Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. Privileged information can be communicated in myriad ways: orally, in writing, by email, with text messages, or even through social media. This opinion addresses the circumstances under which information contained in a database may be protected from disclosure by either the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctr

Case 15-32077 Document 1 Filed in TXSB on 04/13/15 Page 1 of 72 ‘W-"'3' United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District ofTexas

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge *842INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Daniel Zeiger, Danz Doggie Daytrips ("Danz"), and Amy Freeborn allege that WellPet LLC ("WellPet") and its parent company Berwind Corporation ("Berwind," and collectively with WellPet, "defendants") manufacture, market, and sell certain dog food produc

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs allege that Defendant General Motors (GM) manufactured and sold a car engine that, due to several internal defects, consumes excessive amounts of oil, resulting in engine damage that presents a safety risk of sudden shutdowns or engine fires. GM moves to dismiss on several grounds which can broadly be grouped under challenges to personal jurisdiction for the out-of-state plaint

[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas A. Varían, CHIEF UNITED ■ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This civil action is before the Court on the following motions: (1) defendant’s Motion to Amend Judgment and Motion for Judgment as' a Matter of Law or, Alternatively, for New Trial [Doc. 159]; (2) plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (the “EEOC”) Motion for Permanent Inju

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This proposed class action, concerning alleged unpaid wages and overtime wages, was brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York *592Labor Law (“NYLL”). The Defendants have now moved for summary judgment, arguing that the Plaintiffs are not entitled to recovery under

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 14, 2011, plaintiff ButamaxTM Advanced Biofuels LLC (“Butamax”) filed suit in this district against defendant Gevo, Inc. (“Gevo”) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,851,188 (“the '188 patent”). (D.I. 1) The '188 patent discloses and claims “a recombinant microorganism having an engineered isobutanol

505 F.Supp.2d 986 (2007) The JOHN ALLAN COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. The CRAIG ALLEN COMPANY L.L.C., Craig Allen Tatro, and Erik David Leschuk, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-1150-MLB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 7, 2007. *987 *988 Charles E. Millsap, Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson &

381 B.R. 699 (2007) In the Matter of Ronald Leon HENSLEY, Debtor. Smithbuilt Financial, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Ronald Leon Hensley, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 04-31912 HCD. Adversary No. 05-3021. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. September 28, 2007. *700 William G. Lavery, Esq., Whisler & Laver

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

813 F.Supp.2d 489 (2011) PURE POWER BOOT CAMP, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. WARRIOR FITNESS BOOT CAMP, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 4810 (THK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 12, 2011. *500 Matthew Henry Sheppe, Sherri Lee Eisenpress, Reiss, Eisenpresss and Sheppe LLP, Pasquale A. Razzano, Fitzpatr

ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 5659032 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV SEE AMENDED BRF 5648230 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FILED ON 6/15/15 AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 5659167 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

PROST, Chief Judge. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) appeal from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in favor of Apple Inc. (“Apple”). A jury found that Samsung infringed Apple’s design and utility patents and d

MEMORANDUM & ORDER PAMELA K. CHEN, District Judge: Before the Court are the motions of Defendants Eivind Heiberg, Dan Rude, and David Ness1 (the “Individual Defendants”), and Nominal-Defendant Sons of Norway, (collectively, “Defendants”) to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction and 12(b)(6)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A KOREAN CORPORATION, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants ________________

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On August 8, 2018, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). Docket No. 16 ("FAC"). Defendant filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration on August 30, 2018. Docket No. 17 ("Mot."). Both parties were heard on the matter on October 25, 2018. II. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

MEMORANDUM & ORDER PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Eddy Reyes (“Plaintiff’) filed this action on October 9, 2013, alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), N.Y.C. Admin. Code. § 8-107. (Dkt. 1.) According to Plaintiff, after taking leave under the FMLA, he was not permi