Cases

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania Liquor Control : Board, : : Petitioner : : v. : No. 91 C.D. 2018 : Argued: November 15, 2018 Lazlo Beh, : : Respondent : Lazlo Beh, for

Mercure, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered December 11, 1997 in Warren County, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In this negligence action, plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries he sustained in a March 2, 1992 motor vehicle collision. Following joinder of issue and discovery, defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing th

71 So.3d 689 (2011) B.E.H., JR. v. STATE of Alabama ex rel. M.E.C. 2100151. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. April 8, 2011. *690 Cheryl Baswell-Guthrie of Baswell-Guthrie, P.C., Huntsville, for appellant. Sharon E. Ficquette, chief legal counsel, and Jennifer M. Bush, asst. atty. gen., Department of Human Resources, for

Sup. Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Court of Claims should be reinstated, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division. The trial court “by necessary implication from its award of consequential damages” found the loss of direct access rendered the property unsui

657 F.Supp. 173 (1987) Donna BEH, Plaintiff, v. Donald R. OSTERGARD, M.D., and the Regents of the University of California, Defendants. No. CIV 86-0012 JC. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 17, 1987. *174 Toulouse, Toulouse & Garcia P.A., Narcisco Garcia, Jr., Albuquerque, N.M., for plaintiff. Jerrald

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Court of Claims should be reinstated, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division. The trial court “by necessary implication from its award of consequential damages” found the loss of direct access rendered the property unsui

126 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 482 (1989) 560 A.2d 276 Glover M. BEH, Appellant, v. The CITY OF SCRANTON and the Council of the City of Scranton and Moses Taylor Hospital, Appellees. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 4, 1989. Decided June 13, 1989. *483 Brion W. Kelley, Kingston, for appellant.

The appellant in this action is the executor of the estate of one Paup, deceased. There were three mortgages upon a farm in Guthrie County. The first mortgage was held by the Brotherhood of American Yeomen, and was in the amount of $23,500. The second mortgage was for $12,000, held by the appellee, and the third mortgage of $12,000 was held by Paup. All of said mortgages were in default. The appellant alleged in his petition the following: "That defendant requested plaintiff's decedent

— Judgment modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In 1953 claimant acquired approximately 80 ± acres of land located on both sides of New York State Route 104 in the Town of Webster, New York. Approximately one acre of improved land is located on the south side of the highway and the remainder lies north of the highway. Before the appropriation claimant had access to the northerly parcel from Route

PER CURIAM. The buyer and seller of a parcel of real estate in West Des Moines, acting on the alleged promises of city authorities that access to a particular street would be granted, entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of the property. When the city refused access to this street, this litigation ensued. The buyer sued the seller for rescission of the contract and for damages. The seller, in turn, sued the city a

PER CURIAM. We address whether a credit reporting agency is liable under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Pub.L. No. 90-321, 84 Stat. 1128 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1681), when it relies on inaccurate information contained in public records. We also consider the appropriate scope of a *445reinvestigation of a disputed report under 15 U.S.C. § 1681L

131 N.W.2d 488 (1964) Carleton D. BEH, Appellant, v. CITY OF WEST DES MOINES, Iowa, Appellee. No. 51498. Supreme Court of Iowa. November 17, 1964. Rehearing Denied January 11, 1965. *489 Herrick, Langdon, Sandblom & Belin, Des Moines, for appellant. Jack R. Hall, Des Moines, for appellee. SNELL,

These appeals arise out of the claims of seamen against their former employers (the owners and operators of ships on which they served) and various manufacturers, alleging injuries from exposure to asbestos products while aboard these ships. The facts and procedural background of this litigation are thoroughly set out in Sheffield v. Owens-Corning FiberglassCorp., 595 So.2d 443 (Ala. 1992), which involved the claims of William Shaw,

The petitioner is the widow of Roy Gordon Beh and filed her petition for compensation on behalf of herself as the widow and on behalf of their two minor children. The accident having occurred out of the state, the judgment of the Bureau cannot be reviewed in the Court of Common Pleas, socertiorari was allowed directly to this court. Roy Gordon Beh, on December 20th, 1945, was employed as a traveling representative for the defendant corporation. He was originally employe

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 281 This is a workmen's compensation case in which the sole issue is whether prosecutor's decedent died as the result of an accident arising "out of" his employment within the intendment of the Workmen's Compensation Act. Petitioner's claim was dismissed in the Workmen's Compensation Bureau. The accident having

Plaintiff, while riding a horse on a public highway, came into collision with a Ford automobile owned by defendant, Joseph C. Beh, and driven by his son, Joseph C. Beh, Jr. Plaintiff was seriously injured. He brought this suit for damages claiming the automobile was driven in an unlawful and negligent manner which caused the accident. On trial in the circuit court without a jury defendants had judgment. Plaintiff has appealed. Numerous assignments of error are made, but in the main pla

GODDARD, District Judge. This is a suit for infringement of mechanical Patent No. 2,203,311 issued June 4, 1940, claims 2 and 4, and Design patents D-l 18,420, issued January 2, 1940, and D-122,931 issued October 8, 1940. The plaintiffs demand the usual relief of injunction and damages. The defense is non-infringement and the invalidity of the patents at issue. The plaintiff, Sinclair, is the patentee

On September 30, 1930, the plaintiff and defendants entered into a written lease of plaintiff's farm for a *Page 730 period of one year from March 1, 1931, which provided that at the termination of the lease it could be extended for an additional three-year period if satisfactory to both parties. The lease contained the following clause: "It is understood that the said Carleton Beh (the landlord) shall have, in addition to the lien given him by law

Stevens, J. — It is conceded that signatures to both notes were written by F. N. Van Ness, who was the husband of defendant, and who was deceased at the time of the commencement *152"of this action. The defendant denied the execution of the notes, and averred that, if the same were signed by her husband, no consideration was received therefor. At the conclusion of all the