Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Barnett v. Sylacauga Autoplex”
Barnett v. Sylacauga Autoplexpublic domain
973 F.Supp. 1358 (1997) Linda BARNETT, Plaintiff, v. SYLACAUGA AUTOPLEX, et al., Defendants. No. CV 97-PT-1216-E. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. August 5, 1997. *1359 *1360 W. Braxton Schell, Jr., Joe R. Whatley, Jr. & R. Jackson Drake, Cooper Mitch Crawford
Public Service Towers, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.public domain
ORDER CLAY D. LAND, District Judge. Plaintiff Public Service Towers, Inc. alleges that Defendant Best Buy Stores, L.P. built a large retaining wall that encroaches on Public Service’s property. Public Service originally filed a trespass action in this Court on July 3, 2008 seeking $125,000 in damages. Compl. 5 ¶ 2, Public Service Towers, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., ECF No. 1 in M
Noyes v. Universal Underwriters Insurancepublic domain
ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, JR., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and for an Award of Costs Including Attorney’s Fees (Dkt. # 13) and Defendant’s Response in Opposition to the Motion (Dkt. # 15). Upon review and consideration, it is the Court’s conclusion that the Motion should be denied. Background
Hill v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North Americapublic domain
ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Doc. 14) filed July 15, 2014. Defendant Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America filed its Response in Opposition (Doc. 16) on July 31, 2014. Plaintiff argues (1) that Defendant’s Notice of Removal (Doc. 1) was premature because it was based on a Motion for Leave to Amend which had not yet bee
VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge The case comes before the Court on the Motion To Remand filed by the Plaintiff (the "Motion"). (Doc. 16). Oral argument was held on the motion on February 15, 2018. For the reasons stated herein and at oral argument, the Motion will be GRANTED and this case will be REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama.
Caudill v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
271 F.Supp.2d 1324 (2003) Ronald CAUDILL and Jewell Caudill, parents and next friends of Jacob Caudill, a minor Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. No. 03-CV-0427-EA (M). United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. July 8, 2003. *1325 James E Frasier, Steven R Hickman, Jerry Lynn Franks, Jr, Frasier Frasier & Hickm
Sasser v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
126 F.Supp.2d 1333 (2001) Dwight SASSER, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 00-T-638-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. January 12, 2001. *1334 Michael E. Jones, Luverne, AL, Jere L. Beasley, J. Greg Allen, Richard D. Morrison, Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles,
Hattaway v. Engelhard Corp.public domain
998 F.Supp. 1479 (1998) Walton E. HATTAWAY, Plaintiff, v. ENGELHARD CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation Defendant. No. 5:97-CV-546-3 (DF). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. March 17, 1998. Paul E. Schlam, Columbus, GA, for Walton E. Hattaway, plaintiff. Howard Jerome Strickland, Jr., Macon, GA, for Engelhard Corporation, a Delaware C
Berbig v. Sears Roebuck and Co., Inc.public domain
(2008) Zachery BERBIG, Plaintiff, v. SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY, INC. and Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 08-1187 (RHK/JSM). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. July 25, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiff in this personal-injury action,
Sledz v. Flintkote Co.public domain
209 F.Supp.2d 559 (2002) Charles Michael SLEDZ, Plaintiff v. The FLINTKOTE COMPANY, et al., Defendants No. CIV. AMD 02-2050. United States District Court, D. Maryland. July 11, 2002. *560 Brian C. Parker, parker Dumler and Kiely LLP, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff. Geoffrey S. Tobias, Ober Kaler Grimes and Shriver, Sidney G.
Hill v. Ascent Assurance, Inc.public domain
205 F.Supp.2d 606 (2002) Mary HILL, et al. Plaintiffs v. ASCENT ASSURANCE, INC., et al. Defendants No. 401CV319DB. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division. April 5, 2002. *607 Willie L. Bailey, Bailey & Griffin, Greenville, MS, Edward Blackmon, Jr., Blackmon & Blackmon, Canton, MS, Charles Vict
McDaniel v. Loyapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Remand to State Court, filed August 15, 2014 (Doc. 20)(“Motion to Remand”). The Court held a hearing on November 18, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant A’mando Gaytan Saucedo is a New Mexico citizen, thus destroying diversity and necessitating remand; (ii) wheth
Hernandez v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.public domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *931THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Airswift Holdings Limited's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Brief in Support, filed November 8, 2017 (Doc. 7)("Motion"); (ii) the Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Ruling Pending Jurisdictional Discovery o
Ariel Land Owners, Inc. v. Dringpublic domain
245 F.Supp.2d 589 (2003) ARIEL LAND OWNERS, INC, Plaintiff, v. Lori DRING and Nancy Asaro, Defendants. No. CIV.A.3:01-CV-0294. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. January 28, 2003. *590 Joseph A. O'Brien, Oliver Price & Rhodes, Clarks Summitt, PA, Michael P. Lehutsky, Honesdale, PA, for Plaintiff. Donald H
De La Rosa v. Reliable, Inc.public domain
*1140 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion to Remand, filed May 6, 2015 (Doc. 20)(“Mo-tion to Remand”); and (ii) Defendant Reliable, LLC’s Motion to Amend Notice of Removal to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexi
Aguayo v. AMCO Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand, filed May 28, 2014 (Doc. 12)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on August 7, 2014. The primary issue is whether the Court should grant the Motion and remand this case to state court, because it was pending there for “more than 1 year” at the time of removal