⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

1 opinion for “Barbara Kinkead v. Techno-Chem”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000-11-29 · Published · cited 196× · 234 F.3d 558; 56 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1865; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29979; 2000 WL 1753646
MICHEL, Circuit Judge, coneurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part, with whom Circuit Judge RADER joins. I join the majority opinion with respect to the disposition of Questions 1, 2, 4, and 5. However, I must dissent from the majority’s response to Question 3 because I believe it contradicts Supreme Court precedent and policy. In Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v.