⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Barbara Clarkson”

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002-05-02 · Published · cited 7× · 198 F. Supp. 2d 997; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8350; 2002 WL 949283
198 F.Supp.2d 997 (2002) Raissa CLARKSON, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF FLORENCE, Defendant. No. 01-C-0587. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. May 2, 2002. *998 *999 *1000 Jeff Scott Olson, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff. Barbara J. Janaszek, Milwauke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973-10-26 · Published · cited 1× · 42 A.D.2d 1028; 348 N.Y.S.2d 263; 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3283
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In affirming we observe (1) The informal agreement with respect to property and support for the two children was meant to be and was merged into the order of February 23, 1971 and the judgment of divorce of March 25, 1971. Hence, the court retains full power to reconsider plaintiff’s right to and need of alimony from time to time (McMains v. McMains, 15 N Y 2d 283, 285-287). The record
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989-02-09 · Published · cited 22× · 376 S.E.2d 236; 324 N.C. 108; 1989 N.C. LEXIS 13
376 S.E.2d 236 (1989) 324 N.C. 108 Barbara Kramer VAUGHN, William Gary Vaughn, and Autumne Vaughn and Alana Vaughn, by Ronald Eric Vaughn, their guardian ad litem, Plaintiffs, v. George E. CLARKSON, R.T.C. Transportation, Inc., and Pavement Technology Systems, Ltd., Defendants. No. 248PA88. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 9, 1989. T
New York County Courts · 1987-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 141 Misc. 2d 83; 532 N.Y.S.2d 615; 1987 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2836
OPINION OF THE COURT Andrew G. Celli, J. This is a consolidated appeal of six separate but related summary proceedings commenced by the landlord respondent in the Clarkson Town Court against six tenants appellants. *84Four of the summary proceedings were originally consolidated and tried together. Two additional summary proceedings were consolidated and
District Court, S.D. New York · 1982-06-04 · Published · cited 1× · 540 F. Supp. 636; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12940
540 F.Supp. 636 (1982) The CLARKSON COMPANY LIMITED, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, appointed by the Supreme Court of the Province of Newfoundland, of the Property of Newfoundland Refining Company Limited and Provincial Refining Company Limited, Plaintiff, v. John M. SHAHEEN, Roy M. Furmark, Albin W. Smith, Peter L. Caras, Paul W. Rishell, Shaheen Natural Resources Company, Inc., Newfoundland Refining Company Ltd., U. S. A., and Founders Corporation,
District Court, S.D. New York · 1982-01-28 · Published · cited 41× · 533 F. Supp. 905; 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 317; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9266
533 F.Supp. 905 (1982) The CLARKSON COMPANY LIMITED, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, appointed by the Supreme Court of the Province of Newfoundland, of the Property of Newfoundland Refining Company Limited and Provincial Refining Company Limited, Plaintiff, v. John M. SHAHEEN, Roy M. Furmark, Albin W. Smith, Peter L. Caras, Paul W. Rishell, Shaheen Natural Resources Company, Inc., Newfoundland Refining Company Ltd., U. S. A., and Founders Corporation,
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1958-07-14 · Published · cited 0× · 315 S.W.2d 727; 1958 Mo. LEXIS 666
DALTON, Judge. This cause comes to the writer on reassignment. It is an action for the wrongful death of plaintiffs’ father. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiffs for $15,000 and defendant has appealed. This is the second appearance of this cause in this court. The sufficiency of the petition upon which the cause was tried was determined on the prior appeal. Zuber v. Clarkson Construction Co., 363 Mo.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009-06-03 · Published · cited 0× · 975 A.2d 1208; 2009 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 450; 2009 WL 1531653
975 A.2d 1208 (2009) STINGRAY, L.P., Appellant v. CONCORD TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD and Concord Township and Chris A. Panarello, D.D.S. & Elaine L. Panarello, et al. Stingray, L.P. v. Concord Township Zoning Hearing Board, Corcord Township, Chris A. Panarello, D.D.S. & Elaine L. Panarello; Daniel R. Mochocki & Louise E. Mochocki; William Theodore Pleibel III & Barbara Ann Rossi Pleibel Appeal of: Chris A. Panar
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952-07-14 · Published · cited 94× · 251 S.W.2d 52; 363 Mo. 352; 1952 Mo. LEXIS 659
251 S.W.2d 52 (1952) ZUBER et al. v. CLARKSON CONST. CO. No. 42842. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. July 14, 1952. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Denied September 8, 1952. *53 Arthur B. Taylor, Independence, Walter A. Raymond, Kansas City, for appellants. Tom J. Stubbs, Jack G. Beamer, S
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2011-05-19 · Published · cited 47× · 338 S.W.3d 114; 2011 WL 1761217
338 S.W.3d 114 (2011) Paul SMITH, John Allen, Marie Michelle Christie, Anne Leslie Clarkson, Margaret Fuchs, Robert Fuchs, Gwendolyn Griffin, Jeffrey Hagen, Frank Bennett Harvie, Jr., Dorcas Kay Horton, Robert Horton, Jo Renee Landers, Carey Livingston, Patricia Logan, Robert Logan, Marie A. Mixon, William J. Mixon, Jr., Timothy Gamble, Victoria M. Gamble, George A. Najerian, and Harlen L. Sperry, Appellants, v. CITY OF LEAGUE CITY, Texas, Appell
Steele v. Dillardpublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997-06-09 · Published · cited 6× · 486 S.E.2d 278; 327 S.C. 340; 1997 S.C. App. LEXIS 73
327 S.C. 340 (1997) 486 S.E.2d 278 Arthur STEELE, Appellant, v. Barbara Sue DILLARD, Respondent. No. 2675. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard May 6, 1997. Decided June 9, 1997. *341 Dana C. Mitchell, III, and Charles D. Hoskins, both of Mitchell, Bouton, Duggan, Yokel & Childs,
Virginia Circuit Court · 1988-07-20 · Published · cited 0× · 13 Va. Cir. 216; 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 379
By JUDGE JOHN E. CLARKSON I have now had an opportunity to completely review the entire file, transcript, and depositions and have given the Commissioner’s Report great weight in considering all of the evidence and facts. In deciding the difficult question of custody, the welfare of the child is the primary, paramount, and controlling consideration. All other matters are secondary. As between parents, the
Harrington v. Lauerpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995-07-17 · Published · cited 4× · 893 F. Supp. 352; 1995 WL 431536
893 F.Supp. 352 (1995) Robert HARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. Cheryl LAUER, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 93-3166 (CSF). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. July 17, 1995. *353 Frost, Rhodes, Devito & Smith, P.C. by Jack N. Frost and Adam Kenny, Plainfield, NJ, for plaintiff. Rand, Algeier, Tosti & Woodruff, P.C.
Coyer v. Hemmerpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995-09-27 · Published · cited 9× · 901 F. Supp. 872; 1995 WL 561255
901 F.Supp. 872 (1995) William F. COYER, Sr., and America Direct, Inc. formerly Advanced Electronics, Inc. aka Advanced Electronics and Daniel V. Barus, Plaintiffs and Defendants on the Counterclaim, v. John W. HEMMER and Barbara B. Hemmer, Defendants, Counterclaimants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. INNOVATIVE DESIGN PRODUCTS, INC., America Direct (H.K.) Ltd., MedTech, Inc., Wilcore International, Inc. and Mrs. William F. Coyer, Sr., Thir
Harrington v. Lauerpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995-06-08 · Published · cited 7× · 888 F. Supp. 616; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8434; 1995 WL 362436
888 F.Supp. 616 (1995) Robert HARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. Cheryl LAUER, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 93-3166 (CSF). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 8, 1995. *617 Frost, Rhodes, DeVito & Smith, P.C. by Jack N. Frost, Plainfield, NJ, for plaintiff. *618 Rand, Algeier,
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992-06-02 · Published · cited 17× · 795 F. Supp. 693; 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1002; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8636; 1992 WL 124330
795 F.Supp. 693 (1992) FIRST VALLEY LEASING, INC., Plaintiff, v. Theodore GOUSHY, Defendant. Civ. No. 91-1202 (CSF). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 2, 1992. *694 Barbara Lanza Farley, P.C. by Barbara Lanza Farley, Haddonfield, N.J., for plaintiff. Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman & Stahl, P.C.
Reed v. Dillardpublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995-10-12 · Published · cited 1× · 669 A.2d 33; 1995 Del. LEXIS 385; 1995 WL 619361
PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court en Banc after remand to the Family Court for further proceedings as directed by the Court’s decision in In the Interest of Kelly Stevens, Del.Supr., 652 A.2d 18 (1995) (“Stevens I ”). The background and history of this litigation concerning efforts to terminate the parental rights of Thomas P. Dillard (“Dillard”) over his biological daughter, Kelly Stevens (“
Superior Court of Delaware · 1997-04-04 · Published · cited 1× · 705 A.2d 601; 1997 Del. Super. LEXIS 113
OPINION TERRY, Resident Judge. Background Bell Atlantic — Delaware, Inc., which I will refer to as “BA-Del” filed a proposed tariff with the Public Service Commission (“PSC”) for a new service known as Residential Intel-lilineQ BRI which is also called Residential Integrated Services Digital Network, abbreviated R-ISDN. Without going into the technical aspects of th
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-03-08 · Published · cited 0× · 137 A.D.3d 488; 27 N.Y.S.3d 18
*489Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered July 15, 2013, which, inter alia, granted the motion of defendants United Nations International School, Kenneth Wrye and Harry Muniz (collectively, UNIS), and the cross motion of defendant Alex DeRosa, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Summary j
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977-01-17 · Published · cited 150× · 543 F.2d 1002
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: Following a ten week jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, appellants Barbara Hinton, William Beckwith, James Carter, David Bates, Scarvey McCargo, Charles Cameron, John Darby, and Thelma Darby were convicted of conspiracy to violate the federal narcotics laws, 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 841(a)(1), 846, 960(a)(1) a