Cases

ROBERT M. MURPHY, Judge. \ STATEMENT of the case This is defendant’s second appeal. Defendant was convicted of aggravated rape of a juvenile in violation of La. R.S. 14:42 (count one) and molestation of a juvenile in violation of La. R.S. 14:81.2 (count two). On count one, the trial court sentenced defendant to life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation,

814 F.2d 883 ALFARO MOTORS, INC., and Richard Alfaro, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Hon. Benjamin WARD, as Police Commissioner of the City ofNew York, the City of New York Police Department, andAnthony Savarese, individually and as a Sergeant in the NewYork City Police Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 785, Docket 86-7976. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit.

PIERCE, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants, Richard Alfaro and Alfaro Motors, Inc., appeal from an order entered on November 3, 1986, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Keenan, Judge), granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and from a judgment entered on November 14, 1986, dismissing appellants’ civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court held

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00238-CR __________________ LOUIS BENJAMIN GALYNSKY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________

PER CURIAM. The question presented in this diversity action is whether, or under what circumstances, a retail store’s failure to assist a customer in a timely manner can give rise to a negligence claim under New York law. Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) appeals from a judgment, entered following a jury trial, of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Charles J. Siragusa, Judge)

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 8, 2014 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SILIO HILERIO-ALFARO, PABLO CHAVEZ, AND ISIDRO PEREZ Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 12-03269 Honorable Bernie Weinman, Judge No. W2013-01819-CCA-R3-CD © - Filed November 19, 2014 The Defendant-Appellant, S

Per Curiam. Affirmed . See Hart v. State , 246 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (en banc). We again certify conflict with Cuevas v. State , 241 So.3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ;

Per Curiam. The defendant appeals the circuit court's denial of his motion for resentencing hearing, challenging the thirty-year sentences imposed following convictions for second degree murder and robbery. We affirm based on Hart v. State , 246 So.3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (en banc) and Ped

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ISIAH JERMAINE CORBETT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-1654 [August 29, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial C

606 F.Supp. 1100 (1985) Santiago ALFARO and Araraquara Citrus, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY, INC. Civ. A. No. 84-3276. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 1, 1985. *1101 *1102 *1103

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BRYAN C. DONAHUE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-2148 [November 7, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Cour

Per Curiam. *771Affirmed . See Hart v. State , 246 So.3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (en banc). Although two members of this panel dissented in Hart , we affirm because we are bound by Hart ,

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT AVION LAWSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-3671 [August 22, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fiftee

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LINDA PEDROZA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-2151 [May 30, 2018] Appeal of order denying 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Cir

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 1, 1966, modified (1) by striking therefrom all the ordering provisions except the last and (2) by substituting therefor provisions (a) granting plaintiff’s motion for a severance and a separate trial of the third-party action and for an immediate trial of the main action and (b) setting the main action down for trial at the head of the Beady Day Calendar on January 9, 1967. As so modified, order affi

Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JAMES WARTHEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-961 [February 27, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteent

MORENO, J. I concur. The majority opinion addresses primarily the limitations on the power of local officials to disobey statutes that may be, but have not yet been judicially established to be, unconstitutional. I write separately to focus on the related but distinct question of what courts should do when confronted with such disobedience on the part of local officials. As the

*283OPINION OF THE COURT Rosenberger, J. P. The instant class action was brought by public assistance recipients who have been classified as “employable with limitations” (E-II) due to medical problems and who have been assigned to the City’s mandatory Work Experience Program (WEP) as a condition of receiving benefits. Plaintiffs allege that the City

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the third-party defendant, Benjamin Vinar, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered June 4, 2008, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion of the third-