Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Barry Silverman”
United States v. Barry Silverman, A/K/A Barry Aiellopublic domain
96 F.3d 1436 U.S.v.Barry Silverman, a/k/a Barry Aiello NO. 94-2135 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. July 31, 1996 Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 94-cr-00088, Joyner, J. 1 AFFIRMED.
Hernandez v. Silvermanpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellant filed a petition for injunction against domestic violence against appellee, her ex-fiancé. At the scheduled evidentia-ry hearing, the trial court sua sponte decided that the allegations in the petition were insufficient and, without conducting a full evidentiary hearing, denied the petition. We reverse and remand for a full evidentiary hearing. The allegations were pled with sufficient specificity and,
Silverman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Daniel Palmieri, J. This motion by defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Company for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 dismissing so much of the plaintiffs’ complaint that seeks punitive damages and/or statutorily mandated damages (sequence No. 001) is granted and such claims are dismissed; the motion by defendant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company and the American Insurance Company, er
Silverman v. Barrypublic domain
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Silverman v. Barrypublic domain
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Lopez v. Silvermanpublic domain
14 F.Supp.2d 405 (1998) Jose LOPEZ, Arturo Flores, and Rufina Herrera Vargas, Plaintiffs, v. Barry SILVERMAN, individually d/b/a RENAISSANCE SPORTSWEAR, LTD.; Richard Pak; Peter Pak; Tuk Cha Pak, individually d/b/a Woo Brothers, Inc.; and Han Byul, Inc., Defendants. No. 96 CIV. 9263(DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 23, 1998.
Silverman v. Cejaspublic domain
PER CURIAM. The appellants, who were the plaintiffs below, appeal the trial court’s dismissal, with prejudice, of the Second Amended Complaint in a derivative suit filed by stockholders of two corporations. Finding that the Second Amended Complaint sets forth a prima facia cause of action, and noting that the record is devoid of any basis justifying a dismissal of that Complaint, we reverse the trial c
Barry Fiala, Inc. v. Card USA, Inc.public domain
292 F.Supp.2d 1009 (2003) BARRY FIALA, INC., Plaintiff, v. CARD USA, INC. Defendant. No. 02-2167 M1/A. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. December 4, 2003. *1010 Richard M. Carter, Esq., Martin Tate Morrow & Marston, Russell H. Walker, Esq., Walker McKenzie & Walker, P.C., Lauri M. Hays, Marti
Whitnell v. Silvermanpublic domain
592 So.2d 429 (1991) Lorraine S. Whitnell, Wife of/and James WHITNELL v. Dr. Arthur SILVERMAN, et al. No. 91-CA-0426. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. December 11, 1991. Rehearing Denied February 12, 1992. *430 Russ M. Herman, Mark R. Wolfe, John B. Loweb, Charles O. Taylor, Herman, Herman, Katz &
Silverman v. J.R.L. Food Corp.public domain
PER CURIAM. Petitioner Daniel Silverman, as a Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”), appeals from so much of an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Richard Conway Casey, Judge, as denied his petition for a temporary injunction reinstating Alba Cortes to her employment with respondent J.R.L. Food Corp. (“JRL”) pending the outcome of
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA. MIKVA, Circuit Judge: Appellants in this case are suing the District of Columbia for denying them permission to convert a rental apartment building they own to cooperative or condominium apartments. They bring both constitutional and statutory claims, and challenge both the District’s actions and the
GREGORY MIRMELLI v. HARVEY SILVERMAN, etc.public domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 24, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-1175 Lower Tribunal No. 17-26140 ________________ Gregory Mirmelli, Appellant,
Silverman v. Mirandapublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER Ramos, District Judge This is a decade-long dispute between two employee benefit funds concerning the right to contributions made by employers pursuant to a number of collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”). Plaintiffs are the trustees of the Union Mutual Medical Fund (“UMMF”) and the UMMF (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants are the trustees of the Teamsters Local 210 Affiliat
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc: Any time the state gives a group of persons power to prevent an action by another — if the group’s majority or some other proportion wishes to do so — the state increases the bargaining power of that group vis-a-vis the proponent of action. I am inclined to agree with the D.C. Court of Appeals that the constitutionality of this kind o
Silverman v. Niswongerpublic domain
761 F.Supp. 464 (1991) Sidney SILVERMAN, Lee Silverman, Barry P. August, Samuel August, and Judi Ellias, Plaintiffs, v. Thomas R. NISWONGER, George F. Field, Jr., Field Corporation, a Michigan corporation, Your Attic, Inc., a Michigan corporation, Your Attic Properties, Inc., a Michigan corporation, Your Attic Management, Inc., a Michigan corporation, Your Attic of Clinton Township, a Michigan limited partnership, and Your Attic of Tampa, a Flori
Becker v. Silvermanpublic domain
638 F.Supp. 193 (1986) Barry BECKER, Plaintiff, v. Robert SILVERMAN, Defendant. No. 85 Civ. 6757 (CHT). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 24, 1986. *194 Mark M. Horowitz, Floral Park, N.Y., for plaintiff. Harold Wm. Suckenik, New York City, for defendant. OPINION TENNEY, District Jud
Silverman v. CBS, INC.public domain
675 F.Supp. 870 (1988) Stephen M. SILVERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CBS, INC., Defendant. No. 84 Civ. 1894 (GLG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 5, 1988. Barry I. Fredericks, White Plains, N.Y., for plaintiff. Moses & Singer, New York City. By: David Rabinowitz, of counsel, for defendant. *871
Silverman v. Superior Courtpublic domain
203 Cal.App.3d 145 (1988) 249 Cal. Rptr. 724 GILBERT SILVERMAN, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent; GALPER REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. B032159. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. July 27, 1988. *147 COUNSE
Silverman v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
650 N.E.2d 603 (1995) 272 Ill.App.3d 490 208 Ill.Dec. 909 Michael SILVERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECONOMY FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-93-1334. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. May 8, 1995. Fishman & Fishman & Saltzberg, P.C. (Gerald B. Saltzberg, John C. P
Silverman v. CBS, INC.public domain
666 F.Supp. 575 (1987) Stephen M. SILVERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CBS INC., Defendant. No. 84 Civ 1894 (GLG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 3, 1987. Law Offices of Barry I. Fredericks, New York City (Barry I. Fredericks, Jonathan D. Davis, of counsel), for plaintiff. Moses & Singer, New York City (David Rabinowitz, Stanley Rothenberg, of co