Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Beers v. Harrison”
Harrison v. Gregorypublic domain
LAMBERT, J. In this wrongful death case, Marie Lynn Harrison and Deborah Harrison (“Appellants”) appeal a final judgment entered against them and in favor of William Gregory, as personal representative of the estate of Joshua Raim Kalphat Lopez (“Appellee”). Lopez (“Decedent”) died as a result of injuries that he sustained when his motorcycle collided with a motor vehicle driv
People v. Harrisonpublic domain
Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
David Harrison v. Scott Kernanpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID SCOTT HARRISON, No. 17-16823 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:16-cv-07103- NJV SCOTT KERNAN; JEFFREY A. BEARD, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Ap
Harrison, Johnathen Leepublic domain
£S5-(S IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS ORIGINAL FROM THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS Cause No. 11-11-00241-CR AND THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT BROUN COUNTY, TEXAS SEP 15 2015 Trial No. CR20133 AbelAcosta, CJerk PETITION FOR DISCRE
State v. C. Harrisonpublic domain
JUSTICE WHEAT, dissenting. ¶20 I dissent from the Court’s decision reversing the District Court’s denial of Harrison’s motion to dismiss the tampering with evidence charge brought against her after she fled the hospital to avoid having *58her blood drawn pursuant to a lawful warrant. I conclude the factual di
State v. Harrisonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Harrison, 2013-Ohio-1235.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee v. TODD D. HARRISION Defendant-Appellant Appellate Case No. 25128 Trial Court Case No. 12-TRD-226 (Criminal Appeal from (Municipal Court) ...........
State v. Harrisonpublic domain
69 So.3d 581 (2011) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Chelsea M. HARRISON, Appellant. No. 46,325-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. May 18, 2011. *584 Louisiana Appellate Project, by Douglas Lee Harville, for Appellant. Charles R. Scott, District Attorney, Jacob Broussard, Brian H. Barber, Assistant District A
Rodney Lee Harrison v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-21-00031-CR RODNEY LEE HARRISON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 2027750 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens
Al-Khatib v. Harrison Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appealspublic domain
[Cite as Al-Khatib v. Harrison Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 2022-Ohio-1418.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY AMAR AL-KHATIB : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 29299
Smallwood v. Harrisonpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1022 Josh Harrison and Josh Harrison d/b/a Western Motor Group ("the defendants") petition this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss the action filed by the plaintiff, M. Smallwood, on the ground that the trial court lacks in personam jurisdiction over
People v. Harrisonpublic domain
Docket No. 102859. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. DWIGHT HARRISON, Appellant. Opinion filed October 18, 2007. JUSTICE KILBRIDE delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Fitzgerald, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the ju
United States v. Harrisonpublic domain
*1158Opinion by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BYBEE. ORDER The opinion is amended to replace the first two sentences of the first full paragraph on page 11321 of the slip opinion with the following: < Although the evidence under count 2 would have been sufficient to support the jury’s verdict,
People v. Harrisonpublic domain
JUSTICE KILBRIDE delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Fitzgerald, Gar-man, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion. Justice Burke specially concurred, with opinion, joined by Justice Freeman. OPINION Dwight Harrison was char
Harrison v. Republic of Sudanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. This case arises out of the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole (“the Cole”) on October 12, 2000. The attack ripped a thirty-two-by-thirty-six-foot hole in the side of the vessel when it was berthed in Yemen’s Aden Harbor. Seventeen servicemen and women were killed, and forty-two suffered injuries. The eighteen plai
Beshers v. Harrisonpublic domain
PRESNELL, District Judge, concurring: In light of Harris, I am compelled to concur in the panel decision. However, I think the panel opinion fails to portray the facts in the proper light. We start with the premise that officer Harrison applied deadly force to seize Beshers. The question is, was that use of force objectively reasonable under the facts and circumstances of this case? When the facts
Harrison v. the Kroger Co.public domain
737 F.Supp.2d 554 (2010) Lisa M. HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. THE KROGER CO., Defendant. Civil Action No. 7:09cv453. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. July 22, 2010. *555 James P. Cargill, Law Office of James P. Cargill, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Plaintiff. C. Kailani Memmer, Guynn Memmer & Dillon,
People v. Harrisonpublic domain
25 Cal.Rptr.3d 224 (2005) 35 Cal.4th 208 106 P.3d 895 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Cedric HARRISON, Defendant and Appellant. No. S035367. Supreme Court of California. March 3, 2005. Rehearing Denied May 18, 2005. Certiorari Denied October 3, 2005.
Harrison v. Abry Bros.public domain
LEMMON, Judge. This is an appeal by plaintiff’s employer from a judgment awarding workmen’s compensation benefits for permanent partial disability, as well as penalties and attorney’s fees. On appeal defendant questions (1) the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the finding of disability caused by the accident and (2) the finding that it was unreasonable in terminating benefit payments. Plaintiff had
Harrison v. Exxon Corp.public domain
SCHOTT, Judge. Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment dismissing his claim for damages for injuries he sustained while he was servicing defendant’s automobile. Defendant Naquin, accompanied by his wife, was driving home at about 11:30 PM one Saturday when the warning light on his dashboard lit up signalling that his engine had overheated. He immediately proceeded to an EXXON Service Station two blocks
United States v. Rex Harrisonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10391 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:07-CR-00384- REX T. HARRISON, DAE-1 Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND AMENDED OPINIO