Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Beatriz Singer”
Otano v. Star Casualty Insurance Co.public domain
On Motion For Rehearing and/Or Clarification PER CURIAM. We grant the petitioner’s motion for rehearing. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the authority of Progressive Express Insurance Co. v. Miami Dade Health & Rehab Services, 922 So.2d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), and Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Automobile Insurance Co., 919 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). However,
Trinidad Hernández v. Estado Libre Asociadopublic domain
*842Opinión disidente emitida por la Jueza Asociada Señora Pabón Charneco. Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. (1) Ante la Opinión que antecede, no queda otra alternativ
Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Insurancepublic domain
JUSTICE BYRNE delivered the opinion of the court: This appeal arose from the petition, filed by petitioner, Rapid Settlements, Ltd., pursuant to the Structured Settlement Protection Act (Act) (215 ILCS 153/1 et seq. (West 2004)), for court approval of a transfer of a portion of Mary Foreman’s structured settlement payment rights. Respondents, Symetra Life Insur
Zev Cohen, LLC v. Fidelity National Title Insurancepublic domain
*799OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur M. Schack, J. The key questions before the court are: whether or not the existence of a Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law article 7-A administrator, to receive and administer the rent moneys for a multiple dwelling, must be disclosed in a title report as an “encumbrance” on a property; and must a title report li
In Re Foremanpublic domain
850 N.E.2d 387 (2006) In re Mary FOREMAN, Seller (Rapid Settlements, Ltd., Petitioner-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Symetra Life Insurance Company and Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company, Respondents-Appellants and Cross-Appellees). No. 2-05-0689. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. June 8, 2006. *388 William A
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO REINSTATE 22 DISMISSED PLAINTIFFS ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge. This consolidated docket is made up of approximately 800 plaintiffs, each claiming injury because of post-9/11 cleanup work in buildings neighboring the World Trade Center. Approximately 175 buildings are involved, including the Verizon building at 140 West Street (immediately to the Nor
In re Marriage of J.Q. & T.B.public domain
Opinion O’LEARY, P. J. J.Q. 2 and T.B. appeal from orders after the trial court denied J.Q.’s application for a domestic violence restraining order and request for spousal support against T.B. J.Q. filed an appeal arguing the trial court erred in denying
Rodela v. Southern California Edison Co.public domain
148 Cal.App.2d 708 (1957) BEATRIZ T. RODELA, Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Respondent. Civ. No. 21994. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two. Feb. 26, 1957. Joseph W. Fairfield, H. Gregory Brilliant and Ethelyn F. Black for Appellant. Chase, Rotchford, Downen & Drukker and Richard T. Drukker for Respondent. A
People v. Caballespublic domain
851 N.E.2d 26 (2006) 221 Ill.2d 282 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Roy I. CABALLES, Appellant. No. 91547. Supreme Court of Illinois. May 18, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 29, 2006. *28 Ralph E. Meczyk, Lawrence H. Hyman, John Thomas Moran, Jr., Chicago, for appellant.
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state
Trinidad Hernández v. Estado Libre Asociado Y Otrospublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Víctor A. Trinidad Hernández y otros Peticionarios v. Estado Libre Asociado y otros Recurridos ___________________________ María del C. Alvarado Pacheco y otros Certificación Peticionarios 2013 TSPR 73 v. 188 DPR ____ Estado Libre Asociado y otros Recurridos