Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bell v. Collateral Mortgage, Ltd.”
LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Prosperpublic domain
GÓMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (December 17, 2008) Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff, LPP Mortgage Ltd, f/k/a Loan Participant Partners, Ltd (“LPP”), to dismiss the counterclaim filed by the defendants, Gibson Prosper and Theona R. Prosper (together, the “Prospers”). For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny the motion in
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Orcuttpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART AND REVERSING IN PART BANKRUPTCY COURT’S APRIL 2, 2013 ADVERSARY PROCEEDING ORDER AND BANKRUPTCY COURT’S APRIL 2, 2013 PLAN AND HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION ORDER (No. 13-82, Doc. 1; No. 13-83, Doc. 1) CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court on the appeals filed by GMAC Mortgage, LLC (“GMAC”) from two Orders of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Dis
Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Burnham Mortgage, Inc.public domain
720 F.Supp.2d 978 (2010) FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BURNHAM MORTGAGE, INC., Exeter Title Company, Ticor Title Insurance Company, James C. Peddle, Derrick Davis, Eric C. Vehovc, Market Value Appraisal, Inc., Maya N. Jordan, Larry D. Burkes, Kevin R. Brisker, John Jeffrey Hlava, Adam Bat, Adam Butar, Zbigniew Rymarz, Waldemar Florkiewicz, Dorothy Spann, Charlene Adams, Kuba Jasny, a/k/a Grosz Piotr, Barbara Odrzywolska, Marek Maka,
Welk v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCpublic domain
ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. In recent years, the federal courts have been inundated with lawsuits brought by homeowners challenging the foreclosures of the mortgages on their homes. Some of these lawsuits are meritorious, but many are not, and quite a few are frivolous. The most common type of frivolous lawsuit is premised on what judges often refer to as the “show-me-the-note” theory.
Manson v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION STEARNS, District Judge. This putative class-action was brought by Massachusetts residents whose *33homes were foreclosed, or against whom an invalid foreclosure process was initiated, between November 20, 2004, and December 31, 2008. Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief in the form of n
Ltd. Invest. Group Corp. v. Huntington Natl. Bankpublic domain
[Cite as Ltd. Invest. Group Corp. v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 2022-Ohio-3657.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Limited Investment Group Corp., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 21AP-61 v. : (C.P.C.
Schilke v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSBpublic domain
758 F.Supp.2d 549 (2010) Martha SCHILKE, both individually and as a representative of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB, and American Security Insurance, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 09-cv-1363. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 14, 2010.
First Mortgage Corporation v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 19-1798 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 06/12/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-1798 ______________________ Appeal from the United States
Conquest v. WMC Mortgage Corp.public domain
OPINION Slomsky, District Judge Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 626 II. BACKGROUND...626 A. Conveyance of the Property and the Terms of the First Mortgage... 626 B. The Fire Insurance Policy.. .628 C. The Second Mortgage Assignment ...629 D. Fire Loss and Insurance Proceeds ...629</
Associated Mortgage Bankers, Inc. v. Castropublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASSOCIATED MORTGAGE BANKERS, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-0075 (ESH) v. BEN CARSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants have filed a partial motion to dismiss plaintif
Robinson v. Standard Mortgage Corp.public domain
■SECTION: R ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants Standard Mortgage Corporation and Standard Mortgage Insurance Agency, Inc. move the Court to dismiss plaintiff’s - claims under the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and 1962(d), for failure to staté a claim.1 Because plaintiff fails to p
US Mortgage, Inc. v. Saxtonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. MORTGAGE, INC., a Nevada corporation; JOHN KEILLY, an individual; JOHN W. BROUWERS, MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION, BROUWERS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FIRST SAVINGS BANK; COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION; CONNELLY FAMILY TRUST, Terry Connelly and Mary Connelly, Trustees; ALISA CROMER; DOVE, LLC; GERALD AND LUCETTE DOWLINGS TRUST DTD 07/06/99, Gerald and Lucette Dowling, Trustees; DR
In re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Opposed Motion by May/June 2007 Underwriter Defendants to Dismiss Consolidated Class Action Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, filed September 22, 2008 (Doc. 128)(“May/June Underwriters’ Motion”); (ii) the Opposed Motion to Dismiss of Underwriter Defend
WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.public domain
856 F.Supp. 1076 (1994) WAMCO, III, LTD., Plaintiff, v. FIRST PIEDMONT MORTGAGE CORP., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 2:93cv1003. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. June 27, 1994. *1077 *1078 Robert Temple Mayo, Williams, Mullen, Christian & Dobbins, Richmond,
In Re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
695 F.Supp.2d 1165 (2010) In re THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. CIV 07-0815 JB/WDS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. January 27, 2010. *1170 Frederick S. Fox, Aviah Cohen Pierson, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, Nancy Kaboolian, Abbey Spanier Rodd Abrams & Paradis, LLP, Curtis V. Trinko, Law Offices of Cu
Xcaliber International, Ltd. v. Georgia ex rel. Carrpublic domain
ORDER HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case is the State of Georgia’s motion to dismiss Xcaliber International, Ltd. LLC’s complaint. Doc. 14.1 Xcaliber, a tobacco product manufacturer, asserts that pieces of Georgia’s tobacco regulatory regime violate the Constitution’s Contracts and Equal Protection Clauses, as well
U.S. Mortgage, Inc. v. Saxtonpublic domain
494 F.3d 833 (2007) U.S. MORTGAGE, INC., a Nevada corporation; John Keilly, an individual; John W. Brouwers, Memorandum Disposition, Brouwers Family Limited Partnership, First Savings Bank; Community College of Southern Nevada Foundation; Connelly Family Trust, Terry Connelly and Mary Connelly, Trustees; Alisa Cromer; Dove, LLC; Gerald and Lucette Dowlings Trust DTD 07/06/99, Gerald and Lucette Dowling, Trustees; Dr. Investments, Ltd.; Lorraine A. Engle,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HURLEY, Senior District Judge: Plaintiff Global Funding Group, LLC (“plaintiff’) commenced this action against 133 Community Road, Ltd., American Real Estate Investments, LLC, Arete Real Estate & Development Co., Casa Capital Group, Casa Capital Group Developments, Dan Dodson, Lachlan McPherson, and James Wine (collectively, “defendants”) in Nassau County Supreme Court asserting c
Owens-Benniefield v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCpublic domain
ORDER VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ' COVINGTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC’s Amended Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 23), filed on May 15, 2017. Pro se Plaintiff Vickie Owens-Benniefield filed a response on May 23, 2017. (Doc. # 25). For the reasons that follow, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. I.
Hoover v. HSBC Mortgage Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION On February 8, 2013, Plaintiffs commenced this putative class action alleging that Defendants engaged in a scheme to generate fees and income for themselves by requiring mortgagors to purchase flood insurance for amounts and time periods *230not req