Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Beckett v. Warden Ross Correct”
Beckett v. Powerspublic domain
494 F.Supp. 364 (1980) Donald W. BECKETT, Plaintiff, v. Sangor B. POWERS, Ramon Gray, Harvey Winans, Sgt. Hilt, Defendants. Ralph WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Wilbur J. SCHMIDT, John R. Gagnon, Gaylord Thomas, Robert Ganz, Defendants. Ralph WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Manuel CARBALLO, John R. Gagnon, James Boorman, Nathan Franke, (Officer) Dykstra, Defendants. Jerry WEATHERALL, Plaintiff, v. Manuel CARBALLO, John R. Gag
Cleveland Hts. v. Colemanpublic domain
[Cite as Cleveland Hts. v. Coleman, 2021-Ohio-846.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CITY OF CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109527 v. : JIMMY COLEMAN,
Strohl v. Gracepublic domain
OPINION GARTH, Circuit Judge: Appellant Joseph M. Strohl (“Strohl”) appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We will affirm. I. On December 26, 1986, Strohl and a confederate entered and burglarized the home of Ella Wunderly. Mrs. Wunderly, who
Strohl v. Gracepublic domain
OPINION GARTH, Circuit Judge: Appellant Joseph M. Strohl (“Strohl”) appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We will affirm. I. On December 26, 1986, Strohl and a confederate entered and burglarized the home of Ella Wunderly. Mrs. Wunderly, who
Schneider v. Kumpfpublic domain
[Cite as Schneider v. Kumpf, 2016-Ohio-5161.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY BARBARA SCHNEIDER : : Plaintiff-Appellant : Appellate Case No. 26955 : v.
Adams v. Bradshawpublic domain
484 F.Supp.2d 753 (2007) Stanley T. ADAMS, Petitioner, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:05 CV 1886. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. April 24, 2007. *754 *755 *756 *757 Jeffrey J.
David Rutlin v. Prime Succession, Inc. Kerley & Starks Funeral Homes, Inc., Jointly and Severallypublic domain
220 F.3d 737 (6th Cir. 2000) David Rutlin, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Prime Succession, Inc.; Kerley & Starks Funeral Homes, Inc., jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-1042 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Argued: March 17, 2000Decided and Filed: July 20, 2000 Appeal from the
Pinholster v. Ayerspublic domain
590 F.3d 651 (2009) Scott Lynn PINHOLSTER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert L. AYERS, Jr., Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Scott Lynn Pinholster, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeanne S. Woodford, of the California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 03-99003, 03-99008. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 23, 2009.
Pinholster v. Woodfordpublic domain
Volume 1 of 3 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SCOTT LYNN PINHOLSTER, Petitioner-Appellee, No. 03-99003 v. D.C. No. ROBERT L. AYERS, Jr., Warden, CV-95-06240-GLT Respondent-Appellant. SCOTT LYNN PINHOLSTER,
Tollett v. Hendersonpublic domain
411 U.S. 258 (1973) TOLLETT, WARDEN v. HENDERSON. No. 72-95. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 20, 1973. Decided April 17, 1973. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. R. Jackson Rose, Assistant Attorney General of Tennessee, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were David M.
United States v. Hayespublic domain
PER CURIAM: On September 10,1982, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia determined that appellee John Hayes was not in civil contempt for his failure to comply with a previous court order commanding production of certain documents requested by the Internal Revenue Service.1 The court’s ruling accepted Hayes’ assertion that he was unable to comply with the order becau