Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Barnes v. City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota”
Kay v. City of Rancho Palos Verdespublic domain
504 F.3d 803 (2007) James A. KAY, Jr., individually and d/b/a Lucky's Two Way Radio; Communications Relay Corporation, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a municipality; Rancho Palos Verdes Planning Commission, and its members; Frank Lyon; Larry Clark; Jon Cartwright; Thomas Opinion Long; Craig Mueller; Theodore Paulson; Donald Vannorsdall; City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Council, and its members; Jo
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
In Re Legislative Districting of General Assemblypublic domain
196 N.W.2d 209 (1972) In the Matter of the LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTING OF the GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the State of Iowa as Enacted By the 64th General Assembly of the State of Iowa, House File 732. Louise NOUN et al., Applicants, Hugh D. Clark and James J. Wengert, Applicants, Clifton Larson, Applicant, v. Richard C. TURNER, Respondent. Nos. 55021-55023. Supreme Court of Iowa.
RAY, District Judge (after stating the facts as above). In or about the month of May, 1897, a voluntary unincorporated association of ladies, exclusively of the Catholic faith, was organized at New Haven, Conn., under the name “The Eadies’ Auxiliary of Russell Council, No. *81665, Knights of Columbus.” In fact, while a separate organization, it was auxiliary to the body k
Hyatt v. Anoka Police Departmentpublic domain
691 N.W.2d 824 (2005) Lena M. HYATT, Appellant, v. ANOKA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Respondents. No. A03-1707. Supreme Court of Minnesota. February 10, 2005. Randall J. Fuller, William J. Marshall, Babcock, Neilson, Mannella, Klint, Anoka, MN, for Appellant's. Jon K. Iverson, Paul D. Reuvers, Iverson Reuvers, LLC, Bloomington, MN, for Respondent's. Hea
Lilyerd v. Carlsonpublic domain
478 N.W.2d 534 (1991) J. Ralph LILYERD, et al., Appellants, v. E. Jerome CARLSON, Production Credit Association of St. Cloud, Respondents. E. Jerome CARLSON, Respondent, v. J. Ralph LILYERD, et al., Appellants. No. C2-91-657. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 24, 1991. Review Granted February 11, 1992.
Canadian Connection v. New Prairie Townshippublic domain
581 N.W.2d 391 (1998) CANADIAN CONNECTION, Appellant, v. NEW PRAIRIE TOWNSHIP, Respondent. No. C6-97-2134. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. July 14, 1998. Review Denied September 30, 1998. *392 Sherry A. Enzler, Doherty, Rumble & Butler, P.A., St. Paul; and Warrenn C. Anderson, Amy J. Doll, Fluegel, Helseth, Mc
Kay v. Rancho Palos Verdespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES A. KAY, JR., individually and d/b/a LUCKY’S TWO WAY RADIO; COMMUNICATIONS RELAY CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a No. 05-56149 municipality; RANCHO PALOS VERDES PLANNING COMMISSION, and D.C. No. CV-02-03922-DSF its members;
Stipe v. SHINSEKIpublic domain
690 F.Supp.2d 850 (2010) Kathleen S. STIPE, Plaintiff, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant. Case No. 4:06CV1692SNLJ. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. February 18, 2010. *854 Kathleen S. Stipe, Madison, IL, pro se. Stephen S. Davis, Office of U.S. Attorney, St. Louis,
Rockville Township v. Langpublic domain
387 N.W.2d 200 (1986) ROCKVILLE TOWNSHIP, Respondent, v. David W. LANG, Appellant. No. CX-85-2034. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. May 13, 1986. *201 Stephen Lickteig, Timothy D. Clements, Cold Spring, for respondent. William P. Kain, St. Cloud, for appellant. Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and LESLIE and C
United States v. Luapublic domain
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT KOZAK’S MOTION TO DISMISS BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.................................... 706 II. FINDINGS OF FACT..................................................... 707 III. LEGAL ANALYSIS....................................................... 708
United States v. Bruce Roy Leepublic domain
PER CURIAM. We reverse the conviction for conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 241 (1988), because of errors in the instructions that were given. We remand for retrial under instructions to be given in accordance with the concurring opinion of Judge John R. Gibson, in which Chief Judge Arnold and Judges Bowman, Wollman, and Hansen concur. Judges Lay, Loken, and Morris S. Arnold concur in the result and judgment of the court' for the reaso
Patrick Blanks v. Fluor Corporationpublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR PATRICK BLANKS, et al., ) No. ED97810 ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis vs. )
Patrick Blanks v. Fluor Corporationpublic domain
LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge. “Our Tigger.” That is what Austin Manning’s parents called him when he was a little boy, because he bounced around like Tigger from the classic tale, Winnie the Pooh. He never sat still for more than a second. At the time, the family thought it was cute. Little did they know of the problems to come.
Noun v. Turnerpublic domain
Supplemental Opinion. PER CURIAM: Our prior opinion in this case1 sets forth the nature, issues and background of the subject litigation, thus obviating the need for any extended discussion thereof in this supplement. We there concluded, Laws of the First Session, Sixty-Fourth General Assembly, Chapter 95 (H.F. 732), providing for reapportionment of both houses of the General
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
Marland v. Gillespiepublic domain
I am unable to concur in the majority opinion. The deed in question is designated a general warranty deed. In the granting clause appears, in part, the following: "That said party of the first part * * * does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said party of the second part, * * * all of the following real estate situated in the county of Kay and Territory of Oklahoma, towit: "A strip of land 50 feet in width off the north side of the northeast quarter (1/4) e
Harrigan v. Gilchristpublic domain
The following opinion was filed April 19, 1904: *207I. Motions to Dismiss Appeals. Maeshall, J. Many questions are presented for consideration on tlie motions to dismiss. Perhaps most of them •could well he jfassed without even a mention thereof. It is certain, as will he seen, that those upon which the motions must
In re Yawgerpublic domain
No opinion. Parts of the decree appealed from amrmed, with costs against the appellant personally. *1153INDEX ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL. ACCOUNT STATED. Right of action by or against personal representative, see “Executors and Administrators,” § 6. ABUTTING OWNERS. Assessments for expenses of public improvements, see “Municipal Corporations,” § 5. Compensation for taking of or injury