Cases

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Ponce de Leon Hospitality Corp. (“H.I. Ponce”) and H.I. Mayagüez, Inc. (“HI. Mayagüez”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), brought the instant action against Avalon Logistics Inc., et ah1 pursuant to the Car-mack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act and its’ attendant regulation2, for the loss or

PER CURIAM: In this title VII 1 action the Plaintiff, Beatriz Cajigas, alleges that the defendant, Banco de Ponce, discriminated against her on account of her sex. The district court dismissed the complaint on the ground that Mrs. Cajigas had not filed administrative charg

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL V BEATRIZ VEGA Certiorari GUTIÉRREZ Procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Recurrida Sala de BAYAMÓN KLCE20240

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES Panel XI EL PUEBLO DE PUERTO RICO Certiorari Recurrido procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, v. K

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I JOEL HERNÁNDEZ Revisión SANTOS administrativa procedente del Parte Recurrente KLRA202400475 Departamento de Corrección y v. Re

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES Panel Especial CARLOS JAVIER GARCÍA Certiorari MORALES Y OTROS procedente del Recurridos Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de Ponce

247 F.Supp.2d 44 (2003) Mayling COTTO, et al., Plaintiffs v. CITIBANK, N.A., et al., Defendants No. CIV. 02-1359(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 12, 2003. Nicolas Nogueras Cartagena, Esq., San Juan, for Plaintiff. Beatriz M. Rodriguez Burgos, Esq., Fiddler, Gonzalez & Rodriguez, San Juan, for Defendant. OPINION AND OR

MARCUS, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I concur in the judgment reached by the panel majority. There was no plain error in' this case, so we must affirm Charles’s conviction. However, I write separately because I believe it unnecessary to decide a novel and difficult question of constitutional law in an area where the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence is still evolving. The majority makes a serious and s

OPINION AND ORDER DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court is co-defendants, Jack Allison, in his capacity as Executive Director of' the Highways and Transportation Authority, and the Puerto Rico Highway Authority’s Motion for Entry of Dismissal and for Imposition of Sanctions Against Plaintiff (Docket No.7).1 Co-defendants move the Court to

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IX CPD, LLC Certiorari procedente del Recurrido Tribunal de Primera Instancia, V. Sala Superior de KLCE202400050 Caguas IGLESIA DE DIOS PENTECOSTAL

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL MARK POMERANZ Certiorari Y OTROS procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Recurridos Superior de Fajardo v. TA2025CE00223

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL DELIA VIVAS BARLUCEA CERTIORARI procedente del Peticionaria Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala vs. Superior

27 F.Supp.2d 309 (1998) Carmen ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, Defendant. Civil No. 98-1322(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 2, 1998. *310 María Bobonis-Zequeira, Woods & Woods, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Beatriz M. Rodríguez, Fiddler, González & Rodríguez,

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IX YENNY ELOISA JOSEPH Certiorari procedente VIZCAIN del Tribunal de T/C/C JENNY JOSEPH Primera Instancia, Sala VIZCAINO Superior de Carolina Recurrida

El Juez Presidente Señor Hernández Denton emitió la opinión del Tribunal. En esta ocasión debemos determinar si un contrato verbal entre un proveedor de servicios legales y el Gobierno se puede validar mediante el otorgamiento de un contrato retroactivo. Resolvemos en la negativa. Por entender que el contrato es nulo, que no puede validarse retroactiva-mente y que el proveedor no puede reclamar al gobierno por

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL FIDEICOMISO PARA LOS Apelación CONDOMINIOS DE LA procedente del CIUDADELA Y OTROS Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Apelados Superior de San

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL Natalio García Arroyo Apelación procedente del Tribunal de Apelado Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de v.

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IV KELVIN SANTIAGO REVISIÓN MALDONADO procedente del Departamento Recurrido de Asuntos del Consumidor

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PARKER, District Judge. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order I revisit issues discussed in United States v. Abdon-Limas, 780 F.Supp. 773 (D.N.M.1991). Defendant has moved to suppress evidence claiming that while he was traveling on New Mexico Highway 36 he was stopped illegally in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Based on the following facts which were established at a

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. In April 1999, Beatriz Blanco-Ortega, then nine years old, cut her right pinky finger on a can of Star-Kist tuna. That is not normally the stuff of lawsuits in federal court, but her injuries were more than trivial and led to surgery, the prospect of future surgery, and minor permanent disability and scarring. Beatriz, along with her parents and sister, sued in federal court, asserting diversity jurisdi