Cases

21-2905 Litovich v. Bank of America Corp., et al. United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Argued: February 9, 2023 Decided: July 2, 2024 No. 21-2905 ISABEL LITOVICH, ON BEHALF OF HERS

89 F.Supp.2d 488 (2000) Henry HALL, Plaintiff, v. SOUTH ORANGE, Franklin Township, William Young, Detective Collum and John Does 1-10, Defendants. No. 99 Civ. 3805(BDP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 20, 2000. *489 Fred Lichtmacher, Cheda & Sheehan, Jackson Heights, NY, for plaintiff. George Weinba

Opinion of the Court by Cantil-Sakauye, C. J. *1015 This case arises from the robbery and murder of an elderly couple found dead in their home. A jury convicted defendant Thomas Potts of two counts of first degree murder, one count of first degree robbery, and one count of grand theft (from a diffe

OPINION CHIN, District Judge. Plaintiff Barbara Mattera brings this proposed class action against defendants Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (“CCC”) and Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. (“CCB”) (together, “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants made and continue to make unauthorized deductions from the wages of sales *72representatives

55 Cal.Rptr.3d 865 (2007) 40 Cal.4th 907 153 P.3d 955 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John Michael BEAMES, Defendant and Appellant. No. S050455. Supreme Court of California. March 22, 2007. *869 Barry L. Morris, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Hayward, for Defendant

232 B.R. 616 (1999) In re A & R WHOLESALE DISTRIB., INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 97-32052. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. February 9, 1999. Michael L. Detzky, Law Office of Michael L. Detzky, Freehold, NJ, for Trustee, Michael L. Detzky. *617 Howard B. Leopold, Dollinger & Dollinger, P.A., Rochelle Park, NJ

OPINION OF THE COURT G.B. Smith, J. A Suffolk County jury found defendant Stephen S. LaValle guilty of first degree murder in the course of and in furtherance of first degree rape (Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [vii]) and sentenced him to death. His direct appeal comes to us from Supreme Court pursuant to our unique jurisdiction in death penalty cases (NY Const, a

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order directing that the respondent, Revlon Products Corporation, cease and desist from unfair labor practices, post notices, reinstate its employee, George Shapiro, with back pay, and give back pay and certain insurance benefits to the legal representative of Madeline Werner, another employee who died pending the proceedin

OPINION OF THE COURT Rosenblatt, J. Under New York’s capital punishment scheme, a person who commits an intentional (second degree) murder is eligible for a death sentence if any one of 13 aggravating factors is proved (see Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [i]-[xiii]), and if within 120 days after arraignment the prosecution files a notice of intention to seek

109 Cal.Rptr.2d 31 (2001) 26 Cal.4th 81 26 P.3d 357 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Steven David CATLIN, Defendant and Appellant. No. S016718. Supreme Court of California. July 16, 2001. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing September 26, 2001. *43 Horace N. F

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

98 N.J. 302 (1985) 486 A.2d 836 JEROME J. HAKE, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT HAKE, DECEASED, AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT HAKE, DECEASED; JEROME J. HAKE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND MARGARET HAKE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP, HAROLD PAYNE, ERNEST JAMES AND JOHN DOE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

664 F.Supp.2d 752 (2009) In re FORD MOTOR CO. SPEED COTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. MDL No. 1718. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 29, 2009. Order on Clarification and Reconsideration January 4, 2010. *754 Michael A. Caddell, Caddell & Chapman, Houston

704 F.Supp. 1212 (1989) CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. The LOCKFORMER COMPANY, INC., Met-Coil Systems Corp., Mechanical Data, Inc., Estimation, Inc., Lion International Company d/b/a Orange Systems, and Orange Systems/Lockmer, Defendant. No. 88 Civ. 0742 (MBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 10, 1989.

112 N.J. 384 (1988) 548 A.2d 1022 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES E. ZOLA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 16, 1988. Decided August 16, 1988. As Amended October 7, 1988. *390 Claudia Van Wyk and Paul M. Klein, Assistan

218 F.Supp. 513 (1963) John Robert ZELLNER, Mobile, Alabama, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Al LINGO, Director of Public Safety for the State of Alabama, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 1924-N. United States District Court M. D. Alabama, N. D. June 19, 1963. Fred D. Gray, Montgomery, Ala., Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Derrick A. Bell, Jr., George Smith

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff’s action, predicated on the Sherman, Clayton, and Robinson-Pat-man Acts, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, 15, and 13, sought recovery for alleged discrimination in the defendants’ licensing of motion pictures to it. At the conclusion of the presentation of the plaintiff’s evidence, Judge Sugarman granted a motion under F.R.C.