judge. It may be frightening, but it is true. There exists no statutory provision in Puerto Rico establishing an attorney’s lien on money obtained in a judgment or settlement. Cornier v. Superior Court, 96 P.R.R. 246 (1968); Martinez v. Hernandez, 456 F.2d 262, 264 (1st Cir.1972). The prior existence of a valid contingent fee agreement between attorney

Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-18-2002 Zayas v. INS Precedential or Non-Precedential

46 So.3d 1141 (2010) KFC/YUM! BRANDS and Gallagher Bassett Services, Appellants, v. Benjamin MOORE, Appellee. No. 1D10-0599. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 29, 2010. *1142 Jennifer S. Haley-Gleason and Phillip Monte of the Law Offices Harbsmeier DeZayas, LLP, Tallahassee, for Appellants. Bill

[Cite as Dumais v. Cincinnati Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr., 2024-Ohio-1022.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO PAUL DUMAIS, : APPEAL NOS. C-230190 C-230191 Plaintiff-Appellant, : TRIAL NO. A-2100924 vs.

[Cite as Feagan v. Bethesda N. Hosp., 2024-Ohio-166.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO GLENN D. FEAGAN, ESQ., : APPEAL NO. C-230135 TRIAL NO. A-2202163 Appellant, : and : KAREN LINGO, et al.,

PER CURIAM. *98Notwithstanding the well intended motive of the trial judge1, it is beyond peradventure that he erred in entering his amended final judgment, which for all intent and purpose, created a new lease agreement between the parties. Cf. City of Miami Beach v. Frankel, 363 So.2d 555 (Fla. 1978). However, our review

[Cite as Brew v. Brew, 2023-Ohio-1457.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO MERCY BREW, : APPEAL NO. C-220140 TRIAL NO. DR-2001217 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : O P I N I O N. BENJAMIN BREW, : Defendant-

[Cite as Densler v. Durrani, 2024-Ohio-14.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO BETHANY DENSLER, Administrator : APPEAL NO. C-230016 of the Estate of Robert Densler, TRIAL NO. A-1706561 Plaintiff-Appellee, : O P I N I O N. vs.

[Cite as Jones v. Durrani, 2024-Ohio-1776.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JOAN JONES, : APPEAL NO. C-220426 TRIAL NO. A-1706486 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : ABUBAKAR ATIQ DURRANI, M.D.,

[Cite as S&T Bank, Inc. v. Advance Merchant Servs., 2024-Ohio-4757.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO S&T BANK, INC., : APPEAL NO. C-230448 TRIAL NO. A-2102471 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. : O P I N I O

[Cite as Janson v. Durrani, 2021-Ohio-1467.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO TRACY JANSON, : APPEAL NO. C-200047 TRIAL NO. A-1505049 and : PAMELA JANSON, : O P I N I O N. Plaintiffs-Appellants,

[Cite as Janson v. Christ Hosp., Inc., 2021-Ohio-1467.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO TRACY JANSON, : APPEAL NO. C-200047 TRIAL NO. A-1505049 and : PAMELA JANSON, : O P I N I O N. Plaintif

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Orders, each entered March 21, 2016, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs. The summary judgment record establishes that petitioner, the operator of a single room occupancy (SRO) facility located at 25 West 24th Street in Manhattan, entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU), dated October 31, 2013, with the City of New York, acting through the Departm

People v Hernandez (2022 NY Slip Op 05544) People v Hernandez 2022 NY Slip Op 05544 Decided on October 5, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.