Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
14 opinions for “Beleno v. United States”
Gomez-Beleno v. Holderpublic domain
644 F.3d 139 (2011) Gilberto William GOMEZ-BELENO, Sandra Avila-Gaviria, a/k/a Sandra Avila-Gavaria, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent.[*] Docket No. 07-0874-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Motion Submitted: May 3, 2011. Decided: July 7, 2011.
Gomez-Beleno v. Mukaseypublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioners, natives and citizens of Colombia, seek review of a February 6, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the September 4, 2002 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Joseph A. Russelburg, which denied their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Gomez-Beleno, Nos. A95 462 655/656 (B.I.A. Feb. 6, 2007), affg Nos.
Beleno v. Lakeypublic domain
FRED BIERY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Complaint (docket no. 11) pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiffs' response (docket no. 14), defendants' reply (docket no. 22), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment Based on Mootness (docket no. 25), plaintiffs' response (docket no. 27) and defendants' r
Ward v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
PROST, Circuit Judge, with whom RADER, Chief Judge joins, concurring. I agree with the majority that Thomas O. Ward must be awarded attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, because he qualifies as a “prevailing party” under Former Employees of Motorola Ceramic Products v. United States, 336 F.3d 1360 (Fed.Cir.2003) (Rader,
N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Educationpublic domain
23-764 (XAP) N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2024 (Argued: April 24, 2025 Decided: July 24, 2025) No. 23-764-cv (XAP) _____________________________________ N.G.B., individually and
Caplash v. Nielsenpublic domain
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jolly Manoj Caplash ("Plaintiff") commenced this litigation on December 29, 2015, and requested that this Court set aside the denial and subsequent refusals to reopen Plaintiff's Form I-130 family-based immigration petition (the "Petition") filed on behalf of his brother with the United States Citizenship and Immigratio
Higgins v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICESpublic domain
801 F.Supp.2d 541 (2011) Jeffrey HIGGINS, On Behalf of His Infant Daughter and of the Class Similarly Situated and Andromida A. McCall, On Behalf of Her Infant Daughter and of the Class Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES and David L. Lakey, M.D., In His Official Capacity as Commissioner, Defendants. Civil Action No. SA-10-CV-990-XR. United States District Court, W.D.
Castaneda Castillo v. Holder, Jr.public domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This is the sixth (and hopefully the final) installment of Petitioner David Eduardo Castañeda’s tumultuous voyage through our nation’s immigration system. Castañeda began his journey more than twenty years ago, when he arrived in the United States seeking political asylum based on the alleged persecution he suffered at the hands of the Shining Path, a rut
ORDER XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge. On this date, the Court considered Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 4) and the Response and Reply thereto. After careful consideration, the Court will grant the motion in part and dismiss it as moot in part. I. Background Plaintiffs bring suit against the Texas Department of Health Services (“the Department”) and Davi
Ward v. U.S. Postal Servicepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ THOMAS O. WARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. __________________________ 2010-3021 __________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. PH0752090126-I-1. __
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0122p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ADAM KANUSZEWSKI, et al., ┐ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │ │
Rahinah Ibrahim v. US Dept. of Homeland Securitypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DR. RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an Nos. 14-16161 individual, 14-17272 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:06-cv-545- WHA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELA
Dennis Olivares v. State Farm Bankpublic domain
Jones, Andrews & Ortiz Attorneys At Law A Professional Corporation 10100 Reunion Place, Suite 600 San Antonio, Texas 7821 6 Telephone 210/344-3900 Telecopy 210/366-4301
ACCEPTED 03-15-00100-CV 6678421 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS