Cases

Barnes, J. This case is before us on a direct appeal from an order of the Nebraska state railway commission requiring the Union Pacific Railroad Company to construct a depot and install an agent therein at the village of Gandy. The appellant has filed a motion asking the court to remand the cause to the commission for the purpose of taking further testimony and making a different order. The application is

ORDER ALLEY, District Judge. The plaintiff Advance-United Expressways, Inc. (Advance-United) commenced this action in September 1989 seeking $5,525 in alleged undercharges, based on transportation services that it rendered to the defendant Beeler Distributing Company (Beeler) allegedly in its capacity as a motor common carrier. Presently, Advance-United moves the Court for summary judgement under the so-c

154 F.Supp. 917 (1957) Fred H. SHIELS, Robert L. Swafford, Keith U. Clark, and R. D. Vernon v. The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. No. IP 56-C-231. United States District Court S. D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. August 30, 1957. *918 George Rose, Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiffs. Martz, Beatty & Wallace, Indi

MURRAH, Circuit Judge. The appellant J. P. Beeler, brought these two actions against the appellee Railroad Company, based upon a collective bargaining agreement between the Railroad Company and the Yardmasters Union, of which he Í9 a member. The agreement, dated May 20, 1944, pertinently provided that yardmasters should not be disciplined or dismissed without a hearing before the superintendent, and that such employees should

68 Cal.App.2d 48 (1945) SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. CHARLES J. McCOLGAN, as Franchise Tax Commissioner, etc., Respondent. Civ. No. 12631. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. Feb. 16, 1945. C. W. Durbrow and Harry H. McElroy for Appellant. Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, Hartwell H. Linney, Chief Assistant At

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Defendant and Respondent. S277211 Second Appellate District, Division Five B310118 Los Angeles County Superior Court BC574690 August 22,

263 S.W.3d 827 (2008) COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY v. John G. MORGAN et al. No. M2006-00591-SC-R11-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. June 4, 2008 Session. September 9, 2008. *832 Ron L. Quigley, Davis, Matthews & Quigley, P.C., and Stephen H. Price, Stites & Harbison, PLLC, for the appellee, Colo

245 Kan. 316 (1989) 777 P.2d 851 CITY OF LENEXA, KANSAS, Appellee, v. C.L. FAIRLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant. No. 62,002 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 17, 1989. Stephen J. Dennis, of Niewald, Waldeck, Norris & Brown, of Overland Park, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant. R. Scott

Opinion GEORGE, C. J. We assumed jurisdiction in these original writ proceedings to address an important but relatively narrow legal issue—whether a local executive official who is charged with the ministerial duty of enforcing a state *1067statute exceeds his or her authority when, without any court h

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING FIXTURE CLASSIFICATION AND VALUATION MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction... 339 A. Fixtures .. .340 B. Valuation.. .341 II. Background.. .342

595 F.Supp. 520 (1984) Cindy S. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF OVERLAND PARK, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-2219. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 11, 1984. *521 *522 Arthur E. Palmer, Harold S. Youngentob, Les E. Diehl of the firm of Goodell, Stratton, Edmonds, Palmer

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 315 This is an action sounding in tort to recover damages from appellant, a common carrier, for injuries sustained by horses included in a carload shipment. The dereliction charged is that the carrier so negligently operated its freight train that one horse was killed and seven others were injured while being transpor

The petition of the Memphis Natural Gas Company, a Delaware corporation, filed herein against the State Tax Commission seeks a judicial review of certain tax assessments levied by such Commission under the state income tax act (Chapter 120, Laws of 1934 and amendments thereto), on the net income of the petitioner for the years 1937-1941, inclusive, attributable to the ownership and use of the property of such Gas Company within this state devoted exclusively to the business of interstate comm

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge: Throughout the long summer of 1787, the Framers of the Constitution, assembled at Philadelphia, hammered the parochial prejudices of thirteen colonies into the rough framework of a union. There, a fundamental tenet of American jurisprudence was forged: federal courts are courts of limited jurisdicti

226 Md. 499 (1961) 174 A.2d 175 HENTHORN v. THE WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY COMPANY [No. 39, September Term, 1961.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided October 17, 1961. The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ. Morgan L. Amaimo, for appellant. Paul S. Parsons, for appellee.

CHRISTIE, District Judge. This is an action by petitioners under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 •et seq., seeking enforcement of Award No. 9193 of the Third Division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board, made the 18th day of January, 1960. The award stated that the transfer by the railway company of work from one seniority district to another without consulting the union violated the collective bargaining agreem

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. Earl C. Stoltz instituted this action against appellant, Burlington Transportation Company, to recover damages for the wrongful death of his minor son, while a passenger on appellant’s bus. There is no conflict in the evidence. In fact, appellant defendant below introduced no evidence relating to the occurrence of the accident resulting in the death of app

Mr. Justice Reed, concurring. My analysis of this case leads me to concur on grounds stated later without the extensive comment and broad treatment given by the opinion of Mr. Justice Frankfurter. What is there said as to the substantive law to be applied in § 301 actions will be pertinent in cases which are deemed to have been properly brought under that section — that is, where there i

366 F.Supp. 913 (1973) OLD HICKORY PRODUCTS CO., LTD. v. HICKORY SPECIALTIES, INC. and Don E. Crace, Individually and as President of Hickory Specialties, Inc., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant. Civ. A. No. 17045. United States District Court, N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. November 21, 1973.

Mr. Justice Belaval delivered the opinion of the Court. The Inter Island Shipping Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of Puerto Rico, with its main office in Puerto Rico, executed a contract of work in Puerto Rico with Roque Rosado Claudio, residing in Puerto Rico, by-virtue of which Rosado Claudio would work as seaman on board the ship “TMT Lloyd” in trips from the port of San Juan, Puerto R