Cases

KLIEBERT, Judge. The defendants-appellants, Deborah Sutherlin, wife of/and Michael DiRosa, de-volutively appeal from a judgment rendered in a via ordinaire proceeding ordering them to pay to plaintiff-appellee, First National Bank of Commerce (FNBC) as Trustee, the total sum of $79,288.65 for principal, late charges, interest and attorney fees, being the amount due on a promissory note secured by a mortgage dated December 15

*406 OPINION OF THE COURT SMITH, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying the motion of Appellant NBT Bank, N.A. (“NBT”) for summary judgment, and granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee First National Community Bank (“FNCB”). At issue is

334 B.R. 780 (2005) In re Eugene ANTHONY and Arleen Anthony, et al. First Franklin Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Locke D. Barkley, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-13385. Adversary No. 02-1105. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi. December 8, 2005. *781 Michael Leo Hall, John R. Chiles, Burr & Forman, Birmingham, AL

157 F.Supp.2d 706 (2000) FIRST TENNESSEE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, Defendant. CIV.A.No. 3:99CV859LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. October 5, 2000. *707 Sheryl M. Bey, Tiffanee Nicole Wade, Baker, Donelson, Bearman & Caldwell, Jackson, MS, for Plainti

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: A bank maintains that an accounting firm negligently misrepresented the financial resources of a client of the firm in a 1980 audit report, upon which the bank relied to its detriment in extending a $2.1 million commercial loan. The client defaulted on the note immediately and remains insolvent, thus shifting the focus of this litigation from the d

OPINION This is an appeal from an action in District Court of Pecos County, Texas to declare the heirship of Myrtle Cato Mendel, deceased, on the maternal, or Highsmith, line of the family. This portion relating to the maternal line of the family was severed from that portion of the controversy relating to the paternal line, which case is also now pending on appeal. The trial court determined that the appellants are not heirs at law of the deceased. The transcr

208 F.Supp.2d 1352 (2002) SCADIF, S.A., a foreign corporation, Plaintiff, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association, Defendant. No. 98-2868-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. July 5, 2002. *1353 *1354 Alvin F. Lindsay III, Esq., Steel, Hector &a;

ORDER AND REASONS CLEMENT, District Judge. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment was decided this date on memoranda. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND This is a suit on a guaranty executed by defendant, Ludovic Suarez. While the guaranty was the result of a complicated financial transaction, the relevant facts ma

WOLF, Judge. The Stocktons appeal a final summary judgment of. foreclosure. The issue on direct appeal is if there are disputed issues of material fact concerning whether the underlying *395letter of credit was a standby or commercial letter of credit. We determine that the letter of credit and application were ambiguous, thereby creating disputed issues of material f

467 F.Supp.2d 519 (2006) Larry REGISTER and Esther Houlihan, Plaintiffs, v. CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY, Cambar Software, Inc., GreatBanc Trust Company, Hagemeyer North America, Inc., Mary Lou Fox, David L. Lea, Steven L. Raber, Thomas A. Skelton, Tom Stallings, James Warren, M. Joel Bateman, J. Randall Bishop, Cecil Duffie, Cheryl A. Blocker, Paula P. Greer, Debra J. Guest, David G. Gundling, Saundra-Gussman, Deborah B. Holden, Allison Mahoney

647 A.2d 1159 (1994) Claire M. ISAAC, Appellant, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND, D.C., Appellee. No. 92-CV-1551. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 18, 1994. Decided September 22, 1994. *1160 William V. DePaulo, Washington, DC, for appellant. James T. Heidelbach, Baltimore, MD, for

Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-30-2004 NBT Bank NA v. First Natl Comm Bank Precedent

318 F.Supp.2d 230 (2004) INTERBUSINESS BANK, N.A., Plaintiff v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIFFLINTOWN, Defendant, v. Allied Capital Corporation, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:03-CV-2272. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. April 21, 2004. *231 *232 Nedric

988 F.2d 1272 300 U.S.App.D.C. 314, 61 USLW 2597 FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, et al., Appellants,v.NATIONAL CREDIT UNIONADMINISTRATION, et al.FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, et al., LexingtonState Bank, Appellants,v.NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION. Nos. 91-5262, 91-5336. United States Court of Appeals,District of Col

344 F.3d 1123 SCADIF, S.A., a Foreign Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FIRST UNION NATIONAL, a National banking association, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee,Ameriplex Group, Inc., Third-Party-Defendant. No. 02-14372. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 2, 2003. Robin Lea, Ste

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALD. SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge: Appellants, four North Carolina banks and the American Bankers Association, challenged the National Credit Union Administration’s (NCUA) approval of several recent applications by AT & T Family Federal Credit Union (AT & T Family) to expand its membe

919 P.2d 759 (1996) ALASKA TRAVEL SPECIALISTS, INC., Appellant, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ANCHORAGE, Appellee. No. S-6246. Supreme Court of Alaska. July 19, 1996. *761 John F. McGee, Anchorage, for Appellant. John R. Beard, Anchorage, for Appellee. Before COMPTON, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, EASTAUGH, JJ., and SHORTEL

MAGILL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant SCADIF, S.A. (“SCADIF”) appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee First Union National Bank, n/k/a Wacho-via Bank (“First Union”). SCADIF alleges that First Union is strictly liable to SCADIF for approximately $3.2 million because First Union failed to pay or return a check for this amount before the “midnight

31 B.R. 924 (1983) In the Matter of Paul BARKLEY d/b/a The Fish Monger II, Debtor. BANK OF LANSING, Plaintiff, v. Paul BARKLEY, d/b/a The Fish Monger, and Edward B. Spence, Trustee, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. HL 82 0094, Adv. No. 82 835. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan. July 27, 1983. William Jennings, Lansing, Mich., for plaintiff. Edward S

OPINION SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge. These are three consolidated appeals from judgments of the district court allowing the bankruptcy trustee to avoid mortgages held by the defendants, First Union Home Equity Bank and ContiMortgage Corporation, under 11 U.S.C. § 544. In In re Rice, No. 02-4468, the district court exercised it