Cases

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge. In these appeals we are asked once again to interpret certain provisions of the agreement by which the parties to the Pulaski County, Arkansas, school-desegregation ease settled their dispute. The question presented is whether changes made by the State of Arkansas in the funding of retirement and health insurance for teachers violated that agreement. The Little Rock School District, the Pulask

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

Cite as 2014 Ark. 418 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-13-293 Opinion Delivered October 9, 2014 PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI BRENDON BARTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPELLANT [NO. 60CR-11-3134] V.

WILSON, District Judge. INDEX Page I. Introduction .992 II. The Long History Of Desegregation Litigation In Pulaski County t> O 03 A. 1956 Through 1973 . t-05 03 B. Events leading to the initiation of this action. O 03 03 C. Inter district Litigation And Inter district Relief. O O O t*H D. The 1990 Settl

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

237 F.Supp.2d 988 (2002) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Plaintiff v. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. Defendants Mrs. Lorene Joshua, et al. Intervenors Katherine Knight, et al. Intervenors No. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas. Little Rock Division. September 13, 2002. Order Modifying Denial on Reconsidera

551 S.W.2d 537 (1977) MIDWEST LIME COMPANY, Petitioner, v. INDEPENDENCE COUNTY CHANCERY COURT and Robert Dudley, Judge Thereof, Respondent. No. 76-380. Supreme Court of Arkansas, Division 2. May 31, 1977. *538 Barber, McCaskill, Amsler & Jones, Little Rock, Harkey, Walmsley & Belew, Batesville, for petitioner. Davi

148 F.3d 956 127 Ed. Law Rep. 740 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff--Appellee,Servicemaster Management Services, Intervenor Plaintiff,Blytheville School District; Bryant School District; FortSmith School District; West Memphis School District;Altus-Denning School District; Ashdown School District;Barton-Lexa School District; Batesville School District;Biggers-Reyno School District; Bla

138 F.3d 1264 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff,Servicemaster Management Services; Blytheville SchoolDistrict; Bryant School District; Fort Smith SchoolDistrict; West Memphis School District; Altus-DenningSchool District; Ashdown School District; Barton-LexaSchool District; Batesville School District; Biggers-ReynoSchool District; Black Rock School District; Bright StarSchool District; Brinkley School Di

PER CURIAM. Robert L. Barton appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For reversal, Barton contends that he was denied due process because the sentencing judge relied on erroneous information in the presentenee report. We reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opin

RONEY, Chief Judge: This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus in a capital case, the tragic facts of which have been referred to as “unusual and bizarre.” Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997, 999 (Fla.1981). On July 17, 1974, Askari Abdullah Muhammad, formerly known as Thomas Knight, abducted Sydney Gans, a wealthy Miami business man on his way to work, forced him to return to his home and held his wif

Cite as 2024 Ark. 34 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-326 RONALD DAVID KIMBROUGH AND Opinion Delivered: March 28, 2024 MITZI KIMBROUGH, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER APPEAL FROM THE BENTON SIMILARLY SITUATED TAXPAYERS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 04CV-21-2250] APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES HONORABLE GARY ARNOLD, V.

714 P.2d 265 (1986) 77 Or.App. 677 Sheldon Scott DONACA, Appellant, v. CURRY COUNTY, Respondent. 84-1587, CA A34548. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted November 14, 1985. Decided February 12, 1986. Reconsideration Denied March 28, 1986. Review Allowed April 22, 1986. Linda M. Se

Cite as 2022 Ark. 160 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-22-439 Opinion Delivered: September 22, 2022 JODY HARRIS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FRANKLIN V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 24OCV-22-60] CR

132 F.3d 422 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,503 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,Flanders Electric Motor Service, Inc., Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellant,Liberty Motor and Machinery Company, Intervenor Plaintiff,Bradford Electric Company; Roy G. Letourneau Company; JohnBenson Electric Company; Cotter Electric Company; ChicagoElectric Company; Delta-Y Electric Company; WhitfieldElectric; Pow

Smith, J. The court house of Crittenden County needing repairs, the county court appointed an agent to have the same made. This agent let the work to Swepston, under a contract, by which he agreed, on behalf of the county, to pay $850 in currency, or $1,700 in county warrants, these last being then worth in the market only fifty cents in the dollar. The work was completed, but a portion of it not having be

A petition was filed in the county court at Jonesboro, by owners of real property, asking for the formation of a drainage district. Certain taxpayers *Page 174 filed remonstrance, and the circuit court, after a hearing, found that all of the real property included within the proposed district would be greatly enhanced in value and the health of the residents greatly improved, public roads and highways benefited, and it would be to the advantage of the own

Stephenson, J. The writ issued in this case has brought the record of the county court of Jefferson, relative to the levy of taxes for 1872, before us for review. The plaintiffs allege the illegality of that item of the levy, imposing a tax of three mills on the dollar to pay certain bonds issued to one Twombly in payment for a farm purchased by the county, pursuant to an ac

English, C. J. The appellant was indicted in the criminal court of Pulaski county, as follows: “The grand jury of Pulaski county, in the name and by the authority of the state of Arkansas,.accuse John Barton of the crime of larceny, committed as follows, viz. : The said John Barton, on the ninth day of July, A. D. 1872, in the county and state aforesaid, one hundred and thirty dol

Appellant seeks to recover $613.24 alleged to be the balance due him from respondent for the last 4¾ months of the year 1919, and for the years 1920, 1921, 1922 and 1923, on his salary as court reporter of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit. The population of the counties comprising this circuit was as follows: Crawford County, 12,355; Dent County, 12,318; Laclede County, *Page 228 16,857; Phelps County, 14,941; Pulaski County, 10,940; Texas County, 20,