Cases

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Elaine Robinson is one of 64 women from 29 states who sued Pfizer in a Missouri state court, asserting state-law claims that arose from Pfizer’s manufacture and sale of the drug Lipitor, which they allege causes diabetes. Pfizer removed the ease to federal district court, 1 maintaining that the ca

03/10/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 2, 2016 IN RE CONSERVATORSHIP OF SOPHIA ELAINE TAYLOR Appeal from the Probate Court for Davidson County No. 14P1510 Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr., Judge No. M2016-01288-COA-R3-CV Th

493 F.3d 454 (2007) Barbara TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROGRESS ENERGY, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.*455 National Employment Lawyers Association; North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, Amici Supporting Appellant, Equal Employment Advisory Council; Society for Human Resource Management; Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America; Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor, Amici Supporting App

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. GARLAND, Circuit Judge: Milton Taylor contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not file a notice of appeal from the sentence Taylor received after pleading guilty to a federal offense. We conclude that Taylor’s counsel was not constitutionally ineffec

Post-award bid protest; BesL-Value Procurement; FAR Part 15; Deficiency; FAR 15.001. OPINION AND ORDER KAPLAN, Judge. In this post-award bid protest, Plaintiff Electronic On-Ramp, Inc. (“EOR”) challenges the Air Force’s award of a contract for linguist and analyst support services to defendant-intervenor Premier Mana

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00693-SCT SHANI M. BROWN v. DR. BARBARA DAVEY-SULLIVAN AND THE WOMAN’S CLINIC OF MISSISSIPPI, PLLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/15/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ELEANOR JOHNSON PETERSON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JACQUELINE KAYE HAMMACK D. COLLIER GRAHAM, JR.

ACCEPTED 05-17-01096-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 3/26/2018 6:39 PM

ON REHEARING PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT BARBARA TAYLOR,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROGRESS ENERGY, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; NORTH CAROLINA ACADEMY OF TRIAL LAWYERS,  No. 04-1525 Amici Supporting Appellant, EQUAL EMP

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge *13This matter comes before the Court on the motion [Dkt. No. 317] of dismissed plaintiffs for reconsideration of the Court's orders of dismissal. For the following reasons, the Court will grant the dismissed plaintiffs' motion and reinstate their claims.1

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge The above-captioned case involves claims brought by former flight service specialists against the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Transportation alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.

304 F.3d 30 RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, State of Rhode Island, Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of Labor; Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor; Occupational Safety and Health Administration;Charles N. Jeffress, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health; Ruth E. McCully, Regional Administrator Region 1, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Defen

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00378-CV DAVID J. KANTNER AND WIFE, APPELLANTS SHERI K. KANTNER, JON D. MATHE, DAVID MOORE, AND WIFE, SYLVIA MOORE, AND MICHAEL MORRIS AND WIFE, KIM MORRIS V. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY APPELLEES CORPORATION AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC

02-11-378--390-CV_COR

12 F.Supp.2d 556 (1998) Armand and Barbara CYR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF TEXAS, et al., Defendants. No. 4:98-CV-430-A. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. July 16, 1998. *557 George Parker Young, Friedman Young & Suder, Fort Worth, TX, Elizabeth H. Kilbride, Law Office

309 B.R. 728 (2004) In re PETRO-MARK, UTAH, LLC, Debtor. Bank One, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Gascard Inc., Fleetcor Technologies Inc., Petro-Mark Utah, LLC, and Macro Oil Company, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 03-49347-DML-11. Adversary No. 03-4425-DML. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. March 17, 2004. *7

BY JUDGE JAMES H. CHAMBLIN As set forth in detail under Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed for the following reasons: (1) Even if the information given to Investigator Jay Merchant by Karen Spalding on the morning after the murder is considered after-discovered evidence, no relief is available under Fitzgerald v. Bas

ON PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL SCHALL, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States petitions for permission to appeal orders certified by the United States Court of Federal Claims as ones involving controlling issues of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and for which an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of t

AMENDED ORDER APPROVING AMENDMENT AND DISTRIBUTION Timothy S. Black, United States District Judge Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Final Approval of Proposed Amendment to the Settlement and the Proposed Distribution (Doc. #3136) (“Joint Motion”).1 In considering the Joint Motion, the Court also has taken into consideration the presentations at the hear

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the tax court’s decision affirming the Commissioner’s deficiency determination against the taxpayers, David H. Orth and Barbara A. Orth. The taxpayers donated 73 lithographs to various charitable organizations, and claimed a charitable contribution deduction in the amount of $300 per lithograph, the price for which simi

ORDER OF COURT The court’s opinion, dated April 8, 2002, is hereby withdrawn, and the judgment dated April 8, 2002, is vacated. See the opinion and judgment dated August 30, 2002. The panel having withdrawn the opinion dated April 8, 2002, the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, filed by the appellants Migliore, Raddatz and Taylor, is denied as moot. Appellees’ motion to str