Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Barry J. Stone”
Stone v. 350 Encinitas Investments, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * A business known as 350 Encinitas, LLC (“LLC”), filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. A plan of reorganization was confirmed in 2003, and the bankruptcy court administratively closed its file in 2005. Thereafter, the previous owner of the LLC filed claims against the LLC, and others, in state court. Eventually some of the parties, including the LLC, reached a settlement agreement involving the state
Stone v. 350 Encinitas Investments, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * A business known as 350 Encinitas, LLC (“LLC”), filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. A plan of reorganization was confirmed in 2003, and the bankruptcy court administratively closed its file in 2005. Thereafter, the previous owner of the LLC filed claims against the LLC, and others, in state court. Eventually some of the parties, including the LLC, reached a settlement agreement involving the state
Grede v. FC Stone, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James B. Zagel, United States District Judge The instant adversary proceeding was chosen as a “test case” to resolve common legal issues among the Trustee’s actions in the bankruptcy proceedings of Sentinel Managément Group, Inc. (“Sentinel”). In this five-count action, the Trustee seeks to avoid or reduce the transfer of approximately $15.6 million to Defendant FC Stone, LLC
Barry v. Pmc Film Canada, Inc.public domain
DECISION Defendant PMC Group, Inc. ("PMC Group") moves to dismiss the breach of contract and duty of good faith claims asserted against it on three grounds: (1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1); (2) lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2); and (3) failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Super. R. Civ. P. Finding that Plaintiff Thomas Barry ("Pla
M & M Stone Co. v. Pennsylvaniapublic domain
OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge. M & M Stone Co. (“M & M”) appeals from an order of the District Court dismissing its claims for constitutional and state law violations against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”), the Telford Borough Authority (“TBA”), Spotts Stevens & McCoy, Inc., and the Delaware River Basin Commission (“DRBC”).1
In Re Stone Barn Manhattan LLCpublic domain
398 B.R. 359 (2008) In re STONE BARN MANHATTAN LLC, f/k/a Steve & Barry's LLC, et al., Debtors. No. 08-12579 (ALG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. December 17, 2008. Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP by Shai Y. Waisman, Esq., Victoria Von, Esq., Adam P. Strochak, Esq., New York, NY, Attorneys for the Debtors. Cooley Godward Kronish, LLP by Brent I.
Rohrbough v. Stonepublic domain
189 F.Supp.2d 1088 (2001) Brian E. ROHRBOUGH, Susan A. Petrone, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Daniel Rohrbough, deceased, Donald F. Fleming, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Kelly Fleming, deceased, Diedra A. Fleming, Joseph R. Kechter, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Matthew Joseph Kechter, deceased, Ann Marie Kechter, Dawn L. Anna, individually and as personal repre
Russell v. Stonepublic domain
PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. See United States v. Serrano, 607 F.2d 1145 (5th Cir.1979). BERANEK, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.
Rohrbough v. Stonepublic domain
189 F.Supp.2d 1144 (2002) Brian E. ROHRBOUGH, Susan A. Petrone, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Daniel Rohrbough, deceased, Donald F. Fleming, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Kelly Fleming, deceased, Diedra A. Fleming, Erin Fleming, Joseph R. Kechter, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Matthew Joseph Kechter, deceased, Ann Marie Kechter, Adam D. Kechter, a minor child, by
Stone Hedge Properties v. Phoenix Capital Corp.public domain
OPINION WEIS, Circuit Judge. This appeal grows out of a dispute between the developer of a golf course and various individuals and entities, including PNC Bank, who were involved in the financing of the project. Summary judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and that ruling was affirmed by this Court on appeal. Years later, the plaintiff moved to have the judgment vacated because the
Elmhurst Chicago Stone Co. v. Novakpublic domain
PRESIDING JUSTICE O’MALLEY delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs, the City of Warrenville and Robert Johnson, sued defendant, John Lotus Novak, the Du Page County Treasurer, to compel him to distribute certain tax money to a tax increment financing (TIF) district in Warrenville, Illinois, rather than to all the taxi
Stone v. Derwinskipublic domain
IVERS, Associate Judge: Appellant, Claude R. Stone, appeals from a March 15, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which waived one fourth of the loan guaranty indebtedness and interest debt owed by him to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The Court finds that the Board provided adequate reasons and bases for its decision not to grant a total waiver for appellant’s debt. The Board’s decision was nei
*968Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie (CPLR 5602).
Fisher v. Stonepublic domain
Fisher v Stone (2020 NY Slip Op 03092) Fisher v Stone 2020 NY Slip Op 03092 Decided on May 28, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<
Melis v. Blake Stone, LLCpublic domain
Melis v Blake Stone, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 02696) Melis v Blake Stone, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 02696 Decided on May 15, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<
State v. Stonepublic domain
JENSEN, Justice [¶1.] Jarod Stone appeals his convictions for second-degree murder, possession of a controlled substance, and possession of a firearm by a convicted drug offender. Stone argues the circuit court committed multiple errors in pretrial rulings and at trial, including: denying his motion to sever, allowing other acts evidence and certain opinion testimony to be introduced at
State v. Barrypublic domain
Johnson, J. ¶41 (dissenting) — A person charged criminally has a constitutional right to a fair trial and to require that the State establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt through testimony, evidence, and exhibits. It is a long-recognized element of a fair trial that the jury consider only relevant and competent evidence bearing on the issue of guilt or innocence. Today’s majority opinion abandons precedent and allows a convict
Phoenix Associates III v. Stonepublic domain
MESKILL, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to review eviden-tiary rulings in a jury trial involving certain oral business agreements. Phoenix Associates III and its general partners, Barry Silverstein, Dennis McGilli-cuddy and Stevens McVoy (Phoenix Associates) 1 appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Gagliardi, J
24 So.3d 805 (2010) COHEN & COHEN, P.A., COBIS, a Florida partnership, Bernard Cohen, individually, and Irwin Cohen, individually, Appellants, v. GERSON, PRESTON, ROBINSON & COMPANY, P.A., and Conrad Scherer, LLP, a Florida limited liability partnership, Appellee. No. 4D08-1479. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. January 6, 2010. John G. C
Jeffrey L. Roberts v. Barry Lynn Carterpublic domain
09/04/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 26, 2024 Session JEFFREY L. ROBERTS v. BARRY LYNN CARTER ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Benton County No. 20-CV-2 Bruce Irwin Griffey, Judge ___________________________________