Cases

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ONE CYPRESS TERMINALS, ) LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0694-BWD ) BLUEWING MIDSTREAM, LLC, ) )

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Patricia W. Griffin CHANCERY COURTHOUSE MASTER IN CHANCERY 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Date Submitted

774 F.Supp. 176 (1991) Andrew I. CRAMER, Plaintiff, v. DEVON GROUP, INC., Defendant. No. 90 CIV. 7748 (PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 17, 1991. *177 Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, New York City (Andrew H. Bart and Charles B. McKenna, of counsel), for plaintiff. O'Sullivan Graev & Kar

523 F.3d 1116 (2008) DELAWARE VALLEY SURGICAL SUPPLY INC.; Niagara Falls Memorial Medical Center, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Bamberg County Memorial Hospital & Nursing Center, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON; Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems Inc.; Ethicon Inc.; Ethicon Endo Surgery Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 08-55105. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

[Cite as Tsepas v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 2017-Ohio-1272.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEORGE H. TSEPAS : JUDGES: : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellant : Hon. John W. Wise, J.

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. The above referenced putative class action under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3) alleges that Defendant The Chasewood Bank (“Chasewood”) failed to make its automated teller machine (“ATM”), located at 8500 Cypresswood Drive, Spring, Texas 77379, accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals by adding required voice gui

OPINION OF THE COURT (August 8, 2017) Swan, Associate Justice. Appellants, Sandra and Patrick Cornelius, seek reversal of the trial court’s judgment, which concludes that they breached the terms of an automobile loan they had with Appellee, the Bank of Nova Scotia. Appellants also implore us to reverse the amount of damages awarded to Appellee. Additionally, Appellants argue that the tr

Memorandum Opinion Andrews, U.S. District Judge: This is a case of an auditor that did his job too well, or not well enough. Since there are genuine disputes of material fact, that is for the jury to sort out. Plaintiff Charles Pratt worked for Defendant M & T bank for seventeen months until it fired him. During that time, Plaintiff worked in Defendant’s audit department on the info

607 F.Supp.2d 447 (2009) Mark KOTTLER, Karen S. Long and Robert E. Long, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DEUTSCHE BANK AG, et al., Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 7773 (PAC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 9, 2009. *453 Catherine A. Torell, Cohen, Milstein, Sellers

137 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 7 (1989) 585 A.2d 1123 DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. Richard L. THORNBURGH, Governor Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and Thomas Larson, Secretary of Transportation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Respondents. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRA

OPINION OF THE COURT ALDISERT, Circuit Judge. Three appeals from a judgment of the district court in a typewriter trade secret misappropriation case filed by the Remington Rand Corporation as an adversary action in bankruptcy against Business Systems, Inc., B.V., a Dutch corporation (hereinafter BSI B.V.), and BSI Office Equipment, Inc., an affiliated United States corporation (hereinafter BSI U.S.), r

830 F.2d 1260 4 U.S.P.Q.2d 1355 REMINGTON RAND CORPORATION-DELAWAREv.BUSINESS SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, Global Business Corporation,Frank Capadano & Art Barber, Remington Rand, B.V. & Xerox.Appeal of BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., B.V. and BSI Office Equipment, Inc. Nos. 86-5588, 86-5589 and 86-5590. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.

Argued May 20, 1929. Plaintiffs' action of ejectment against defendant, administrator d. b. n. c. t. a. of the estate of Sallie P. Gibbons, is to recover possession of 45.33 acres of land, alleging right of possession and title thereto under the provisions of a clause of the will of testatrix dated February 11, 1914, by which she devised to plaintiffs, appellants here, a described portion of her real estate, designated as "the lot or tract of land of about 35 acres at the northeast corner of

Opinion issued December 12, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00376-CV ——————————— 7677 GROUP, L.P., Appellant V. SMS FINANCIAL JDC, L.P., AS ASSIGNEE OF FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORA

325 U.S. 1 (1945) CRAMER v. UNITED STATES. No. 13. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 9, 1944. Reargued November 6, 1944. Decided April 23, 1945. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *2 Mr. Harold R. Medina, with whom Mr. John McKim Minton, Jr.

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal challenges the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of the appellant’s third amended and consolidated complaint.1 In essence, this is a shareholder derivative and class action suit asserting that the directors and officers of First Chicago Corporation (“FCC”) and First National Bank of Chicago (“FNBC”) have egregiously mismanaged the affairs of t

870 F.2d 1168 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,354Joel STARRELS, in a derivative capacity and individually andon behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,v.FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, a national bankinginstitution, et al., Defendants-Appellees.Appeal of Patricia Starrels BERNSTEIN, as Legatee of JoelStarrels, deceased, individually, and in aderivative capacity, and on behalf ofall others similarly situated.<

295 Md. 472 (1983) 456 A.2d 1283 THE CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. THE BARLOW CORPORATION [No. 54, September Term, 1982.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided March 3, 1983. The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ. Sidney G. Leech and Anthony Ci

Herrmann, J.; The petition seeks a rule to show cause why a judgment entered by confession against the petitioners and in favor of the respondent should not be opened and vacated. It is alleged that the judgment was entered upon a promissory note with warrant of attorney bearing the petitioners’ signatures as makers and endorsed to the respondent by the payee. The petitioners allege that they should be relieved from the judg

DAWKINS, District Judge. On November 3, 1928, the Bank of Commerce & Trust Company of Memphis, Tenn., and T. W. Vinton filed in this court, as trustees of a certain bond mortgage upon a large sawmill plant, timber lands, etc., a bill for foreclosure via ordinaria, and for the appointment of a receiver. Both the maker of the mortgage and bonds, Willetts Wood Products Company, a Delaware corporation, and the guarantor of the