⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

19 opinions for “Barnes v. City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-09-21 · Published · cited 38× · 504 F.3d 803; 42 Communications Reg. (P&F) 901; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22541; 2007 WL 2743578
504 F.3d 803 (2007) James A. KAY, Jr., individually and d/b/a Lucky's Two Way Radio; Communications Relay Corporation, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a municipality; Rancho Palos Verdes Planning Commission, and its members; Frank Lyon; Larry Clark; Jon Cartwright; Thomas Opinion Long; Craig Mueller; Theodore Paulson; Donald Vannorsdall; City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Council, and its members; Jo
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972-03-31 · Published · cited 1× · 196 N.W.2d 209
196 N.W.2d 209 (1972) In the Matter of the LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTING OF the GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the State of Iowa as Enacted By the 64th General Assembly of the State of Iowa, House File 732. Louise NOUN et al., Applicants, Hugh D. Clark and James J. Wengert, Applicants, Clifton Larson, Applicant, v. Richard C. TURNER, Respondent. Nos. 55021-55023. Supreme Court of Iowa.
District Court, N.D. New York · 1918-08-01 · Published · cited 0× · 252 F. 815; 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 957
RAY, District Judge (after stating the facts as above). In or about the month of May, 1897, a voluntary unincorporated association of ladies, exclusively of the Catholic faith, was organized at New Haven, Conn., under the name “The Eadies’ Auxiliary of Russell Council, No. *81665, Knights of Columbus.” In fact, while a separate organization, it was auxiliary to the body k
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005-02-10 · Published · cited 35× · 691 N.W.2d 824; 2005 Minn. LEXIS 58; 2005 WL 310796
691 N.W.2d 824 (2005) Lena M. HYATT, Appellant, v. ANOKA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Respondents. No. A03-1707. Supreme Court of Minnesota. February 10, 2005. Randall J. Fuller, William J. Marshall, Babcock, Neilson, Mannella, Klint, Anoka, MN, for Appellant's. Jon K. Iverson, Paul D. Reuvers, Iverson Reuvers, LLC, Bloomington, MN, for Respondent's. Hea
Lilyerd v. Carlsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 478 N.W.2d 534; 1991 WL 271646
478 N.W.2d 534 (1991) J. Ralph LILYERD, et al., Appellants, v. E. Jerome CARLSON, Production Credit Association of St. Cloud, Respondents. E. Jerome CARLSON, Respondent, v. J. Ralph LILYERD, et al., Appellants. No. C2-91-657. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 24, 1991. Review Granted February 11, 1992.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998-07-14 · Published · cited 2× · 581 N.W.2d 391; 1998 Minn. App. LEXIS 809; 1998 WL 388090
581 N.W.2d 391 (1998) CANADIAN CONNECTION, Appellant, v. NEW PRAIRIE TOWNSHIP, Respondent. No. C6-97-2134. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. July 14, 1998. Review Denied September 30, 1998. *392 Sherry A. Enzler, Doherty, Rumble & Butler, P.A., St. Paul; and Warrenn C. Anderson, Amy J. Doll, Fluegel, Helseth, Mc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-09-21 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES A. KAY, JR., individually  and d/b/a LUCKY’S TWO WAY RADIO; COMMUNICATIONS RELAY CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a No. 05-56149 municipality; RANCHO PALOS VERDES PLANNING COMMISSION, and  D.C. No. CV-02-03922-DSF its members;
Stipe v. SHINSEKIpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010-02-18 · Published · cited 3× · 690 F. Supp. 2d 850; 2010 WL 618485
690 F.Supp.2d 850 (2010) Kathleen S. STIPE, Plaintiff, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant. Case No. 4:06CV1692SNLJ. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. February 18, 2010. *854 Kathleen S. Stipe, Madison, IL, pro se. Stephen S. Davis, Office of U.S. Attorney, St. Louis,
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986-05-13 · Published · cited 1× · 387 N.W.2d 200; 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4327
387 N.W.2d 200 (1986) ROCKVILLE TOWNSHIP, Respondent, v. David W. LANG, Appellant. No. CX-85-2034. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. May 13, 1986. *201 Stephen Lickteig, Timothy D. Clements, Cold Spring, for respondent. William P. Kain, St. Cloud, for appellant. Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and LESLIE and C
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 990 F. Supp. 704; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 694; 1998 WL 24310
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT KOZAK’S MOTION TO DISMISS BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.................................... 706 II. FINDINGS OF FACT..................................................... 707 III. LEGAL ANALYSIS....................................................... 708
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993-10-07 · Published · cited 41× · 6 F.3d 1297; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 25881; 1993 WL 392228
PER CURIAM. We reverse the conviction for conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 241 (1988), because of errors in the instructions that were given. We remand for retrial under instructions to be given in accordance with the concurring opinion of Judge John R. Gibson, in which Chief Judge Arnold and Judges Bowman, Wollman, and Hansen concur. Judges Lay, Loken, and Morris S. Arnold concur in the result and judgment of the court' for the reaso
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR PATRICK BLANKS, et al., ) No. ED97810 ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis vs. )
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-09-16 · Published · cited 76× · 450 S.W.3d 308; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1013; 2014 WL 4589815
LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge. “Our Tigger.” That is what Austin Manning’s parents called him when he was a little boy, because he bounced around like Tigger from the classic tale, Winnie the Pooh. He never sat still for more than a second. At the time, the family thought it was cute. Little did they know of the problems to come.
Noun v. Turnerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 196 N.W.2d 209; 1972 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 994
Supplemental Opinion. PER CURIAM: Our prior opinion in this case1 sets forth the nature, issues and background of the subject litigation, thus obviating the need for any extended discussion thereof in this supplement. We there concluded, Laws of the First Session, Sixty-Fourth General Assembly, Chapter 95 (H.F. 732), providing for reapportionment of both houses of the General
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934-03-13 · Published · cited 42× · 33 P.2d 207; 168 Okla. 376; 1934 OK 158; 1934 Okla. LEXIS 182
I am unable to concur in the majority opinion. The deed in question is designated a general warranty deed. In the granting clause appears, in part, the following: "That said party of the first part * * * does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said party of the second part, * * * all of the following real estate situated in the county of Kay and Territory of Oklahoma, towit: "A strip of land 50 feet in width off the north side of the northeast quarter (1/4) e
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904-06-10 · Published · cited 6× · 121 Wis. 127; 99 N.W. 909; 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 50
The following opinion was filed April 19, 1904: *207I. Motions to Dismiss Appeals. Maeshall, J. Many questions are presented for consideration on tlie motions to dismiss. Perhaps most of them •could well he jfassed without even a mention thereof. It is certain, as will he seen, that those upon which the motions must
In re Yawgerpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899-11-28 · Published · cited 0× · 61 N.Y.S. 1152
No opinion. Parts of the decree appealed from amrmed, with costs against the appellant personally. *1153INDEX ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL. ACCOUNT STATED. Right of action by or against personal representative, see “Executors and Administrators,” § 6. ABUTTING OWNERS. Assessments for expenses of public improvements, see “Municipal Corporations,” § 5. Compensation for taking of or injury