Cases

652 F.2d 749 91 Lab.Cas. P 12,837 John C. BEASLEY, and the Brotherhood of Railway, Airline andSteamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express andStation Employees, Streamliner Lodge No.335, Appellees,v.UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. No. 81-1427. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted June 24, 198

PER CURIAM. This action comes before the court on a motion to dismiss an appeal from a denial of summary judgment for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 9 of the rules of this court. The appeal in question involves a labor dispute between plaintiffs, John C. Beasley and The Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees, Streamliner Lodge No. 335 (

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit _________________________________ No. 19-2536 _________________________________ Gary W. Miller, Plaintiff - Appellant v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defe

497 F.Supp. 213 (1980) John C. BEASLEY and the Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees, Streamliner Lodge No. 335, Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. 79-0-565. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. July 23, 1980. *214 John P. Fahey,

201 F.3d 1074 (8th Cir. 2000) WILLA JARI LOVETT, BY AND THROUGH WILLA JAUNICE LOVETT, HER NATURAL MOTHER, ACTING AS THE GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND THE ESTATE OF WILLA JARI LOVETT, BY NEXT FRIEND, WILLA JUANICE LOVETT; APPELLANT;v.UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; CHRYSLER CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; APPELLEES. No. 98-3906 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

282 F.Supp.2d 1151 (2003) Todd SIMPSON and Cheryl Coker, Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a "Amtrak," James F. Abraham, City of San Leandro, and Does 1-100, Defendants. No. C 02-4988 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 15, 2003. *1152 Scott D. Rightha

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment, one filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company ("Union Pacific"), (Dkt. 54), and another filed by Plaintiffs Cameron Beasley, Karis Beasley, William Beck, Brandy Beck, Jonathan Clayton, Stephanie Clayton, Teresa Derickson, Kathleen Fernandez, Linda Fiedler, Michael Finney, Rizalina Finney, Bruce Frankland, Margaret Frankland, Ro

OPINION MARGOLIS, Judge. Defendant brought this counterclaim to collect interest in the amount of $10 million that it allegedly erroneously paid to the plaintiff, Union Pacific Railroad Company.* The sole issue before the court is whether the increased interest rates imposed by the Act of January 3, 1975 (Act of 1975), the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (ERTA) and the Tax Equit

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Willa Jari Lovett sued DaimlerChrysler Corp. (Chrysler) and Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific) for injuries she sustained when the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee she was a passenger in collided with a Union Pacific locomotive. The jury returned a verdict in favor of both defendants. Lovett raises five issues on appeal. She contends that the district co

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47919 EDWARD A. EASTERLING and JANICE ) EASTERLING, husband and wife, ) ) Boise, June 2021 Term Plaintiffs-Respondents, ) ) Opinion filed: January 25, 2023 v. )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47919 EDWARD A. EASTERLING and JANICE ) EASTERLING, husband and wife, ) ) Boise, June 2021 Term Plaintiffs-Respondents, ) ) Opinion filed: December 21, 2021 v. )

Appellee sued appellant in two counts, claiming $15,000 as damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act,45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. Count 1 charged the defendant with negligence in failing to exercise reasonable care to furnish and maintain plaintiff a reasonably safe place to perform his work. Count 2 charged the agents, officers or employees of the defendant with negligence by reason of a defect or insufficiency in connection with its cars, mach

112 N.W.2d 752 (1962) 173 Neb. 91 Thomas W. SINGLES, Appellee, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant. Impleaded with Railway Express Agency, Inc., a corporation, Appellee. No. 34983. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 5, 1962. *753 Crossman, Barton & Norris, Omaha, for appella

MEMORANDUM OPINION NEAL B. BIGGERS, JR., Senior District Judge. This cause comes before the court on the bench trial held August 2-5, 2010. After consideration of the testimony, evidence, and exhibits presented at trial and *634the post-trial briefs submitted by the parties, the court finds as follows. Factual and

698 S.W.2d 190 (1985) P.T. & E. COMPANY and Wyman Lee Scroggins, Appellants, v. Terry Ashley BEASLEY, et. al., Appellees. No. 09-84-300 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Decided August 29, 1985. Rehearing Denied September 25, 1985. *192 William D. Perkins, Lufkin, for appellants. Bill F. Griffin

OPINION HALL, Circuit Judge: The Sherwin-Williams Company (“Sherwin-Williams”) appeals from an order of the district court granting in part, and denying in part, a motion for declaratory and injunctive relief. Sherwin-Williams brought the motion to enforce a 2001 court-approved settlement (the “2001 Settlement”), which it negotiated with appellees City o

245 F.2d 397 CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant,v.W. E. WILLIAMS, Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company, a Corporation, and Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Appellees. No. 15662. United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit. June 6, 1957. Rehearing Denied July 5, 1957.

There is no disagreement that a jury question was made as to Count A. Even though the evidence was slight, I think it was sufficient to go to the jury. I cannot agree as to Count B. The mere enumeration of plaintiff's physical troubles suffered from September, 1952, to December, 1953, does not constitute evidence that he continued to suffer from those illnesses after 1953, because his personal physician and the defendant's physician both stated that he was physically able to re

This is an appeal by the defendant railroad company from a judgment of $18,000.00 in a suit brought under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. The sole issue is whether the trial court erred in refusing to give the affirmative charge as requested by the defendant. The single count, as amended, which went to the jury charged that while the appellee was "acting within the line and scope of his employment by the defendan

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 538 This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court denying relief in equity and retransferring the cause to the law side there to be tried on the merits. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has filed also in this court an original petition for mandamus in the alternative and seeks