Cases

NOS. 12-18-00300-CR 12-18-00301-CR 12-18-00302-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS BENJAMIN CARROLL MOORE, § APPEALS FROM THE 159TH APPELLANT V.

GD 11-025068 (Allegheny) Affirmed

GD 11-025068 (Allegheny) Affirmed

PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

GD 11-025068 (Allegheny) Affirmed

GD 11-025068 (Allegheny) Affirmed

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Sep 26 2019, 8:58 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeal

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT DANIEL J. SPELLMAN AND MARGARET : No. 362 WAL 2017 SPELLMAN, : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court : v. :

Writ denied. Stay denied.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Dillon, J.), dated June 23, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, granted that part of plaintiffs cross motion seeking a determination that the law of New York applies to the action. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Motion to vacate the order of this Court denied. Present—Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.

Opinion filed July 13, 2006

ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I concur only in the result of the order that denies the petition for mandamus.

Petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the judgment in the light of plaintiffs February 5, 2002, receipt of Patent No. U.S. 6,343,934 B1 for his “Mural in a Can.” Jurisdiction is not retained.

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Chief Justice, dissenting. The City of St. Louis can prove that multiple paint manufacturers sold lead-based paint in the city. The lead in the paint in buildings throughout the city is a poisonous nuisance that is a threat to public health and needs to be cleaned up. The city, however, cannot prove which lead-poisoned buildings have Benjamin Moore paints, which buildings have Sherwin-Williams

788 A.2d 906 (2002) 347 N.J. Super. 71 Theodore JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. BENJAMIN MOORE & COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and Peter Bishop and Ellen Singer, Defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 3, 2001. Decided January 28, 2002.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ June 16, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A16D0399. HOLLY WILSON et al. v. BENJAMIN MOORE. Holly Wilson gave birth to a daughter on September 12, 2011. Benjamin Moore, the child’s biological father, subsequently petitioned to legitimate the child and establish custodial rights. The trial court grante

574 N.W.2d 887 (1998) 1998 SD 14 Merle D. LEWIS and Barb Lewis, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BENJAMIN MOORE & COMPANY and Passmore Building Center and Benjamin Moore Paint Distributor, Inc., Defendants and Appellees. No. 20057. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs January 14, 1998. Decided February 18, 1998.

|&7¥-/¥ ELECTRONIC RECORD Driving while COA# 04-14-00679-CR OFFENSE: Intoxicated 3rd Benjamin Alley Moore v. The STYLE: state of Texas COUNTY: Bexar COA DISPOSITION: TRIAL COURT: 186th District Court DATE: 11/26/2014

Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court. Because of the scientific uncertainties inherent in pinpointing the onset and course of progressive environmental injury, tradi*91tional liability insurance contract language did not resolve the question of when an “occurrence” takes place in that context. In Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance C