Cases

Filed 10/26/20; Opinion on transfer from Supreme Court CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D072639 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCN331782) JEFFREY SCOTT BARTON, Defendant and Appe

Filed 7/17/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D072639 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCN331782) JEFFREY SCOTT BARTON, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgm

REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Appellees. For the reason stated below, we AFFIRM the decision of the district court. I. BACKGROUND The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) appeals from the district court’s dis

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc (FRAP and Local Rule 35), the Suggestion for Rehearing En

OPINION WALKER, Chief Justice. Appellant Joe Barton entered an agreed plea of guilt to the offense of possessing 400 or more grams of cocaine with a recommendation of twenty years’ confinement and no fine from the State. This appeal only tests the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Motion to Suppress. Point of error one contends that the trial court erred in denying the motion to supp

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court's order dismissing their amended complaint for lack of standing and imposing sanctions under rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. Further, they appeal the trial court's orders that denied their (1) motion to treat defendants' rule 11 motion as a motion for summary judgment, (2) motion to disqualify defendants' counsel and compel counsel to disgorge its fees, (3) motion to compel individual defendants to pay their own legal fees, and (4) motio

104 F.3d 700 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its CorporateCapacity, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Gerald C. BARTON; Gerald G. Rothman; William W. Vaughan;Peter R. Kirwin-Taylor; Gilbert I. Newman; Jack G. Golsen;Norman L. Peck; Bernard Ille; Albert Reichmann; Joe W.Walser, Jr.; and Joseph V. Olree, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-30926. United States Court of Appeals,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-0784 Filed June 19, 2019 JOHN BARTON GOPLERUD, LESLIE CLEMENSON, LYLE HALE, and DOROTHY HALE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA, DALLAS COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, and NAPA VALLEY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dallas County,

The appellant, Mrs. Kittie Carr, was plaintiff in the court below, and, on June 17, 1933, filed her bill in the chancery court of Attala county to confirm a tax title to property in said county described as follows: House and west half of lot seven, and ten feet of lot eight, and one and one-half feet west side of the east half of lot seven, section thirty-four, township fifteen, range eight; house and two-acre lot in section thirty-four, township fifteen, range eight; north one-half of the n

Including the note and mortgage to the defendants, the plaintiff paid the stipulated price for the farm. He was not injured by his mistaken supposition, however caused, that the farm was mortgaged directly to the defendants. It was immaterial to him by what means, whether by fraud or otherwise, his vendor was induced to require, or to consent, that a part of the purchase-money should be paid to the defendants. Upon the allegations of the bill as it stands, the plaintiff, however it might be w

This appeal is prosecuted on an agreed statement under article 1414, Revised Statutes. A copy of the agreement is as follows, viz.: "1. On November 12, 1890, plaintiff instituted this action in the County Court of Dallas County, Texas, against the defendant, W.W. Walker, for the value of goods, wares, and merchandise, aggregating $646.88, sold defendant by plaintiff at various times during the year 1890. "2. March 14, 1891, plaintiff filed a first amended original petition, from

1. A county acts under delegated powers, and has only such powers as are conferred by statute. Albany Bottling Co. v. Watson, 103 Ga. 503 (30 S.E. 270); Town of Decatur v. DeKalb County, 130 Ga. 483, 487 (61 S.E. 23); Bowers v. Hanks, 152 Ga. 659</

This is an original proceeding in this court brought by Sheffield Steel Corporation and Consolidated Underwriters, as petitioners, to obtain a review of an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of the respondent Isaac Barton. The respondent, on February 26, 1937, while engaged in the operation of a switch engine for the petitioner Sheffield Steel Corporation, sustained an accidental personal injury which resulted in the total loss of his left leg by amputation. The inj

McCulloch, C. J. Appellant M. F. Barton instituted this action in the ¡chancery court of Pope County to establish and quiet her title to certain lands lying in that county, and also a large amount of personal property, all of which she claims by inheritance from .her brother, J. K. Bowers, who died without lineal heirs. A portion of the lands owned by decedent, J. K. Bowers, came to him by in

Hamer, J. Tins is an appeal from a decree of the district court for Richardson county. The plaintiff, appellee, seeks to establish a roadway between his premises, the north half of the southwest quarter of section 12, in toAvnship 1, in range .16, Richardson county, Nebraska, and a public road running along the south line of the 80-acre tract adjoining-on the south. The plaintiff and his grantors have OAvned tlie 80-acre tract

WILSON, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining the *340action of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in ordering the petitioner to pay a deficiency tax for the calendar year of 1921. Some time in 1920, Mitsui & Co., Ltd., of Japan, ordered of the petitioner two very large machi

HOCH, J. *459Defendant Jeremy Luke Hendrix entered a plea of no contest to driving with a blood-alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 or higher, admitted an allegation his BAC was 0.15 or higher, and was placed on informal probation. Prior to entering this plea, defendant moved to dismiss the case pursuant to Penal Code 1 s

RAYE, P. J. *113According to the plain language of Health and Safety Code section 11362.1, enacted as part of Proposition 64, possession of less than an ounce of cannabis in prison is no longer a felony. Smoking or ingesting cannabis in prison remains a felony and prison regulations forbid possession. The Attorney General uses arcane rules of s

Ross, J.** *82*181Appellant Maurice Caldwell's 1991 second degree murder conviction was reversed when the trial court granted his habeas corpus petition. Caldwell's habeas petition alleged various grounds for relief-including the

Opinion ROBIE, J. A jury found defendant James David Allen guilty of escape for leaving his mother’s house, which was his assigned place of confinement under an alternative custody agreement. In challenging his escape conviction, defendant contends there was no substantial evidence that his failure to return