Cases

Karen LeCraft Henderson, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs, both Palestinian nationals and Palestinian Americans, claim the defendants, pro-Israeli American individuals and entities, are conspiring to expel all non-Jews from territory whose sovereignty is in dispute. 1 They sued in federal district court, pressi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement Discovery, filed June 7, 2012 (Doc. 42)(“Motion to Supplement”). The Court held a hearing on July 12, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiffs David Montoya and Michael Montoya have shown good cause to modify discovery deadlines, agreed to in the Jo

SHELDON, J. In this appeal from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to his minor daughter, Unique R., the respondent father, Samuel M., 1 claims that the court erred in concluding, as required to support a judgment of termination under General Statutes § 17a-112(j)(1),

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Ware v. Sheldon, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1768.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215,

ORDER D.E. ABRAM, United States Magistrate. The plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Order of Payment of Fees of Harold Katz. Mr. Katz has been designated as an expert witness for the plaintiffs. Defendant deposed Mr. Katz on October 25, 1989. At that deposition Mr. Katz produced numerous documents that had been requested by the defendant. Plaintiff has now filed a motion requesting that the defendant be or

12/21/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 1, 2022 MARK SEYBOLD, ET AL. v. SHELDON J. METZ, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cannon County No. 17-67 J. Mark Rogers, Judge ________

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ First Motion In Limine, filed September 4, 2012 (Doc. 55) (“Motion in Limine”). The Court held a hearing on September 19, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should allow Defendants to cross-examine Plaintiff Michael Montoya about past traffic violations for th

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0136p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BENJAMIN STANLEY, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

BEAR, J. The plaintiff, Natasha B., appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her appeal from the decision of a hearing officer of the defendant, the Department of Children and Families (department), who upheld the department's decision to substantiate allegations of physical abuse, physical neglect, and emotional neglect by the plaintiff against a minor child and to place

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-KA-00202-COA KENNARD R. NICHOLS A/K/A KENNARD APPELLANT RAYMOND NICHOLS A/K/A KEN NICHOLS A/K/A KEN R. NICHOLS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/12/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARK SHELDON DUNCAN COURT FROM WHICH APP

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1793 Doc: 59 Filed: 03/13/2026 Pg: 1 of 38 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1793 UNITED STATES EX REL. DEBORAH SHELDON, Executrix of the Estate of Troy Sheldon, United States of America, ex rel.,

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

49 B.R. 900 (1985) In re DeLOREAN MOTOR COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, Debtor. David W. ALLARD, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy, Plaintiff, v. Robert Weld BENJAMIN; Van Ginkel & Benjamin, a partnership; Henry I. Bushkin; Cristina Ferrare DeLorean, a/k/a Cynthia Cristina Ferrare, individually and as trustee u/t/a dated July 29, 1982, as amended January 25, 1983; Mary Jacqueline Feddock; Ted M. Gans; Thomas W. Kimmerly, individually and as tru

Opinion SHELDON, J. The plaintiff, MacDermid, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing three counts 1 of its complaint against the defendants, Cook-son Group, PLC, Cookson Electronics, Inc., and Enthone, Inc., on the basis of the prior pending action doctrine.

191 B.R. 39 (1996) In re DONALD SHELDON & CO., INC., Debtor. Don L. HORWITZ, Trustee for the Liquidation of Donald Sheldon & Co., Inc., Plaintiff, v. Donald SHELDON, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 85-6538 AJG. Adv. 89-6256 AJG. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. January 2, 1996. As Corrected January 17, 1996.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. DelMonico v. Traynor, 116 So.3d 1205, 1212 (Fla.2013); Fink v. Oshins, P.3d 640, 644 (Nev.2002); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 587 (1977).

Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge Sir Winston Churchill said, "To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often." It is in the spirit of this concept that I change my prior holding in this matter, in light of recent appellate court precedent.1 The ultimate outcome of this case, however, remains unchanged. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, R

ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS, Judge. Brian Jeffrey Turner (“Turner”) appeals the rulings of the Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria (the “circuit court”) 1) declining Turner’s motion to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant obtained as a result of a Global Positioning System (“GPS”) tracking device, 2) admitting photographs of mail addressed to Turner as evidence at

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge: DSC Communications appeals the district court’s refusal to aggregate damages awarded to it by a jury for diversion of corporate opportunity and misappropriation of trade secrets, as well as the district court’s denial of attorneys’ fees. Next Level Communications cross appeals on numerous grounds, alleging that DSC’s claims fail, that certain evidence was im

Military Discharge; Judgment on the Administrative Record; Legal Hold; Retirement; Drop from Rolls; Military Control; Supervised Release; SECNA-VINST 1620.6C. OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge. This military pay case comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the Administrative Record (“AR”). Plaintiff chall