Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00402-CV Jose Mario BALLESTEROS, Appellant v. Sonia Rocio BARRIENTOS,

30 Cal.App.4th 63 (1994) 35 Cal. Rptr.2d 520 THELMA BARRIENTOS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants; STEVEN B. STEVENS et al., Objectors and Appellants; THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent. Docket No. B075973. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. November 16, 1994.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 9, 2022 No. 04-19-00534-CV EP ENERGY E&P COMPANY L.P., Appellant v. STOREY MINERALS, LTD, Maltsberger/Storey Ranch, LLC, and Rene R. Barrientos, Ltd., Appellees

EN BANC PLURALITY OPINION ON REHEARING SCOTT BRISTER, Chief Justice. This case is part of the debris from a falling-out between attorneys who worked together on asbestos cases for almost twenty years. Generally, attorney Lawrence Madeksho signed up the clients and did the pretrial work, while Robert Ballard and the law firm of Abraham, Watkins, Nichols & Friend (“the law firm”) did most of the trial w

Affirmed and Opinion filed _____________, 2002 Rehearing En Banc Granted; Opinion of September 19, 2002 Vacated; Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part; En Banc Plurality and Dissenting Opinions on Rehearing filed July 10, 2003.

762 S.W.2d 314 (1988) CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Appellant, v. Gilbert Roland VELA, Appellee. No. 04-87-00683-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. December 7, 1988. Rehearing Denied December 30, 1988. *316 Paula Dlugosz, Asst. City Atty., San Antonio, for appellant. W. Burl Brock, Catherine M. Stone, Watk

9 Cal.App.4th 70 (1992) 11 Cal. Rptr.2d 454 ESTHER MILLER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CECILIA P. STOUFFER, Defendant and Appellant; MARIA BARRIENTOS, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. B055890. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. August 31, 1992. *74 COUNSEL Nelson,

735 S.W.2d 241 (1987) Ana B. RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. C-6238. Supreme Court of Texas. June 17, 1987. Rehearing Denied September 16, 1987. W. Burl Brock and Catherine M. Stone, Watkins, Mireles, Brock & Barrientos, San Antonio, for petitioner. John Milano, Jr., Thornton, Summers, Biechlin,

699 S.W.2d 275 (1985) Joe Rolando GARZA and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Appellants, v. Juanita V. SERRATO and Floresvinda Gutierrez, Appellees. No. 04-84-00156-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. September 30, 1985. Rehearing Denied October 24, 1985. *276 Hubert W. Green, San Antonio, Jeremiah I.

02/19/1986 App for WOE / Disposed NRE 06/04/1986 Motion for Rehearing Disposed OVERRULED ON APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that appellants should have perfected their appeal from the first judgment entered in this cause rather than from the second judgment. We do not agree and deny the motion to dismiss. This appeal arises from a personal injury claim in which final judgment was signed on O

CLARK, Chief Judge: Rebecca L. Box (Box) brought this action against Ferrellgas, Inc. (Ferrellgas). Box claimed that Ferrellgas’s negligence caused the death of her husband Gregory and her son David. A jury awarded Box $2,175,-694.00 for loss of companionship and society, pecuniary loss, loss of inheritance, and mental anguish. Ferrellgas appeals. We vacate the judgment appeal

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00721-CV Robert PEREZ and Ramiro Perez, Jr., Appellants v. Mauro BERLANGA, Appe

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge, concurring in denial of rehearing en banc. I believe the panel opinion and dissent, Gaitan v. Holder, 671 F.3d 678 (8th Cir. 2012), erred in refusing to decide whether the Board of Immigration Appeals in Matter of S-E-G- 24 I & N. Dec. 579, 582 (BIA 2008), validly declared “social visibility” and “particularity” to be “requirements” of a “particular social group”

Appellate Case: 24-3153 Document: 44 Date Filed: 06/23/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH June 23, 2025 UN

[Cite as Colby v. Colby, 2016-Ohio-2903.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PATRICIA F. COLBY JUDGES: Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellant Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. John W. Wise,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CASEY TAYLOR; ANGELINA No. 16-35205 TAYLOR, husband and wife and the marital community D.C. No. composed thereof, 2:11-cv-01289-JLR Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ORDER CERTIFYING A BURLINGTON NORTHERN QUESTION TO THE RAILROAD HOLDINGS INC., a W

[Cite as Beringer v. Beringer, 2014-Ohio-5232.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JAMES BERINGER JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. C

[Cite as Moellering Industries, Inc. v. Nalagatla, 2013-Ohio-3995.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY MOELLERING INDUSTRIES, INC., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2012-10-104 : OPINION

Affirm and Opinion Filed August 19, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00556-CR ALEJANDRO AMOLES JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas

*833ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXCLUDE JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION On the eve of trial, Defendants1 have brought a Motion to Exclude Protected Information from the Trial of this Action (“Motion” or “Motion to Exclude”) asking the Court to exclude virtually all of the evidence and