Cases

[Cite as Cain v. Cain, 2017-Ohio-708.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO JULIE M. CAIN, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2016-P-0011 - vs - : JOHN A. CAIN,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES DAVID BECK and GERALD DEAN CRUZ, Defendants and Appellants. S029843 Alameda County Superior Court 110467-A and 110467-B December 2, 2019 Justice Liu authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and Jus

Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. In State v. Odom, 116 N.J. 65, 80-81, 560 A.2d 1198 (1989), we held that an expert witness in a drug-distribution case could testify to the ultimate issue of fact — whether a defendant possessed drugs with the intent to distribute. We cautioned, howeve

445 F.Supp.2d 685 (2006) Kentrell PARKER v. Burl CAIN, Warden. Civil Action No. 05-399. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. August 9, 2006. *686 *687 *688 Kentrell Parker, Angola, LA, pro se. Battle Bell, IV, District Attorney's Office, New

(2007) Diego ZAPATA v. Burl CAIN. Civil Action No. 06-0212. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. October 30, 2007. ORDER & REASONS IVAN L.R. LEMELLE, District Judge. IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to DISMISS Petitioner's application for § 2254 habeas relief be adopted, overruling object

817 F.Supp.2d 1251 (2011) Michael CAIN and Jennifer Cain, Individuals, Plaintiffs, v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., a Florida corporation; and Willamette Valley Medical Center, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Wylie Steel Fabricators, Inc., a Tennessee corporation; and Earl Swensson Associates, Inc., a Tennessee corporation; Third-Party Defendants. No. CV. 09-723-HU.

NOS. 12-04-00013-CR 12-04-00014-CR 12-04-00015-CR 12-04-00016-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

The trial judge refused to allow parol evidence because he found the language in the settlement agreement to be unambiguous. When a party alleges mutual mistake, the task of the trial court should not be to interpret the language of the contract, but to determine whether the contract was valid. In order for a contract to be valid, there must be a meeting of the minds, which cannot exist if there is a mutual mistake. The fact that the settlement agreement is couched in unambiguous term

379 U.S. 89 (1964) BECK v. OHIO. No. 18. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 15, 1964. Decided November 23, 1964. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. James R. Willis argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Jay B. White. William T. McKnight argued the cause for respondent. With him on the

Gibson, J., dissenting. I concur with the majority that, under well established law, the search of defendant and the seizure of the packet of clearinghouse slips, all without a warrant, were lawful if the search and seizure followed a valid arrest. The right to search the person incident to arrest always has been recognized in this country and in England. Weeks v. United States (1914), 232 U. S., 383, 392; U

582 P.2d 332 (1978) Jack CAIN, Petitioner and Respondent, v. The DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES et al., Respondents and Appellants. No. 14040. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted June 14, 1978. Decided July 24, 1978. Rehearing Denied August 24, 1978. *333 Eleanor A. Parker, argue

356 P.2d 264 (1960) Kathryn L. BECK, Plaintiff in Error, v. John GIORDANO and Jennie Giordano, Defendants in Error. No. 19087. Supreme Court of Colorado, In Department. October 31, 1960. Johnson & Cain, Howard J. Miller, Lakewood, for plaintiff in error. David B. Richeson, Harry J. Kahler, Denver, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Plainti

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00099-CV In the Interest of E. N. C. FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 210,653-C, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION This appeal stems from Tammie Carr’s decision to allow Lisa and Kerry Daun to adopt her child, E.N.C., and fro

579 N.E.2d 824 (1991) 144 Ill.2d 232 162 Ill.Dec. 10 James J. BECK, Appellee, v. Christine A. STEPP et al. (Bob Brockland Pontiac-GMC, Inc., Appellant). No. 70312. Supreme Court of Illinois. September 19, 1991. *825 Hinshaw & Culbertson, Bruce L. Carmen, Chicago, for Bob Brockla

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 207 OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW This is an appeal from a conviction for the second-degree felony offense of escape under V.T.C.A., Penal Code, §38.07(d). The punishment was assessed by the jury at 20 years' imprisonment. The conviction

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 12, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ________________

WITHDRAWN 10-19-11 REISSUED 10-19-11 IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-09-00214-CV DORIS IMOGENE BAKER, CAROL BECK, DANIEL BECK, PATRICIA BROOKS, ROBERT BROOKS, EVELYN ELLIOTT, JUDY EVANS, CONNIE FICKLE, DOROTHY MILBERGER, AND LIONEL MILBERGER,

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-09-00214-CV DORIS IMOGENE BAKER, CAROL BECK, DANIEL BECK, PATRICIA BROOKS, ROBERT BROOKS, EVELYN ELLIOTT, JUDY EVANS, CONNIE FICKLE, DOROTHY MILBERGER, AND LIONEL MILBERGER, Appellants v. ENERGY TRANSFER COMPANY, D/B/A ETC TEXAS PIPELINE, LTD. AND BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS COMPANY, LP, Appel

JONES, Circuit Judge. This is a controversy over the title to ninety acres, and a little more, of land in Liberty County, Texas. The appellant, which is a Delaware corporation, brought a suit in trespass to try title against the appellees, all of whom were citizens of Texas. The appellant sought recovery of the land, and judgment fo

Beck, P. J. N. brought his equitable petition against 0., and prayed for injunction and for appointment of a receiver to take charge of certain life-insurance policies alleged to have had a stated surrender value, that the policies might’be subjected to the claims of the plaintiff under a judgment obtained by him against the defendant upon a promissory note containing a homestead:waiver clause. The judgment referred to was obtai