Cases

Per Curiam: We are asked to determine if the personal representative of a decedent’s estate may maintain a malpractice cause of action against the decedent’s attorney for substandard estate planning that resulted in increased tax liability. We answer this question “no” because the cause of action arose after the decedent’s death which means it does not qualify as a survival claim under K.S.A. 60-1801.

191 P.3d 325 (2008) Janet J. JEANES, as Administrator C.T.A of the Estate of Maxine J. Anton, Deceased, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Bank of America Corporation; Rudy Wrenick; and Sharon Kunard, Appellees. No. 97,855. Court of Appeals of Kansas. August 29, 2008. *328 John R. Hamilton, of Hamilton, Laughlin, Barker, Johnso

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ' TIMOTHY J.'CORRIGAN, District Judge. What do you do when your bank repeatedly tries ;to collect a debt that is not düe, you repeatedly try to tell them that they are making a mistake'but they just won’t listen, and then they file a foreclosure action on your home? Ronald and Deborah Goodin sued, alleging that Bank of America violated the federal Fair D

754 F.Supp.2d 500 (2010) Deborah HIRSCHBERG, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. No. 08 CV 1611(DRH)(AKT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 1, 2010. *501 Gabor & Gabor, by David George Gabor, Esq., Hope Senzer Gabor, Esq., Garden City, NY, for Plaintiff. Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodg

Bank of Am., N.A. v Ali (2022 NY Slip Op 00838) Bank of Am., N.A. v Ali 2022 NY Slip Op 00838 Decided on February 9, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Paul Butt, Jr., contends that Defendant Bank of America, N.A., has breached its fiduciary duty to him as trustee of a trust created in 1948 to administer a New Mexico oil and gas lease. The district court dismissed Mr. Butt’s complaint, finding that the Bank never assumed trusteeship and therefore had no fiduciary duty. We find that the trust

Opinion issued May 3, 2007 In The Court of Appeals For The

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. Bank of America, the issuer of a credit card, appeals from the denial of its application for arbitration of a dispute with a cardholder. We affirm. The basis of the trial court’s ruling on the issue was the determination that the cardholder, Ms. Evans, had never received the “Agreement” which purportedly contained the arbitration clause. Because Ms. Evans’ unequivocal denial of

HUNTER, JR., ROBERT N., Judge. *864 Ricky Williams ("Williams") appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of TD Bank. Williams argues genuine issues of material fact existed relating to the proceeds from a foreclosure sale.

[Cite as U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Bryant, 2013-Ohio-3993.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY U.S. BANK, N.A., : CASE NO. CA2012-12-266 Plaintiff-Appellee, :

304 B.R. 844 (2004) In re OUTBOARD MARINE CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Bank of America, N.A., successor in interest to Bank of America, N.A., formerly Nationsbank, N.A., in its capacity as Prepetition Agent Dip Agent, Plaintiff, v. Outboard Marine Corporation, et al., Defendants. Federal-Mogul Corporation, Counter-Plaintiff, v. Bank of America, N.A., successor in interest to Bank of America, N.A., formerly Nationsbank, N.A., in i

GARY W. LYNCH, Judge. James H. Wild, Trustee of the Gene Wild Revocable Trust; The School of the Ozarks, Inc., d/b/a College of the Ozarks; and Cottey College (collectively “Appellants”), appeal the trial court’s judgment on the pleadings in favor of Katherine Cunningham and Laura Cunningham (collectively “the Cunninghams”), in a case brought by U.S. Bank, Trustee of the Gene Wild Insurance Trust, seeking a determination as t

Order on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Dkt.50) and Defendants’ Motion to Quash Subpoena to a Nonparty (Dkt.23) DEBRA McVICKER LYNCH, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Beverly Barker’s motion to compel responses to interrogatories and requests for production directed to Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”) (Dkt.50). Defendants LINA an

MEMORANDUM OPINION LENA MANSORI JAMES, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing on March 20, 2014, after due and proper notice, upon the Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion to Dismiss”) filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) to dismiss this adversary proceeding pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) f

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT/ ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLEE: CROSS-APPELLANT CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY f/k/a GEORGE M. PLEWS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FREDERICK D. EMHARDT NORTH AMERICA: KATHERINE E. WINDERS JOSH S. TATUM DALE W. EIKENBERRY SEAN M. HIRSCHTEN Wooden & McLaughlin LLP

460 B.R. 306 (2011) In re Louis J. PEARLMAN, et al., Debtor. Soneet R. Kapila, as Chapter 11 Trustee for Trans Continental Airlines, Inc., Trans Continental Records, Inc., and Louis J. Pearlman Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff, v. TD Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Carolina First Bank d/b/a Mercantile Bank, as successor by merger to Citrus Bank, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 6:07-bk-761-KSJ. Adversary No. 6:09-ap-53.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-3252 ROBERT W. BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellee, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. EDWARD BOETTCHER and BEVERLY BOETTCHER,

Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court. As we have interpreted it, § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 imposes private civil liability on those who commit a manipulative or deceptive act in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. In this case, we *167must answer a question reserved in two earlier decisions: whether pr

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS William H., Orrick, United States District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs allege that the panoramic sunroofs installed in the Nissan vehicles they purchased spontaneously explode and that Nissan refuses to repair, replace, or otherwise compensate plaintiffs with respect to these explosions. They assert a host of claims on