Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Bash v. Racin”
Bash v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurancepublic domain
38 Wis.2d 440 (1968) BASH, by Guardian ad litem, and others, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, Defendants and Respondents: READY and another, Impleaded Defendants and Appellants. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. February 27, 1968. April 9, 1968. *444 For the defendants-appell
752 F.2d 307 BARRINGTON PRESS, INC., an Illinois corporation,Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee,v.Richard W. MOREY and Diana W. Morey,Defendants-Counterplaintiffs-Cross-Complainants-Appellants,v.Phillip E. BASH, Cross-Defendant-Appellant. No. 83-2501. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 13, 1984.Decided Jan. 10, 1985.
Gonzalez v. Google LLCpublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 617–622 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 18, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
BRENNAN, J. ¶ 1 *584This is an appeal of an order that granted summary judgment and dismissed as time-barred a WIS. STAT. § 242.04(1)(a) (2015-16)1 claim alleging a fraudulent transfer. WISCONSIN STAT. § 893.425 bars "an action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ch. 242" that is not commenced
Doe v. Amherst Collegepublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS MASTROIANNI, United States District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff, an individual proceeding under the pseudonym “John Doe”1 and the son of Asian-American immigrants, enrolled at Amherst College (the “College”) as a first-year student in the fall of 2010. In October of 2018 he was inf
Stephen Kolbe v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.public domain
AGEE, Circuit Judge, wrote a separate opinion as to Part TV, in which Judge KING concurred in the judgment: The Equal Protection Clause guarantees that no state shall “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § l.13 It does not follow, however, that all classifications are forbidden. Instead, the Equal Protection Claus
Glenn R. Schultz v. Daniel Thomas and Carl Pavilonispublic domain
BAUER, Chief Judge. During the early morning hours of November 14, 1981, in the City of Racine, Wisconsin, the defendant, Racine City Police Officer Daniel Thomas, observed a traffic violation committed by the plaintiff, Glenn Schultz. Officer Thomas pursued Schultz in his squad car, apprehending the plaintiff’s vehicle following a short chase. A caustic exchange ensued between T
Barrington Press, Inc. v. Moreypublic domain
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.** This case involves a contract dispute over the sale of a small publishing business. Plaintiff-Appellee, Barrington Press, Inc. (“Barrington”), an assignee to seller A.B. Morse Company (“Morse”), sued buyers, Defendants-Appellants, Richard and Diana Morey (the “Moreys”), for the balance due on the sales contract. The Moreys defended on grounds that the contra
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
WEDEMEYER, P.J. Lenzy Wilson appeals from a judgment of conviction finding him guilty of armed robbery, party to a crime, as a habitual offender, contrary to secs. 943.32(l)(b) and (2), 939.05 and 939.62, Stats. Wilson also appeals from an order denying his request for postconviction relief. Wilson presents the *667following issues for our review: (1) Was Wilson denied his
Shoemaker v. Marc's Big Boypublic domain
51 Wis.2d 611 (1971) 187 N.W.2d 815 SHOEMAKER and husband, Appellants, v. MARC'S BIG BOY and others, Respondents.[*] No. 242. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued June 1, 1971. Decided June 25, 1971. *614 For the appellants there was a brief by Rudolph & Moore of Milwau
Jones v. National Council of Young Men's Christian Associations of the United States of Americapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiffs James Jones, Nicole Steels, Kavon Ward, and Iona Toles have filed this suit on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated employees of the National Council of Young Men’s Christian Associations of the United States of America (the ‘Y”), alleging claims of race discrimination and retaliation against the Y and
People v. Wardpublic domain
609 N.E.2d 252 (1992) 154 Ill.2d 272 181 Ill.Dec. 884 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Jerry WARD, Appellant. No. 68274. Supreme Court of Illinois. November 19, 1992. Rehearing Denied March 29, 1993. *256 Randolph N. Stone and Rita A. Fry, Public De
Seifert v. Muellerpublic domain
Bashes, J. This action was brought to recover a commission on the exchange of real estate. The plaintiff claimed to have been employed to make the sale or exchange by one Richter, the agent of the defendant. The plaintiff recovered ••and defendant appeals. The defendant urges in this court (1) that Richter had no authority to employ plaintiff in her behalf, and (2) that plaintiff agreed to accept and receive as his compensation a
Miner v. Braderpublic domain
Lyon, J. This is an action of ejectment to recover several small parcels of land situated within the recorded plat of the village of Mount Yernon, in Dane county. A trial without a jury resulted in a judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals. The village of Mount Yernon was platted by one Britts, in 1851, and the plat was recorded in 1852. It consists of nine blocks, of uniform size, one of w
Cunningham v. Brownpublic domain
OktoN, J. The evidence in this case was very conflicting, and imposed upon the circuit court the duty of determining its credibility and weight, by tests which can only be applied by the court which has the advantage of hearing the testimony from the lips of witnesses, arid of observing their manner and appearance upon the stand. It would be a most unsafe rule to determine the weight and preponderance of evidence in any case by th
Slack v. Statepublic domain
The appellant in this case was indicted by the grand jury of Comanche County, charged with pursuing the occupation of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary. The defendant filed a motion in the trial court to quash the indictment, which was by the court overruled, and to this action of the court defendant objects as his first ground in his motion for a new trial. In this case a very able brief has