Cases

MEMORANDUM KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. Plaintiff Donald R. Lovell sued Defendants Champion Car Wash, LLC and Tim Jones, claiming that he was terminated from employment in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Tennessee Disability Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-50-103, and the Tennessee Human Rights Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-21-101 et seq.

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on several motions to dismiss: (1) Defendants Greenhorne & O’Mara, Inc. (“Greenhorne”), Thomas Copeland (“Copeland”), Evelyn Jones, and Daniel Jones’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Local Rule 7 (Docket No. 7); (2) Defendant City of Chesapeake, Virg

ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiff, Maria G. Peña’s (“Peña[’s]”) Renewed Motion for Certification of Collective Action and for Permission to Send Court Supervised Notice to. Employees of Their Opt-in Rights ... (“Motion”) [ECF No. 26], filed April 7, 2014. The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion; Defendants’ Response in Opposition ... (“

REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiffs filed this civil action, using the pseudonyms Jane Does 1 to 5, against George Washington University ("GW") and Kyle Renner, a GW employee being sued in his capacity as GW's General Operations Manager and the plaintiffs' supervisor (collectively, "the defendants"), pursuant to the District of Columbia's Human Rights Act ("D.C. Human Rights Act"),

DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH, United States District Judge This dispute arises from an interaction between the plaintiffs and a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) police officer, William O'Brien (O'Brien). Before the Court is WMATA's Motion to Dismiss and Officer O'Brien's Partial Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. Dkt. 14. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant WMATA's motion, and the Court will grant in

John Fitzgerald, et al. v. Tatyana S. Bell, Personal Representative of the Estate of John Thurman Bell No. 3499, Sept. Term, 2018 Opinion by Leahy, J. Statute of Limitations > Accrual of Claims > Discovery Rule > Continuation of Events Theory As a corollary to the discovery rule, our courts recognize the “continuation of events” theory, pursuant to which the statute of limitations may be tolled when a confidential or fiduciary relationship exists between the parties. Frederick Rd. Ltd. P’ship

USCA11 Case: 20-12152 Date Filed: 03/25/2022 Page: 1 of 42 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-12152 ____________________ RODNEY KEISTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus STUART BELL, in his of

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 23-CV-0413 MA SHUN BELL, APPELLANT, V. WEINSTOCK, FRIEDMAN & FRI

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2015 UT 14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH COREY AND CAROL NIELSEN, for and in behalf of C.N., a minor, Appellees, v. WADE AND LAURA BELL, on behalf of B.B., a minor Appellants.

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2015 UT 79 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH COREY AND CAROL NIELSEN, for and in behalf of C.N., a minor, Appellees, v. WADE AND LAURA BELL, on behalf of B.B., a minor Appellants.

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 23-CV-0413 MA SHUN BELL, APPELLANT, V. WEINSTOCK, FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN,

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Click Properties, LLC and Hyper Formance, LLC, Respondents, v. Thomas SC Properties, LLC and All-Tech Tire and Auto Repair, LLC, Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2022-001499 Appeal From Pickens County Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge Alex Ki

816 F.Supp.2d 831 (2011) Francie MOELLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TACO BELL CORP., Defendant. No. C 02-5849 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 5, 2011. *835 Timothy P. Fox, Amy F. Robertson, Ari Reuben Krichiver, Fox & Robertson, P.C., Denver, CO, Antonio Michael Lawson, Lawson Law Offices, Oakland, CA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA North Strabane Township : CASES CONSOLIDATED : v. : No. 958 C.D. 2023 : Majestic Hills LLC, and : JND Properties, LLC : : Appeal of: Lakemont Gardens, LLC : North Strabane Township : : v. : No. 959 C.D. 2023

127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007) BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. William TWOMBLY et al. No. 05-1126. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 27, 2006. Decided May 21, 2007. *1960 Stephen M. Shapiro, Kenneth S. Geller, Richard J. Favretto, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, Washington, D.C., Laura J.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0170p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN │ DEGRAND; DANIEL DRAIN; WAVERS SMITH; RICHARD

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0204p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN DEGRAND; │ DANIEL

Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant PTT, LLC's ("High 5") Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. # 34. The underlying dispute is a class action to recover money lost playing electronic gambling games available through mobile apps. High 5 argues that the Complaint should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a clai

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit