Cases

998 F.Supp. 1225 (1997) Mario BENAVIDEZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. Civ. 95-0823 LH/WWD. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. July 28, 1997. *1226 Bruce E. Pasternack, Pasternack & Blake, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. Raymond Hamilton, Jan E. Mitchell, Ronald F. Ross, Joan M. Hart,

PER CURIAM. Vanessa Benavidez and Stella Padilla contend that Defendants violated their First Amendment rights by filing a motion in a civil case. The district court dismissed their complaint. For the following reasons, we affirm. I. Background Because Stella Padilla's nominating petition for Albuquerque mayor lacked the r

Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation '00'06- 09:20:16 2021.08.25 Commission IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMCA-029 Filing Date: December 23, 2020 Nos. A-1-CA-36979 and

231 P.3d 1132 (2010) 2010-NMCA-035 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew BENAVIDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 28,636. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. January 29, 2010. Certiorari Denied, March 24, 2010, No. 32,254. *1134 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Francine A. Chavez, Assis

145 P.3d 117 (2006) 2006-NMCA-138 Ivan S. BENAVIDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gina Denise BENAVIDEZ and Richard P. Salgado, Defendants-Appellees. No. 25,750. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. September 13, 2006. *118 Roger Moore, Law Office of Roger Moore, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant. Ronald T. Tayl

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, *1044filed October 21, 2015 (Doc. 7)(the “Motion”); and (ii) the Plaintiffs Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7), Request for Remand, and M

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs First Motion to Compel Production of Documents, filed May 2, 2016 (Doc. 52)(“Motion to Compel”). The Court held a hearing on March 16, 2017. The primary issue is whether the Court should compel Defendant Sandia National Laboratories to produce various items of requested discove

797 F.Supp.2d 1199 (2011) Ed ABREU, Joe Bustos, Richard Gonzales, Tom Mascarenas, Marie Matejka, Albert Pino, Antonio Sanchez, Richard Trujillo, and Robert Valenzuela, Plaintiffs, v. NEW MEXICO CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES DEPARTMENT (CYFD), Dorian Dodson, as an individual and in her official capacity as Secretary of CYFD, New Mexico State Personnel Office, and Sandra Perez, as an individual and in her official capacity as State Personnel Office

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Antonio Sanchez, filed January 31, 2011 (Doc. 49); (ii) the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Robert Valenzuela, filed January 31, 2011 (Doc. 50); (iii) the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Richard Trujillo, filed

979 P.2d 234 (1999) 127 N.M. 189 1999-NMCA-053 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador BENAVIDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 18,699. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. December 23, 1998. Certiorari Granted April 27, 1999. *238 Tom Udall, Attorney General, St

61 F.3d 916 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Bry

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises the issue of whether the intentional tort exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) applies to a suit alleging that a government-employed psychologist negligently mismanaged the patient-therapist relationship by engaging in sexual contact and drug and alcohol abuse with his patient. Concluding that the therapist’s actions constitut

913 P.2d 665 (1995) 121 N.M. 477 Robert COLLYER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 16235. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. December 11, 1995. Eric Morrow, Stafford Law Offices, Raton, for Petitioner-Appellant. Tom Udall, Attorney General, Judith

915 P.2d 336 (1996) 121 N.M. 580 Anderson CARTER, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF LAS CRUCES, New Mexico, and Ruben Smith, in his capacity as Mayor, and Bruno Zaldo, in his official capacity as City Manager, and Herculano Ferralez, Gene Kennon, Jack Valencia, Henry Benavidez, Tommy Tomlin, and John Haltom, in their capacities as City Councilors, Defendants-Appellees. No. 15897.

531 P.2d 957 (1975) 87 N.M. 223 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie BENAVIDEZ, Johnny Jack Romero and Ernest Chavez, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1560. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. January 22, 1975. *959 Michael L. Gregory, Las Vegas, for Louie Benavidez. H.E. Blattman & Jay G. Ha

769 F.Supp.2d 1240 (2011) Stephen C. HOLCK, Individually and as Trustee of the Trust Agreement of Stephen C. Holck Dated July 9, 2007 Under Agreement Dated September 10, 2007, Plaintiff, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION; BNY Mellon Wealth Management Trust; Mellon Trust Company of California now known as BNY Mellon, N.A.; Ben McGloin; Heidi Benavidez; John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10; Doe Corporations 1-10; and Doe Entities 1-10, Defendant

607 F.Supp. 1491 (1984) In re NEW MEXICO NATURAL GAS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Sheila BREWER, Mark Fleisher, Ramon Huerta, Marie Loague, Jay Miller, Vodene Patterson, and Eliu E. Romero, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHERN UNION COMPANY and Southern Union Gathering Company, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-F-1173 (MDL-403). United States District Court, D. Colorado.

THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 16 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2024 February 3, 2025 SAMUEL MARTIN NANIA, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-24-0064 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal from the District Court

THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 16 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2024 February 3, 2025 SAMUEL MARTIN NANIA, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-24-0064 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal from the District Court

273 P.3d 624 (2012) CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Arizona, Defendant/Appellee, and Southern Arizona Leadership Council and Senator Jonathan Paton, Defendant-Intervenors/Appellees. No. CV-11-0150-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. April 6, 2012. Thomas C. Horne, Arizona Attorney General by James E. Barton II, David