Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Barbara A. Ryba”
Piatek v. Oak Drive Enterprises, Inc.public domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), dated December 11, 2013, which granted the motion of the defendant St. Andrews Ukranian Orthodox Church for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court
Stefanik v. Hochulpublic domain
Stefanik v Hochul (2024 NY Slip Op 24034) [*1] Stefanik v Hochul 2024 NY Slip Op 24034 Decided on February 5, 2024 Supreme Court, Albany County Ryba, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pur
Stefanik v. Hochulpublic domain
Stefanik v Hochul (2024 NY Slip Op 24034) [*1] Stefanik v Hochul 2024 NY Slip Op 24034 Decided on February 5, 2024 Supreme Court, Albany County Ryba, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pur
Sprague v. American Bar Ass'npublic domain
276 F.Supp.2d 365 (2003) Richard A. SPRAGUE, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, ABA Journal, and Terry P. Carter, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-382. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 31, 2003. *366 Barbara R. Axelrod, James E. Beasley, The Beasley Firm, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. David E. Abernat
Matter of The People of The State of New York v The Lutheran Care Network, Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 08727) Matter of The People of The State of New York v The Lutheran Care Network, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 08727 Decided on December 20, 2018 Appellate Division, Thir
Matter of Joshua BB. v. Kayla BB.public domain
Matter of Joshua BB. v Kayla BB. - 2026 NY Slip Op 04246 skip to main content It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website. Law Reporting Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Jackson v. Charleston County School Districtpublic domain
447 S.E.2d 859 (1994) Sarah E. JACKSON, Ruth A. Adams, Harold E. Ancrum, Louise Bennett, Wallis S. Berry, Mary G. Blakely, Judith N. Blancett, Joyce Boyeston, John R. Brechko, Alphonso Brown, Earl D. Brown, Gloria O. Brown, Richard Brown, Louwanda J. Bryant, Francena J. Buncomb, Theodore J. Coker, Rosemary A. Corley, George V. Doren, Ida Drayton, Mark Drayton, Jr., Susan W. Edmonds, Sarah N. Edwards, Vanetta B. Etheridge, Barbara J.K. Felder, James Fickl
Kellogg v. Nicholspublic domain
23-8093-cv Kellogg v. Nichols United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term, 2024 (Argued: September 25, 2024 Decided: August 18, 2025 Amended: March 5, 2026) Docket No. 23-8093-cv _____________________________________ JEREMY KELLOGG, JONATHAN HARMON,
Beachland Ents., Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Rev.public domain
[Cite as Beachland Ents., Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Rev., 2013-Ohio-5585.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99770 BEACHLAND ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES/
Jones v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
TERESHKO, J, I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff appeals from four separate orders of the trial court sustaining defendants’ preliminary objections and dismissing plaintiff’s third amended complaint with *248prejudice. The orders sustaining the preliminary objections of Michael Smerconish, Sam Katz and Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. are dated Oc
Dougherty v. Boyertown Timespublic domain
377 Pa. Superior Ct. 462 (1988) 547 A.2d 778 Richard J. DOUGHERTY, D.C., Appellant, v. The BOYERTOWN TIMES, a/k/a The Times of the Boyertown Area and Berks-Mont Newspapers, Inc., Appellees. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 20, 1988. Filed September 14, 1988. *466 Audrey L. Jacobsen, Norristown,
Tech Plus, Inc. v. Anselpublic domain
Gants, J. The plaintiffs, Tech Plus, Inc. (“Tech Plus”) and Betsy Piper, have brought an eight-count complaint against the defendants, Michael Ansel and his father, Sumner Ansel, claiming intentional interference with Tech Plus’s business relationship with a client, defamation, breach of Michael Ansel’s duty of loyalty, intentional infliction of emotional distress, concert of action, and violations of G.L.c. 93A. The Ansels brou
Kellogg v. Nicholspublic domain
23-8093 Kellogg v. Nichols UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 30th day of June, two thousand twenty-six. Present: DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., RICHARD J. SULL