Cases

McFajrlajstd, J., 'said: I adopt this opinion, except so far as it is predicated upon the fact that no injunction was in fact issued. This I do not think materia]; but the other reasons given for refusing the judgment are sufficient. Cooper, J., delivered the opinion of the court upon all the points decided except upon the point embodied in the last syllabus, and his dis

02/18/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 29, 2025 TIMOTHY A. BAXTER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Johnson County No. CC-24-CR-120 Lisa N. Rice, Judge No. E2024-01253-CCA-R3-H

Cox, J. ¶1 This is a wrongful death action arising from an act of domestic violence in which Paul Kim stabbed to death Baerbel Roznowski, his intimate partner, in her home. Kim murdered Roznowski shortly after a City of Federal Way police officer served Kim with a temporary protection order restraining him from either contacting Roznowski or being within 500 feet of her residence. ¶2 Unchallenged jury instru

273 P.3d 462 (2012) Carola WASHBURN and Janet Loh, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Baerbel K. Roznowski, a deceased person, Respondents, v. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington corporation, Appellant. No. 66534-1-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. March 26, 2012. *464 Robert L. Christie, Thomas P. Miller, Chr

81 P.3d 1030 (2003) 206 Ariz. 571 Steven WASHBURN and Jeanette Washburn, husband and wife; Washburn Company, Inc., d/b/a Washburn Custom Builders; and Southern Arizona Homebuilders Association, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. PIMA COUNTY, a body politic, Defendant/Appellee. No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0107. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B. December

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO STEVEN WASHBURN and JEANETTE ) WASHBURN, husband and wife; ) WASHBURN COMPANY, INC., d/b/a ) 2 CA-CV 2003-0107 WASHBURN CUSTOM BUILDERS; and ) DEPARTMENT B SOUTHERN ARIZONA ) HOMEBUILDERS ASSOCIATION,

581 S.E.2d 148 (2003) In re the ESTATE OF Vera Yarborough WASHBURN, Deceased. No. COA02-1029. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 17, 2003. *149 Deaton & Biggers, by A. Susan Biggers, Shelby, for trustee appellants. Essex Richards, P.A., by G. Miller Jordan, Lisa T. Kelly, and James C. Fuller; and Leslie C. Rawls, Charlot

195 Mich. App. 42 (1992) 488 N.W.2d 787 In re WASHBURN ESTATE McCARTHY & ASSOCIATES, INC v. WASHBURN Docket No. 130196. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided July 7, 1992, at 9:30 A.M. Monaghan, LoPrete, McDonald, Sogge & Yakima (by Ronald R. Sogge), for the petitioner. *43

369 F.Supp.2d 1300 (2005) Charles HOW, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BAXTER SPRINGS, KANSAS, Donna Wixon and Robert Myers, Defendants. No. 04-2256-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 10, 2005. *1301 *1302 Kate Bohon McKinney, Thomas S. Busch, Holman Hansen & Colville PC, Overland Par

369 F.Supp.2d 1291 (2005) Ronald O. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BAXTER SPRINGS, KANSAS, Donna Wixon and Robert Myers, Defendants. No. 04-2257-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 10, 2005. *1292 *1293 Brennan P. Fagan, William J. Skepnek, Skepnek Law Firm, PA, Lawrence, KS, Sam

909 F.Supp. 554 (1995) Douglas N. WASHBURN, Plaintiff, v. SAUER-SUNDSTRAND, INC., a corporation, Suzanne Sobkowiak, Richard Coffey, and William Glassman, Defendants. No. 94 C 2708. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 1, 1995. *555 *556 Kenneth A. Kozel, Petz

947 F.Supp. 1387 (1996) Leaann D. HALL, Plaintiff, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORP.; et al., Defendants. Tammy JOHNSTON; Robert Johnston; Laura Bentley; Ralph Bentley; Susan Eisele; Darrell Dwayne Eisele; Michelle Tytlar; Jeffrey Tytlar, Plaintiffs, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Debra SHERVEY, Plaintiff, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. 92-182-JO (LEAD),

869 F.Supp. 606 (1994) BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. O.R. CONCEPTS, INC., a Texas Corporation, Defendant. No. 94 C 2877. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 6, 1994. John R. Myers, Bell, Boyd & Lloyd, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Patrick S. Coffey and Deena S. Newlander, Gardner, Ca

Wilkes, J. This bill is filed to subject to the payment of - debts certain stock belonging to defendant, W. M. Baxter. The Chancellor granted the *444relief asked, and his decree has been affirmed by the Court of Chancery Appeals, and defendants have appealed to this Court. The facts, as found by the Court of Chancery Appeals, are that defendant, W.

Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00187-CV ELIDA CABRERA, Appellant V. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, CHILI ROBINSON MD, JAMES R. CULLINGTON MD, FRANCIS BURTON MD, SIMON FREDERICKS MD, TOLBERT WILKINSON MD, 21 INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS FKA KNOLL INTERNATIONAL, MILTON ROWLEY MD, WE

April 9, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ELIDA CABRERA, Appellant NO. 14-13-00187-CV V. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, CHILI ROBINSON MD, JAMES R. CULLINGTON MD, FRANCIS BURTON MD, SIMON FREDERICKS MD, TOLBERT WILKINSON MD, 21 INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS FKA KNOLL INTERNATIONAL, MILTON ROWLEY MD, WESLEY WASHBUR

March 28, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals KATHERINE MARCUM, Appellant NO. 14-13-00197-CV V. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, DOW CORNING WRIGHT CORPORATION, CHRIS ROBINSON MD, JAMES R. CULLINGTON MD, FRANCIS BURTON MD, SIMON FREDERICKS MD, TOLBERT WILKINSON MD, 21 INTERNATIONAL HOLDINS FKA KNOLL INTERNATIONAL,

Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 28, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00197-CV KATHERINE MARCUM, Appellant V. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, DOW CORNING WRIGHT CORPORATION, CHRIS ROBINSON MD, JAMES R. CULLINGTON MD, FRANCIS BURTON MD, SIMON FREDERICKS MD, TOLBERT WILKINSON MD, 21 INTERNATIONAL HOLD

The opinion of the court was delivered by Bennett, J. It is well settled that if a judgment appears of record to have been satisfied, no scire facias will lie, at common law, to get a new execution awarded; but our statute has extended the right to maintain a writ of scire facias, to get a new execution, to cases where the apparent satisfaction, on record, has been produced by the sale of pr

The opinion of the court was delivered by Redfield, Ch. J. The question in this case is whether the *415contract of indemnity sued upon was - cancelled by the contract at the time the plaintiff gave his note for the receipt and took it up and surrendered it to the defendant. It is admitted that the contract sued upon is broad enough to cover the claim