Cases

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRAA. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Thomas R. Becnel and Jardine Ventures, LLC (collectively, “Becnel”) sued Deutsche Bank AG and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. (collectively, “Deutsche Bank”) for state-law claims of fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abe

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, Thomas R. Becnel and Jar-dine Ventures, LLC (collectively “Becnel”) and David Soward, bring these diversity actions against Deutsche Bank AG and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. (collectively “Deutsche Bank”) alleging state-law claims of fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, fraudulent concealment, aid

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER DAWSON, District Judge. This matter was filed on behalf of plaintiff Thomas Becnel, individually and as trustee of the Becnel Family Trust and CST Trust, BCTS LLC and Jardine Ventures and as a representative of all those similarly situated, as a result of transactions between the several defendants and the putative plaintiff class involving certain tax strategies

410 F.Supp.2d 519 (2006) Garrett SNOOK, Sharon M. Snook, GS Owl Creek Investments LLC, Gstd Partners, Gstd Investors, Inc., Andrew P. Barton, Ann Barton, Apb Sanders Investments LLC, Reeds Investments Partners, Reeds Sanderson Investors, Inc., John Bertsch, Eileen Bertsch, Jrb Reeds Investments LLC, Sanderson Investments Partners, Sanderson Reeds Investors, Inc., David Pease, III, Elizabeth D. Pease, DP Rookwood Investments LLC, Jmp Madison Investments L

387 F.Supp.2d 984 (2005) Thomas R. BECNEL, individually and as trustee of the Becnel Family Trust, et al. Plaintiffs v. KPMG LLP, et al. Defendants No. 05-6015. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division. June 21, 2005. Richard A. Adams, Texarkana, TX, W.H. Dub Arnold, New York City, Max W. Berger, New York City, Jai Chandrasekhar, New York Ci

Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION Sandy Tegeler ("Ms. Tegeler") and Curtis Tegeler ("Mr. Tegeler") filed a Chapter 7 petition on November 7, 2016, thereby becoming the debtors in the main case (hereinafter, they are sometimes referred to as "the Debtors"). On February 9, 2017, Trustmark National Bank ("Trustmark") initiated the pending ad

David C. Godbey, United States District Judge This Memorandum Opinion and Order addresses Defendant Pershing, LLC's *748("Pershing") motion for summary judgment [129]. Because Plaintiffs' claims are time-barred, the Court grants the motion. I. THE ORIGINS OF THE DISPUTE This action arises out o

b. Breach of contract Under Virginia law, "[t]he elements of a breach of contract action are (1) a legally enforceable obligation of a defendant to a plaintiff; (2) the defendant's violation or breach of that obligation; and (3) injury or damage to the plaintiff caused by the breach of obligation."9 Ramos v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA ,

Case: 18-11052 Document: 00515244170 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 19, 2019

Chin, Circuit Judge: Third-party garnishees appeal from a judgment of the district court (Seybert, /.) directing them to turn over $1,056,444.15 to a judgment creditor to satisfy a judgment against a judgment debtor. The district court awarded the sum as damages for the garnishees’ violation of certain restraining notices. The garnishees also appeal from the district court’s post-judgment order denyin

16-3995-cv CSX Transp., Inc. v. Island Rail Terminal, Inc. et al UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2016 (Argued: September 25, 2017 Decided: January 10, 2018) Docket No. 16‐3995‐cv CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.,

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In October 2010, plaintiff Charles M. Croons (“Croons” or “plaintiff’) filed this discrimination lawsuit against the New York State Office of Mental Health’s Central New York Psychiatric Center (“CNYPC”) and several of its current and former employees. Plaintiffs operative complaint enumerated

420 F.Supp.2d 885 (2006) SAMUEL TRADING, LLC, Jacqueline Trading, LLC, Gabriel Trading, LLC, Lawrence Trading, LLC, Grossprops Associates, LLC, Scott Y. Schiller, Caroline G. Schiller, Sharon Grossinger, Lawrence R. Gould, Suzanne G. *886 Gould, Gary Grossinger, Lauren Grossinger, the Irwin Grossinger Trust, the SGG Auto Trust, the GG Auto Trust, the CGS Auto Trust, Grossinger Motorcorp, Inc, and Lunt Realty Corp., Pl

OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: On April 1, 2013, pro se Plaintiff Chuan Wang (“Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint against Samuel J. Palmisano (“Palmisa-no”), Martin Schroeter (“Schroeter”), Mark Loughridge (“Loughridge”), and J. Randall MacDonald (“MacDonald”) (collectively, “Defendants”), who are, respectively, the President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman; the Treasurer

MEMORANDUM OPINION T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge Plaintiffs in this Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”)1 case are former executives for defendant Computer Sciences Corporation and current participants in defendant Computer Sciences Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Executives (“Plan”),2 The Consolidated C

812 So.2d 45 (2002) Barry HOERNER and Peggy Rieffel Hoerner v. ANCO INSULATIONS, INC.; ACandS, Inc.; Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (Formerly Armstrong Cork Company); Asbestos Claims Management Corporation (Formerly National Gypsum Companyj); The Babcock & Wilcox Company; Branton Insulations, Inc.; et al. No. 2000-CA-2333. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. Jan

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. This action arises out of a criminal intrusion into a computer network system used to provide online gaming and Internet connectivity via an individual’s gaming console or personal computer. Plaintiffs, a nationwide putative consumer clas

754 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2010) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNITENDED ACCELERATION MAKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. This document relates to: All economic loss cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 30, 2010. *1151 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton B. Fisher, Jayne

466 F.Supp.2d 729 (2006) In re KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION. Pertains to Insurance Vanderbrook, C.A. No. 05-6323, Xavier University, C.A. No. 06-516, Chehardy, C.A. No. 06-1672, 06-1673, and 06-1674 and Kelly A. Humphreys v. Encompass Insurance Company, et al. Civil. Action Nos. 05-4182, 06-0169. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. November 2