⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “Baylis v. Valve Corporation”

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010-10-27 · Published · cited 7× · 7 A.3d 1166; 161 N.H. 49
7 A.3d 1166 (2010) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the NEW HAMPSHIRE JUDICIAL RETIREMENT PLAN and another v. SECRETARY OF STATE. No. 2009-621. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: April 22, 2010. Opinion Issued: October 27, 2010. *1168 Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, P.C., of Concord (Charles G. Douglas, III on the brief)
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016-01-05 · Published · cited 18× · 551 B.R. 181
ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on appeal by defendant-debtor (“defendant”) of a final order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina granting summary judgment in favor plaintiffs-appellees (“plaintiffs”) on a claim of nondischargeability, under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). See generally LeCann v. Cobham (In re Co
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009-08-13 · Published · cited 6× · 410 B.R. 338; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2191; 2009 WL 2514147
410 B.R. 338 (2009) In re Matthew J. MULLARKEY and Nicole M. Mullarkey, Debtors. Christine Greene, Plaintiff, v. Matthew J. Mullarkey and Nicole M. Mullarkey, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 07-30561-HJB. Adversary No. 08-03009. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts, Western Division. August 13, 2009. *341 Andrew Siruln
Lewis v. Bourspublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 1992-09-10 · Published · cited 39× · 835 P.2d 221; 119 Wash. 2d 667; 1992 Wash. LEXIS 216
119 Wn.2d 667 (1992) 835 P.2d 221 TAZZALYN LEWIS, ET AL, Appellants, v. PETER BOURS, Respondent. No. 58283-1. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. September 10, 1992. *668 William A. Gaylord, Doris J. Brook, and Gaylord & Eyerman, P.C.; Scott J. Horenstein and Horenstein & Dug
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009-09-18 · Published · cited 4× · 661 F. Supp. 2d 871; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86303; 2009 WL 3055281
661 F.Supp.2d 871 (2009) JOHN B., Carrie G., Joshua M., Megan A. and Erica A., by their next friend, L.A.; Dustin P., by his next friend, Linda C.; Bayli S. by her next friend, C.W.; James D. by his next friend, Susan H; Elsie H. by her next friend, Stacy Miller; Julian C. by his next friend, Shawn C; Troy D. by his next friend, T.W.; Ray M. by his next friend, P.D.; Roscoe W. by his next friend, K.B.; Jacob R. by his next friend, Kim B.; Justin S. by hi
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001-12-21 · Published · cited 599× · 274 F.3d 740
SACK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff David Giordano, a former longstanding employee of the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen G. Schwartz, Judge) granting summary judgment to the defendants and dismissing his complaint in its entirety. The complaint alleg
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987-07-22 · Published · cited 4× · 532 A.2d 80; 1987 Del. Ch. LEXIS 460
HARTNETT, Vice Chancellor. Plaintiff, a corporation, seeks to have set aside a special condition which the Sussex County Council imposed when Council granted it a conditional use permit to convert its lands into a mobile home park. Plaintiff sought to expand an existing mobile home park and the special condition requires plaintiff to erect a chain link fence separating the existing park and the new mobile home park from the
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980-05-23 · Published · cited 101× · 75 A.D.2d 55; 427 N.Y.S.2d 1009; 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10872
OPINION OF THE COURT SCHNEPP, J. On February 2, 1971 propane gas leaking from a portable cylinder tank exploded soon after the tank had been stored in a small washroom alongside a gas water heater which operated with a constant pilot light. The explosion and resultant fire occurred on the business premises of the plaintiff, Lancaster Silo, Inc. (Lancaster), and destroyed the building owned by the plaintif
Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987-05-28 · Published · cited 8× · 737 P.2d 709; 47 Wash. App. 832
47 Wn. App. 832 (1987) 737 P.2d 709 CROWN CONTROLS, INC., Respondent, v. JIM SMILEY, Appellant. No. 16804-5-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. May 28, 1987. Jim Smiley, pro se. Jeffrey C. Wishko and Lesourd & Patten, for respondent. CHAN, J.[*] Jim Smiley appeals from
Michigan Supreme Court · 1973-12-18 · Published · cited 13× · 213 N.W.2d 147; 390 Mich. 458; 1973 Mich. LEXIS 157
390 Mich. 458 (1973) 213 N.W.2d 147 KEITH v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION No. 7 June Term 1973, Docket No. 54,363. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided December 18, 1973. Rehearing denied February 22, 1974. *471 Stephen I. Schlossberg, John A. Fillion, and Jordan Rossen, for plaintiff.
District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1971-01-28 · Published · cited 2× · 323 F. Supp. 261; 168 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 708; 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14858
MEMORANDUM OPINION MAXWELL, Chief Judge. Plaintiff, Jeffrey Gabon, Inc., an Ohio corporation, complains that defendant, Joy Manufacturing Company, a *262Pennsylvania corporation, has infringed plaintiff’s patent on a coal mining machine sold to and used by Consolidation Coal Company at one of its coal mines located within the Northern Judicial Dist
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959-11-13 · Published · cited 1× · 9 A.D.2d 165; 192 N.Y.S.2d 568; 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6116
Gibson, J. An employer appeals from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board for claimant’s partial disability due to tinnitus in both ears, found by the board to be an occupational disease caused by exposure to noise from ribbing machines used in the process of assembling automobile heater cores. The machines operated by air pressure and compressed air was released from each about 42 times pe
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 119 F. Supp. 802; 101 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 31; 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4462
KLOEB, District Judge. This is a suit for infringement of Letters Patent Re-Issue No. 20,975 granted January 10, 1939, being a reissue of original Letters Patent No. 2,-098,705, applied for November 25, 1935, and granted November 9, 1937, for a functional invention relating to a metal awning, it being alleged that claims 16, 17 and 18 of the re-issue patent are being infringed, and also for infringement of United States Lett
California Court of Appeal · 1954-05-28 · Published · cited 48× · 125 Cal. App. 2d 578; 271 P.2d 122; 3 Oil & Gas Rep. 971; 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1920
125 Cal.App.2d 578 (1954) BASIN OIL CO., Respondent, v. BAASH-ROSS TOOL COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant. Civ. Nos. 19612-19613. California Court of Appeals. May 28, 1954. Eugene S. Ives for Appellant. Chandler, Wright, Tyler & Ward for Respondent. FOX, J. Defendant appeals from two judgments for damages (rendered in separate actions
Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942-11-24 · Published · cited 33× · 131 P.2d 339; 58 Wyo. 330; 1942 Wyo. LEXIS 25
This is an action, commenced April 15, 1941, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of personal property. A demurrer to the amended petition on the ground that the latter fails to state a cause of action was sustained, and plaintiff standing on his amended petition, judgment was entered against him, from which he has appealed to this court. A preliminary injunction issued herein was dissolved, and the action of the court in that connection, too, has been brought to this court. Fo
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 49 Ind. App. 565; 94 N.E. 770; 1911 Ind. App. LEXIS 234
Felt, J. Action by James R. Parsell against the Port Wayne Iron and Steel Company, for damages for personal injuries. There was a trial by jury on an amended complaint in four paragraphs, and a judgment for appellee in the sum of $2,600, from which this appeal is taken. Errors relied on question the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion to require appellee to make each paragraph of the amended