Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Baumgart v. Andrews”
Baumgart v. Stony Brook Children's Service, P.C.public domain
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from two orders entered in the Eastern District of New York (Hurley, J.), on September 9, 2005, 2005 WL 2179429, and on July 6, 2006. The first of these orders dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the second denied Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural hi
Baumgart v. Charms (In re Charms)public domain
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND DECISION WILLIAM J. O’NEILL, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff-Trustee’s motion to determine validity, amount and priority of the lien claim of George P. Zam-pelli, Defendant. This matter emanates from an adversary proceeding to set aside conveyances, determine liens and sell real property at 124 Pheasant Lane, Hunting Valley, Ohio. Judgment on the complaint to sell
Goeke v. Baumgartpublic domain
Alice C. Goeke and certain other parties, plaintiffs below, creditors of the estate of Otto E. Baumgart, deceased, instituted this suit in the district court of Washington county against Ernest H. Baumgart, individually and as executor of the estate of Otto E. Baumgart, deceased, and against the surviving children of the deceased, and against Southland Life Insurance Company, Texas Mutual Life Association of Waco, and the Grimes County Mutual Life Association — a creditors' suit —
King v. Warner Pac. Coll., an Or. Corp.public domain
JAMES, J., concurring. This case comes before us in the deeply troubling posture of admitted religious discrimination. After plaintiff filed suit, Warner Pacific admitted it discriminated against him on the basis of his religion, but claimed that its otherwise unlawful act was permissible under ORS 659A.006(4), which provides, in part: "It is not an unlawful employment practice for a bona f
Kotelnikov v. Portland Habilitation Centerpublic domain
(2008) Anatoliy KOTELNIKOV, Plaintiff, v. PORTLAND HABILITATION CENTER, an Oregon corporation, Defendant. Civil No. 06-1679-AA. United States District Court, D. Oregon. March 3, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER AIKEN, District Judge. Pending before the court is Portland Habilitation Center's ("defendant") motion for summary judgment. <
Andrew Alexander v. John Hedbackpublic domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. After more than thirteen years of litigation, a bankruptcy court ordered that the property located at 875 Laurel Avenue in St. Paul, Minnesota, be vacated and au *764 thorized the United States Marshals to “physically remove, by force if necessary, [the debtors] and any oth
Opinion LIU, J. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (Hartford) issued a commercial general liability policy to Swift Distribution, Inc., doing business as Ultimate Support Systems (Ultimate), that covered “personal and advertising injury.” This term included claims arising from “[ojral, written, or electronic publication of material that slanders or libels a p
Miller v. Holzmannpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge. Currently pending and ready for resolution is Relator Richard F. Miller’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Defendant Bill L. Harbert and Memorandum in Support Thereof For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied. Rule 33(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that interrogatories be a
Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Zurich American Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. In this insurance coverage dispute a mine owner seeks to be considered an additional insured on policies issued to one of its contractors. Two workers injured in a crane accident on the property have sued the mine owner in Wyoming. The insurance policies were issued to a contractor who did work on the site before the men were injured.
JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. An association of Brazilian health insurance providers sued Stryker, a Michigan corporation that manufactures and distributes medical devices, alleging that Stryker's fraudulent and improper payments to Brazilian doctors increased the cost of providing healthcare. The district court dismissed the case under the doctrine of for um non conveniens
LOURIE, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in a patent infringement case involving disposable baby diapers. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. The Procter & Gamble Distrib. Co., No. C89-502WD (W.D.Wash. Sept. 10, 1991). The district court held that the Enloe pat
Simon v. Citimortgage, Inc. (In Re Doubov)public domain
423 B.R. 505 (2010) In re Vyacheslav DOUBOV and Larisa Doubov, Debtors. David O. Simon, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Citimortgage, Inc., Successor by Merger to ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-12594. Adversary No. 09-1200. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 8, 2010. *5
Castro v. 32BJ UNIONpublic domain
800 F.Supp.2d 586 (2011) Jose CASTRO, Plaintiff, v. 32 BJ UNION, Defendant. No. 11 Civ. 1342(AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 5, 2011. *587 Jose Castro, New York, NY, pro se. Lyle Douglas Rowen, New York, NY, for Defendant. *588 OPINION AND O
Glenn v. BP P.L.C.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. Plaintiff Robert R. Glenn, a resident of the state of Oregon, brings this putative *758class action lawsuit against Defendant BP p.l.c. (“BP” or the “Company”), alleging that it wrongfully cancelled a previously declared dividend following the Deepwater Horizon disaster. This is the
James B. Nutter & Co. v. DeGiacomo (In re Reznikov)public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. Appellant James B, Nutter & Company (“Nutter”) appeals a final judgment of the Bankruptcy Court denying its motion for summary judgment and entering summary judgment in favor of Appellee Mark G. DeGiacomo, the trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Fanni Reznikov. For the reasons set forth below, the Court affirms the judgment of the bankruptcy court.
Suhar v. Bruno (In re Neal)public domain
OPINION C. KATHRYN PRESTON, Bankruptcy Judge. At issue in this appeal is whether the debtor received reasonably equivalent value when she transferred property to her husband in a pre-petition separation agreement which was incorporated into a marriage dissolution decree. The chapter 7 trustee alleged that she did not and that the transfer was avoidable under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1)(B) and Ohio Revised Code §
Kathy Schwab v. Paul Schwabpublic domain
2021 WI 67 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP1200 COMPLETE TITLE: In re the marriage of: Kathy Schwab, n/k/a Siech, Petitioner-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Paul Schwab, Respondent-Appellant.
Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Zurich American Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. Plaintiff Thunder Basin Coal Company, L.L.C. seeks a declaratory judgment that defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh is required to defend and indemnify it against a separate lawsuit, under an “additional insured” provision of a commercial umbrella policy. Thunder Basin was sued in the United States District Cou
Nurse Midwifery Associates v. Hibbettpublic domain
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. This case involves two appeals arising out of an antitrust action brought by two nurse midwives, the obstetrician with whom they had affiliated, and three of their clients, against three Nashville hospitals, certain members of the medical staffs from two of the hospitals, another practicing obstetrician in Nashville, and a physician-controlled insurance company. Plaintiffs alleged that these de
Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 20, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00101-CV THE CARDIO GROUP, LLC, CARDIOLOGY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA LLC, AND CARDIOCLOUD, LLC, Appellants V. JACOB B. KRING AND HEDRICK KRING, PLL