Cases

MEMORANDUM *** Kathleen Barnard appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s decision that she was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act and was ineligible for benefits. We affirm. We review de novo the district court’s order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of benefits. Lewis v. Apfel, 236 F.3d 503, 5

BARRETT, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff appeals the district court’s order affirming the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying plaintiffs applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We exercise jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 1

745 F.Supp. 1394 (1989) Lloyd G. PERRY, Plaintiff, v. Linda K. BARNARD, et al., Defendants. No. EV 88-24-C. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Evansville Division. September 26, 1989. Order October 12, 1990. *1395 *1396 Lloyd G. Perry, Newburgh, Ind., pro se. T

864 N.E.2d 1083 (2007) HARMONY HEALTH PLAN OF INDIANA, INC., individually and, alternatively, in the Name of the State of Indiana on relation of Harmony Health Plan of Indiana, Inc., Appellants-Petitioners-Plaintiffs, v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, Carrie Henderson, In her capacity as the Commissioner of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, and E. Mitchell Roob, Jr., in his capacity as the Secretary of the Indiana Fami

NORCOTT, J., with whom EVELEIGH, J., joins, concurring. Like the majority, Justice Eveleigh and I conclude that General Statutes § 1-217 (a),1 which prohibits *342public agencies from disclosing, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (act); General Statutes § 1-200 et seq.; the home addresses of various feder

OPINION Dawson, Judge: Respondent determined that petitioner does not qualify for exemption from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3).1 Petitioner challenges respondent’s determination and has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court for a declaratory judgment2 pursuant to section 7428. The issue for

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: The Commissioner of Finance and Control of the State of Connecticut appeals from an order of Chief Judge T. Emmet Clarie of the United States Court for the District of Connecticut, which confirmed an order of Bankruptcy Judge Saul Seidman and dismissed the Commissioner’s petition for review. The bankruptcy judge found that a debt owed by the bankrupt-app

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS O. RICE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are the Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and the Commissioner’s motion for remand for further administrative proceedings (ECF Nos. 17 and 21). Plaintiff is represented by Cory J. Brandt. Defendant is represented by Lisa Goldoftas. The Court has reviewed the administrative record and the parties’

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REVERSE OR REMAND THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER (Dkt. Nos. 8 & 11) PONSOR, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action seeks review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiffs applica

509 F.Supp.2d 779 (2007) Judy A. SILK, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE[1], Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 4:06-CV-183 RWP-TJS. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. August 31, 2007. Gary L Hayward, United States Attorney, Des Moines, for Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Timothy N Tripp, Tripp, P.C.,

ORDER DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge. This matter is before the court upon the objection by Ronald L. Bernard, as representative of Todd Michael Bernard,1 to the July 1, 2013, report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes. In his report, the magistrate judge recommends that the court deny the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff and grant the

501 F.Supp.2d 1267 (2007) Elias IATRIDIS, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CV 05-5264-RC. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 6, 2007. *1268 Denise Bourgeois Haley, Lawrence D. Rohlfing Law Offices, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Plaintiff. Assistant

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS SINGAL, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket # 7) Plaintiffs Complaint. As explained herein, the line of cases starting with Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315, 63 S.Ct. 1098, 87 L.Ed. 1424 (1943), requires that the Court ABSTAIN. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is therefore GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARD

518 F.Supp.2d 715 (2007) Rita A. VO, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. C.A. No. 9:06-1624-PMD-GCK. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division. September 5, 2007. *716 Paul Townsend McChesney, McChesney and McChesney, Spartanburg, SC, for Plaintiff. Beth Dra

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. After Congress passed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (“PRWORA”), narrowing the eligibility of non-citizens for Medicaid and other federal benefits, the state of Maine responded in 1997 by extending state-funded medical assistance benefits to certain legal aliens rendered ineligible for Medicaid. In 2011, the Maine L

ORDER ON THE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge. In 1997, the state of Maine elected to cover noncitizens under its state Medicaid program and it continued to do so until June 2011, when the Maine Legislature passed Public Law 2011, chapter 380, section KK-4, terminating Medicaid-ineligible alien health benefit coverage. Noncitizens Hans Bruns and Kadra Hassan, o

OPINION LILLEHAUG, Justice. For at least half a century, federal constitutional law has been clear: an administrative search warrant need‘not be supported by individualized suspicion of a code violation to justify an unconsented-to rental housing inspection. Camara v. Mun. Court, 387 U.S. 523, 538, 87 S.Ct. 1727, 18 L.Ed.2d 930 (1967). Such an administrative warrant satisfies the probable cause r

328 S.W.3d 277 (2010) Taylor POOLE, Claimant/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of Second Injury Fund, Respondent. No. ED 94052. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. October 5, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 13, 2010.<

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JULIA BERNSTEIN; ESTHER GARCIA; Nos. 19-15382 LISA MARIE SMITH, on behalf of 20-15186 themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:15-cv-02277- JST v. VIRGIN AMERICA, INC.; ALASKA ORDER AND AIRLINES, INC.,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JULIA BERNSTEIN; ESTHER GARCIA; Nos. 19-15382 LISA MARIE SMITH, on behalf of 20-15186 themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:15-cv-02277- JST v. VIRGIN AMERICA, INC.;