Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-UR-01108-SCT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY, INC. v. MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND THOMAS A. BLANTON DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/22/2012 TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: BEN HARRY STONE RICKY J. COX MICHAEL ADELMAN CHRISTA R. BISHOP C. STEPHEN STACK SHAW

PIERCE, Justice, specially concurring: ¶ 29. I concur with the majority decision, but I write separately to provide additional analysis regarding the interplay between public utility regulation and the subject Base Load Act. In authorizing the Commission to include in an electric utility’s rate base and rates all cost expenditures determined by the Commission to be prudently incurred in connection with a gen

ACCEPTED 15-25-00123-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/25/2025 7:25 PM NO. 15-25-00123-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P

ACCEPTED 15-25-00123-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/25/2025 5:17 PM NO. 15-25-00123-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CT-01502-SCT SHANNON CRAIG PARKER a/k/a SHANNON C. PARKER a/k/a SHANNON PARKER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/27/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JON MARK WEATHERS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: CANDANCE L. RICKMAN BENJAMIN DODD THORNTON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CT-01502-SCT SHANNON CRAIG PARKER a/k/a SHANNON C. PARKER a/k/a SHANNON PARKER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/27/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JON MARK WEATHERS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: CANDANCE L. RICKMAN BENJAMIN DODD THORNTON

LEE, C.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Samuel Terrail Young Jr. was indicted by a Madison County grand jury of one count of sexual battery and one count of burglary. Following a jury trial in the Madison County Circuit Court, the jury found Young guilty of the sexual-battery charge and not guilty of the burglary charge. He was sentenced as a violent habitual offender under Mississippi Code Anno

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-IA-00398-SCT MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER - LEAKE, INC., DAVID MOODY, M.D. AND MADDEN MEDICAL CLINIC, PLLC v. SYLVIA DIANNE HARKINS AND REGGIE HARKINS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/26/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WINSTON L. KIDD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: MICHAEL T. JAQUES BOBBY L. DALLAS C. MAISON HEIDELBER

488 F.Supp.2d 1258 (2007) Melbert Ray FORD, Petitioner, v. Derrick SCHOFIELD, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent. Civil Action File No. 1:01-CV-2595-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. May 11, 2007. *1259 *1260

EYLER, JAMES R., J., concurring and dissenting, in which HOTTEN, J., joins. These consolidated cases arise from the leakage of gasoline from a gasoline service station, located at the corner of Jarrettsville Pike and Paper Mill Road in the Jacksonville area of Baltimore County. The station was owned by Exxon-Mobil Corporation, appellant. The leak occurred, on January 13, 2006, whe

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Ford v. Ruehlman, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-3529.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01133-SCT RAY VIRGIL, BARBARA LLOYD AND CASSANDRA JOHNSON v. SOUTHWEST MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/31/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GEORGE WARD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: WALKER (BILL) JONES, III MICHAEL D. SIMMONS JUSTIN RONALD GLENN HENRY T. HOLI

417 F.Supp.2d 807 (2006) Barbara Haffey BOGY, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of Thomas P. Haffey, A Minor; Mollie Haffey Caldwell; and James L. Haffey, Jr. Plaintiffs v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY; Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.; and Killens Motors, Inc. Defendants. No. CIVA5:01CV116WHB-JMR. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division. February 28, 2006.</

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: The purpose of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667e (1976 & Supp. IV 1980),1 is “to assure a meaningful disclosure of credit terms.” Id. § 1601(a). This purpose would appear to be best served by a succinct and lucid statement that would at once facilitate both the borrower’s understanding and the lender’s compliance. However, altho

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0037p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, │ Peti

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0037p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, │ Peti

679 F.2d 436 Luella WRIGHT and Charlie Wright, Plaintiffs-Appellees-CrossAppellants,Willie Shavers, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.TOWER LOAN OF MISSISSIPPI, INC., d/b/a Tower Loan of Canton,Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee. No. 81-4154 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. June 28, 1982.

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: Appellee, Bessie Harris, filed this suit in the district court alleging a violation of the Truth-in-Lending Act in a loan transaction. The lower court granted Harris’ motion for summary judgment. The judgment can-celled the note and a deed of trust securing the obligation, ordered that appellant, Tower Loan of

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. Several hundred products Lability lawsuits filed in federal court against Ford Motor Company and Bridgestone/Fire-stone North American Tire, LLC (Firestone) concerning the allegedly defective designs of certain models of Firestone tires and the Ford Explorer are currently consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the Southern District of Indiana. <

PER CURIAM: Our prior opinion in this case, First Gibraltar Bank, FSB v. Morales, 19 F.3d 1032 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 204, 130 L.Ed.2d 134 (1994), is vacated and the following is substituted therefor. The issue presented for our determination is whether the Home Owners’ Loan Act,