Cases

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. li>This is a domestic case involving the determination of fault and the denial of a motion for contempt; filed by Plaintiff. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, vacate in part, and render. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY The parties were married in March 1987. On November Í2, 2013, Plaintiff, Jac Barnett (“Jac”), filed a Petition for Divor

Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 732-788; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 15-CA-766 |! Denied.

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 178 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-14-703 Opinion Delivered March 11, 2015 SUNSHINE BROOKS BARNETT APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

In re Barnett Jr., William et al.; Barnett, Amelia; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 59-717; to the *889Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-C-1025. Denied.

238 P.3d 594 (2010) Alena BARNETT, Appellant, v. Timothy BARNETT, Appellee. No. S-13177. Supreme Court of Alaska. August 27, 2010. *596 Thomas R. Wickwire, Law Office of Thomas Wickwire, Fairbanks, for Appellant. Daniel L. Callahan, Callahan Law Office, Fairbanks, for Appellee. Before: CARPENETI, Chief Justice, FABE

DREW, J. | ¡Jimmie Barnett appeals a judgment ordering him to pay to his former wife one-half of an early withdrawal penalty that was incurred when his sister, to whom he *1046had granted power of attorney, removed former community property from an annuity. Concluding that the trial court erred in denying Jimmie’s exception of insufficiency of s

Decisions of The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Without Published Opinions Affirmed.

The court erred in ordering a radical change in custody via an interim order, without the benefit of a full evidentiary record (see Scotto v Scotto, 66 AD2d 839 [1978]). The propriety of the order has been undermined by the child’s improvement during the time the order was stayed by this Court pending this appeal. Proper resolution of the custody issue requires a prompt trial, at which a full evidentiary record is developed, so that the court is

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 835 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 836 ¶ 1. Deborah D. Barnett (Debbie) appeals the decision of the Chancery Court of Madison County regarding classification an

*830Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.), entered on or about May 12, 2005, which, in an action for divorce, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion to mutually restrain the parties from permitting their son to be in the presence of either’s paramour during his or her parenting time, pending a further order of the court, unanimously affirmed, without cost

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM. Larry Barnett (the husband) appeals from a final order that denies his claim against Susan Barnett (the wife) for retroactive child support. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. The parties’ long and contentious dissolution proceedings, both here and in Tennessee where the husband lives with the parties’ three children, began in 1995. See Barnett v. Barnett, 787 So.2d 946 (F

Justice ENOCH filed a concurring opinion. I do not join the Court’s discussion about federal common law in Part IV of its opinion because the parties neither brief *127nor argue the point. But I agree with the Court’s opinion, as far as it goes, in parts I, II, III, V, and with the Court’s judgment. I write separately because while I agree, as the

787 So.2d 946 (2001) Larry Roger BARNETT, Appellant, v. Susan M. BARNETT, Appellee. No. 2D00-2420. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 8, 2001. Andrew J. Rodnite, Jr. and Joseph R. Park of Park, Bugg, Rodnite, Ossian and Zdravko, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellant. H. Jo Butterworth, Clearwater, for Appellee. THREADGILL, Judge.

768 So.2d 441 (2000) Bonnie BARNETT, Petitioner, v. Harry BARNETT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Elliot Barnett, deceased, Respondent. No. SC96853. Supreme Court of Florida. August 31, 2000. Nancy Little Hoffman, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Petitioner. David A. Gart of Shutts & Bowen LLP, West Palm Beach, Florida; and Barbara J. Compiani o

27 S.W.3d 904 (2000) Robert McAlister BARNETT, III v. Paula Lynn BARNETT. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. September 5, 2000. *905 D. Mitchell Bryant, Cleveland, Tennessee, Russell Theodore King, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for appellant, Robert McAlister Barnett, III. Glenna M. Ramer and Sandra Jean Bott, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for

OPINION O’CONNOR, J. The appellant, Marleen Barnett (the Wife), is the widow of Christopher Barnett. The appellee, Dora Barnett (the Mother), is Christopher’s mother. The Wife appeals the partial summary judgment rendered in favor of the Mother and others and the denial of her applications for family allowance and allowance in lieu of exempt property. The Mother appeals a jury verdict in favor of the Wife. We a

718 So.2d 302 (1998) Susan M. BARNETT, Appellant, v. Larry Roger BARNETT, Appellee. No. 97-04678. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. September 11, 1998. *303 Joseph S. Alexander, Clearwater, for Appellant. Andrew J. Rodnite, Jr. of Park, Bugg, Rodnite, Ossian and Zdravko, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellee.<

743 So.2d 105 (1999) Bonnie BARNETT, Appellant, v. Harry BARNETT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Elliott Barnett, deceased, Appellee. No. 98-0798. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 17, 1999. Nancy Little Hoffman of Nancy Little Hoffman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Barbara J. Compiani of Caruso, Burlington,

727 So.2d 311 (1999) Susan M. BARNETT, Petitioner, v. Larry Roger BARNETT, Respondent. No. 98-04755. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 17, 1999. M. Katherine Ramers of M. Katherine Ramers, P.A., Dunedin, for Petitioner. Andrew J. Rodnite, Jr. of Park, Bugg, Rodnite, Ossian & Zdravko, Clearwater, for Respondent. PER CURI