Cases

673 S.E.2d 126 (2009) QUEZADA-BARRERA v. The STATE. No. A08A1869. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 28, 2009. George H. Law, III, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Deborah R. Fluker, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. SMITH, Presiding Judge. Francisco Quezada-Barrera appeals from his conviction for possessing cocaine

638 F.Supp.2d 1108 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Daniel Martin BARRERA-OMANA. No. 09-CR-47 (JMR/JJK). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. July 23, 2009. Christian S. Wilton, United States Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff. *1109 ORDER JAMES M. ROSENBAUM, District Judge.

PER CURIAM: IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion to expedite the appeal is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s motion to vacate and remand in light of USA v. Booker is granted.

*789MEMORANDUM** Defendants-Appellants Elias Miguel Barrera-Medina, Miguel HernandezMunguia, Martin Perez-Estrada, Lino Hernandez, Timoteo Valle, Jr., and Gabriel Ortiz-Villalobos appeal their convictions and sentences for various drug and firearm offenses relating primarily to a conspiracy to purchase approximately one million pseudoephedrine pills to m

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 543 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 544 Michael V. Barrera appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of forgery of a check (Pen. Code, §

139 F.Supp.2d 136 (2001) Daniel BARRERA, Plaintiff v. TOWN OF BROWNVILLE, et al., Defendants No. 00-CV-159-B-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. May 18, 2001. *137 *138 John P. Gause, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Plaintiffs. Mark V. Franco, Thompson & Bowie,

WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Jose Abonce-Barrera appeals from his convictions for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1557 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1558 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPL

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00167-CR Ruben BARRERA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 30, 2020 No. 04-20-00167-CR Ruben BARRERA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

LYNN, District Judge: Appellant Daniel Barrera-Saucedo appeals the district court’s sentence on two grounds. The first ground is that the district court erred in concluding that it had no authority to depart downward for the time Barrera-Saucedo had served in state custody after immigration authorities found him. The second ground is that the

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 08/04/2017 09:08 AM CDT - 647 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports STATE v. BARRERA-GARRIDO Cite as 296 Neb. 647 State of Nebraska, appe

NIELSEN, District Judge: In each of these cases, the government appeals from the judgment dismissing the indictments on drug charges against appel-lees on the ground of outrageous government conduct. A jury convicted Kunkel and Ruiz, but the indictment was dismissed before sentencing. The indictment against Barrera and Herndon was dismissed before trial. We reverse. I. BACKGROUND T

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 11, 2016 No. 04-16-00272-CR Gabriel Barrera ZAMARRIPA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-74,898-01

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00272-CR Gabriel Barrera ZAMARRIPA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,

Opinion issued December 17, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00982-CR ——————————— JUAN CARLOS BARRERA-MAGANA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-74,898-01 <

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] David Barrera appealed a district court order committing him to the custody of the Department of Human Services as a sexually dangerous individual. We affirm. I. [¶ 2] In 1995, Barrera was convicted of gross sexual imposition for an incident involving a seven-year-old female. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment and released in 2004. While incarcerat

ACCEPTED 01-14-00982-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/14/2015 5:36:45 PM No. 01-14-00982-CR CHRISTOPHER PRINE