Cases

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. The International Union of Elevator Constructors ("IUEC") appeals the order of the district court vacating an arbitration award originally in favor of the IUEC. Because the arbitration award drew its essence from the contract, we reverse. I. Background The IUEC is a union of workers who install, re

OPINION KUGLER, District Judge: This labor dispute comes before the Court on the motion of International Union of Elevator Constructors, AFL-CIO, and Local No. 5, International Union of Elevator Constructors (“Plaintiffs”) for summary judgment in this action to enforce their collective bargaining agreement with Regional Elevator Company1 (“Defendant” or “Regional”). For the reaso

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on interlocutory cross-appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), 1 as a result of the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction under the aegis of Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770, 398 U.S. 235, 90 S.Ct. 1583, 26 L.Ed.2d 199

SACK, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, Yasharay Mack, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Loretta A. Preska, Judge), which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. We conclude that the district court correctly granted the defendants’ motion with respect to Ma

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BUCKLO, District Judge. This is an action brought under Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185 (2006) by plaintiff Architectural and Ornamental Iron Workers Local Union No. 63 (“Local 63”) against defendants International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local Union 2 (“Local 2”) and Kone, Inc. (“Kone”), to enforce an arbitration award i

475 F.Supp.2d 757 (2006) ARCHITECTURAL & ORNAMENTAL IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 63, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS, LOCAL UNION 2, and Kone, Inc., Defendants. No. 06 C 862. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 2, 2006. *758 *759

OPINION FRYE, District Judge: The matter before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (# 22). UNDISPUTED FACTS Plaintiffs are the International Union of Elevator Constructors (IUEC) and Local No. 23, International Union of Elevator Constructors (Local 23). The IUEC represents persons employed in the business of installing, modernizing and servici

776 F.2d 374 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3187, 103 Lab.Cas. P 11,653 NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY, INC. and Otis Elevator Company,Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS, AFL-CIO,International Union of Elevator Constructors,Local 4 and Edward C. Sullivan,Defendants, Appellants. No. 85-1199. United States Court of Appeals,Fi

647 F.Supp. 976 (1986) NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS. Civ. A. No. H-85-5315. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. April 17, 1986. *977 Charles O. Strahley, Putney, Twombly, Hall & Hirson, New York City, Raymond Kalmans, Neel, Hooper & Kalmans, Houst

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge: National Elevator Industry, Inc. and three elevator companies appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Broderick, J.) compelling them to arbitrate discharge grievances with the International Union of Elevator Constructors, AFL-CIO. For reasons hereafter discussed, we affirm. National is a New York membership corporation wh

772 F.2d 10 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2474, 103 Lab.Cas. P 11,645 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS, AFL-CIO,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY, INC., Montgomery ElevatorCompany, Elevators, Inc., and Fairhall Elevator,Inc., Defendants-Appellants. Cal. No. 1314, Docket 85-7228. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit.

COFFIN, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises several challenges to the issuance of a preliminary injunction against a union’s interfering with an employer’s “knocking down” temporary me*376chanics to their permanent status as helpers and engaging in any work stoppage or refusal to work overtime. Plaintiffs-appellees are National Elevator Industry, Inc.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-1036 KEVIN D. WICKSTROM, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C

534 F.Supp. 265 (1982) ELEVATOR MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK, INC., and Otis Elevator Company, Plaintiffs, v. LOCAL 1, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS (an unincorporated association), Karl Stork, Thomas Connelly, and all others conspiring, acting in concert or otherwise participating with them or acting in their aid or behalf, Defendants. No. 82 Civ. 0149 (KTD). United States Dis

438 F.Supp. 1121 (1977) John R. DE MALHERBE, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS, International Union of Elevator Constructors Local No. 8, National Elevator Industry, Inc., Defendants. No. C-76-1668-CBR. United States District Court, N. D. California. September 28, 1977. *1122

765 F.Supp.2d 486 (2011) Suzanne C. LANGFORD, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 30, et al., Defendants. No. 10 Civ. 1644(RJH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 16, 2011. *489 Peter W. Overs, Jr., Jeffrey Michael Norton, Randolph M. McLaughlin, Harwood Feffer LLP, New York, NY, fo

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge: The Elevator Manufacturers Association of New York (EMANY) and Otis Elevator Company (Otis) appeal from an order of the Southern District of New York, 534 F.Supp. 265, Kevin T. Duffy, Judge, denying their motion for a preliminary injunction restraining Local 1, International Union of Elevator Constructors (Local 1) and two of its officers (Karl Stork, President, and Thomas Connelly, Business

MIKVA, Circuit Judge: This case involves a troublesome conjunction of a union constitutional requirement and a clause in the collective bargaining agreement between the union and employer. The union constitution requires members to pay fines before dues; the collective bargaining agreement contains a union security clause requiring t

426 F.Supp. 343 (1977) NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRIES, INC. (NEII), on behalf of itself and its member Westinghouse Electric Corp., Elevator Division, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL NO. 5, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS, Third-Party Defendant (two cases). Civ. A. Nos. 75-3299, 76-490. United States District C

OPINION OF THE COURT GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. In this action, brought on March 15, 1972 by the Attorney General on behalf of the United States1 for relief from alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the defendant International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local Union No. 5 (Local 5) appeals from a final order of the distr