Cases

[Cite as Pugh v. Capital One Bank USA N.A., 2021-Ohio-994.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) JAMES S. PUGH C.A. No. 20CA011643 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED

445 F.Supp.2d 899 (2006) Charles WAGNER, Plaintiff, v. MERIT DISTRIBUTION, et al., Defendants. No. 04-2696 B. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. August 10, 2006. *900 *901 Charles A. Sevier, James E. King, Jr., Eskins King, PC, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff. Jo

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 24, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D14-3114 Lower Tribunal No. 10-3055 ________________ OneWest Bank, FSB, App

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO SEVER BETH BLOOM, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs Sarah Alhassid and Sarah Drennan’s (“Plaintiffs”) Second Amended Class Action Complaint, ECF No. [73] (“SAC”), filed by Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Nationstar” and Nationst

[Cite as Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Thomas, 2025-Ohio-4856.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Deutsche Bank National Trust : Company, : Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 24AP-350 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17CV-011198) Susan

[Cite as Campbell v. Licking Hts. Local School Dist., 2019-Ohio-2733.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STEPHEN A. CAMPBELL JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellant Hon. John W. Wise, J.

[Cite as Galloway v. Galloway, 2017-Ohio-87.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103837 MARK GALLOWAY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. MICHAEL

[Cite as In re Dissolution of Marriage of Mongkollugsana, 2023-Ohio-25.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF THE : DISSOLUTION OF THE MARRIAGE : OF: : C.A. No. 2022-CA-15

[Cite as Fifth Third Mtge. Co. v. Brown, 2012-Ohio-2205.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97450 FIFTH THIRD MORTGAGE COMPANY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals concern defendants’ participation in a deadly drug conspiracy. A grand jury indicted Walee Al-Din, Mustafa Al-Din, Charles Lewis, Sr., Ralphael Crenshaw, Demetris Kline, Nicholas Brown, and Dion Lanier for various offenses relating to their involvement in a conspiracy to possess and distribute marijuana, cocaine, and cocaine base. Kline, Brown, and Lanier entered plea agreem

327 F.Supp.2d 8 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc. et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A.99-2496 GK. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 9, 2004. *9 Sharon Yvette Eubanks, Renee Brooker, Stephen Dudley Brody, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARGDA PIERRE-NOEL, on behalf of her minor child K.N., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-00070 (TNM) BRIDGES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is about who must ensure that a disabled ch

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, World Harvest Church ("WHC") and Richard Vaughan, appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of plaintiffs-appellees, Michael Faieta, Lacey Faieta, and their minor son, A.F. Because *Page 2 (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its evidentiary rulings, (2) the general verdict forms and interrogatories

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELAWARE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ) C.A. No. 2018-0029-JTL LITIGATION ) COUNTY TRACK OPINION Date Submitted: January 17, 2020 Date Decided: May 8, 2020 Richard H. Morse, COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCIETY, INC., Wilmington, Delaware; Karen Lantz, ACLU FOUNDATION OF DELAWARE, INC., Wilmington, Delaware; Sa

ORDER AND REASONS STANWOOD R. DUVAL, JR., District Judge. Before the Court are the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, R. Doc. 39, and Defendant’s and ' Intervenors’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment, R. Doc. 40. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment present a challenge to a Louisiana statute as being constitutionally preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), 49 Stat

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY joined. Judge HUDSON wrote a dissenting opinion. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge. For over two centuries of growth and struggle, peace and war, the Constitution has secured our freedom through the guarantee that, in the United States, no one will be deprived of liberty without due process of law. Yet more than

MEMORANDUM OPINION KESSLER, District Judge. Defendant British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited (“BATCo”) has filed a Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Compliance with Order No. 343 (“Compliance Motion”). The United States opposes the Compliance Motion and has filed a Cross Motion for a Finding of Contempt Against BATCo and for Imposition of Continuing Monetary Sanctions (“Cross Motion”

130 F.Supp.2d 847 (2001) Stephen R. EBER, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Defendant. No. CIV. A. H-99-3450. United States District Court, S.D. Texas. February 1, 2001. *848 *849 *850 Keith Lovelace, Attorney at Law, Houston, TX, for Stephen R

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu