Cases

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered August 22, 2006, which granted the motion by defendants Kurzman Eisenberg Corbin Lever & Goodman and Andrew W. Goodman for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing the eighth cause of action (breach of fiduciary duty) but denied dismissal of the ninth cause of action (legal malpractice), unanimously modified, on the law, the motion granted dismissing the ninth cause of action, and ot

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2015 MSPB 41 Docket No. DA-0752-09-0604-P-1 Barbara R. King, Appellant, v. Department of the Air Force, Agency.

KAUGER, J.: ¶ 1 We granted certiorari to consider a single first impression issue: whether a prevailing parent, demonstrating good cause for withholding court-ordered visitation, is entitled to appeal-related attorney fees pursuant to 43 O.S. Supp.2003 § 112(D)(2).1 We determine that the statute supports an award *572of appeal-related atto

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Barbara Fakhouri sought damages from a Tennessee ski resort after she suffered injuries while using a tramway on the resort’s property in August 2012. Because a Tennessee statute immunizes the ski resort from liability for this claim, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the resort.

Tom Glaze, Justice, concurring. The majority opinion ce, correctly followed this court’s precedent in affirming the trial court’s dismissal of Mr. Arnell Willis’s election-contest complaint. The majority opinion reviews election-contest cases that emphasize that the Election Code was designed to resolve election disputes expeditiously. For these reasons, I am compelled to join the majority’s decision.

DONOVAN, J. {¶ 1} This matter is before the Court on the October 19, 2017 Notice of Appeal of *725 Robert King. King appeals from his October 4, 2017 Judgment of Conviction in the Dayton Municipal Court, following a bench trial, for failure to maintain exterior premises, in violation of

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01133-SCT RAY VIRGIL, BARBARA LLOYD AND CASSANDRA JOHNSON v. SOUTHWEST MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/31/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GEORGE WARD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: WALKER (BILL) JONES, III MICHAEL D. SIMMONS JUSTIN RONALD GLENN HENRY T. HOLI

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Any remedy appellant may have with regard to his claim that he did not receive the March 11, 2013, Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, lies with the lower tribunal. BENTON, C. J., THOMAS and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of October 2016 by Defendants (Northeastern Ob/Gyn, Ltd., Barbara Ann Carter, M.D., and Angela McWalter, CNM) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

WESTBROOKS, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Patrick King pled guilty in the Circuit Court of Copiah County to six counts of counterfeiting records. King later filed his first petition for postconviction relief (PCR) in the circuit court, and it was denied. King appealed the circuit court's denial of his first petition, and this Court dismissed that appeal. King v. State , 20

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Marsha J. Pechman, United States District Judge The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed: 1. Defendant King County’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 46), Plaintiffs’ Response (Dkt. No. 54), and Defendant’s Reply (Dkt. No. 56); 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00693-SCT SHANI M. BROWN v. DR. BARBARA DAVEY-SULLIVAN AND THE WOMAN’S CLINIC OF MISSISSIPPI, PLLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/15/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ELEANOR JOHNSON PETERSON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JACQUELINE KAYE HAMMACK D. COLLIER GRAHAM, JR.

235 P.3d 240 (2010) STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Adam Scott KING, Appellee. No. CR-09-0333-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. July 7, 2010. *241 Barbara Lawall, Pima County Attorney by Jacob R. Lines, Deputy County Attorney, Tucson, Attorneys for State of Arizona. Barton & Storts, P.C. by Brick P. Storts, III, W

*710MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. Debtor-Appellants John E. Allen and Barbara M. Cordi-Allen (“appellants”) appeal from the sua sponte appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts. They argue that the Bankruptcy Judge erred by appointing a Chapter 11 Trustee without (1) a

650 S.E.2d 523 (2007) Bradford L. KING, M.D., et al. v. Tamatha COOLEY. Record No. 062502. Supreme Court of Virginia. September 14, 2007. *524 John R. Braley, IV (Glen A. Huff; Tara M. McCarthy; Joyce A.N. Massey; Randolph H. Perry; Huff, Poole & Mahoney; McCarthy Massey & Mitchell, on briefs), Virginia Beach, for appella

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of October 2016 by Defendants (Albemarle Hospital Authority d/b/a Albemarle Health/Albemarle Hospital and Sentara Albemarle Regional Medical Center, LLC d/b/a Sentara Albemarle Medical) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

PER CURIAM. Norwest Mortgage Inc. (Petitioner) seeks review of a non-final order of the Broward County circuit court which required it to issue a satisfaction of mortgage before receiving full payment of the total amount due. We grant the petition and quash the order on review. *1140Petitioner filed its complaint to foreclose the mortgage in que

178 Cal.App.4th 1488 (2009) TAMMY KING, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BARBARA JOHNSTON, Defendant and Respondent. No. D054136. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. November 9, 2009. *1491 Glenn, Wright, Jacobs & Schell and Ralph E. Hughes for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Offices of William F. Ro