Cases

654 F.Supp.2d 1066 (2009) Brigit BARNES, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for minor children R.X. and M.X., Jerry Barnes, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF PLACER, Emily Hill, individually and as an employee of the County of Placer, Deputy Harroun, individually and as an employee of the County of Placer, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 2:07-cv-01678-JAM-JFM. United States District Co

153 Cal.App.3d 209 (1984) 200 Cal. Rptr. 181 TERENCE A. SWIFT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF PLACER et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. 22472. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. March 19, 1984. *211 COUNSEL Richard J. Chiurazzi and David P. Mastagni for Plaintiff and A

Filed 5/1/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ---- COUNTY OF BUTTE, C071785 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No.

Filed 4/7/2023 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ---- COUNTY OF BUTTE, C071785 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No.

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiffs brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants the County of Sacramento, the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”), Child Protective Services (“CPS”), CPS employees, and Sacramento County counsel based on an investigation by CPS an

Opinion YEGAN, J. As Oliver Wendell Holmes said: “Men must turn square comers when they deal with the Government.” (Rock Island &c. R. R. v. United States (1920) 254 U.S. 141, 143 [65 L.Ed. 188, 41 S.Ct. 55].) Our own California Supreme Court remarked: “. . . ‘It is hard to see why the government should not be held to a like standard of

Filed 1/8/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX VENTURA FOOTHILL NEIGHBORS, 2d Civil No. B254120 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2008-00323043-CU-PT- Plaintiff and Respondent, OXN))

184 Cal.App.4th 1422 (2010) 109 Cal.Rptr.3d 647 STEVE HOWARD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant and Respondent. No. D055419. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. April 29, 2010. *1424 Thorsnes Bartolotta McGuire, Vincent Bartolotta, Jr., and Karen

433 F.Supp.2d 692 (2006) COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF HENRICO COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Plaintiff,. v. RT, a minor, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:04CV923. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. June 14, 2006. *693 *694 *695 Joseph Thomas

130 Cal.Rptr.2d 436 (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 278 WESTERN AGGREGATES, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF YUBA, Defendant and Respondent. No. C037523. Court of Appeal, Third District. July 17, 2002. Opinion on Denial of Rehearing August 16, 2002. Review Denied October 16, 2002.

Filed 3/6/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR TEMPLE OF 1001 BUDDHAS et al., Plaintiffs and A167719 Appellants, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. CITY OF FREMONT, 21CV002808) Defendant and Respondent. This appeal ar

LOHR, Justice. The appellants, Earl J. Brubaker, Rexford L. Mitchell and Valeo, Inc., are holders of unpatented mining claims located on federal land in Teller and El Paso Counties. The appellants sought to conduct limited test drilling on the site of these claims for the purpose of obtaining mineral samples that would be used to determine whether they had made a qualifying discovery of valuable mineral deposits under federa

Opinion MANUEL, J. In March 1971, the City of Torrance and the County of Los Angeles (County), acting for themselves and as trustees for the *206public, brought separate actions to establish a “public beach recreation easement” on certain property owned by Oscar and Shirley Berk, naming as defendants in addi

This is a controversy over a block of land, known and designated as block six of the town of Tahoe City, California, and which is alleged and found by the court to be public commons. It is alleged that the defendants are and have been for many years wrongfully and without right in possession of and occupying certain portions of said block, claiming the *Page 766 ownership thereof in fee. The prayer of the complaint is that said block of land be adj

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

On August 1, 2017 and October 12, 2017, Mr. Ramachandran filed claims with the city invoking the Government Tort Claims Act against Los Altos. Id. ¶ 57. Los Altos did not respond to those claims. On October

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] There must be something in a complaint to show the character of the claim made by the defendants, so that *Page 282 the court may determine from the face of the complaint whether the claim is a cloud on the title or whether it is merely a claim of no consequence. McLeod v. Lloyd, 71 P. 598. In a suit to remove a clou

Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 2021.12.06 Commission '00'07- 09:30:21 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMCA-066 Filing Date: Septe

Filed 12/20/17; Certified for Publication 1/8/18 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CLEWS LAND AND LIVESTOCK, LLC et D071145 al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2015-00032905- v.

McCONNELL, P. J. *171Plaintiffs Clews Land and Livestock, LLC; Barbara Clews; and Christian Clews (collectively, CLL) appeal a judgment in favor of defendant City of San Diego (City) on CLL's petition for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, violation of procedural due process, and equitable estoppel. CLL's peti