Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ball v. Riddle School District No. 70”
Ball v. LeBlancpublic domain
RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On August 5, 2013, this matter came before the Court for a non-jury trial on the merits and a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 12).1 Having considered the parties pretrial and post-trial submissions, the evidence introduced at the trial, and the arguments present
Walker v. San Francisco Unified School Districtpublic domain
741 F.Supp. 1386 (1990) Albert C. WALKER; Roberta Walker, Leon Ilnicki; Juanita Ilnicki, John C. Soso; Jacklyn C. Soso; Margaret Smith, Alyce Crosdale, and Betty Sands, Plaintiffs, v. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, City and County of San Francisco, State of California; Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California; Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Franc
ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Quinn v. Board of Educationpublic domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order Elaine E. Bucldo, United States District Judge In this action, a group of registered voters in the City of Chicago, several of whom are parents or grandparents of Chicago Public Schools students and/or have served on Local School Councils (“LSCs”), challenge Section 34-3 of the Illinois School Code, 105 ILCS 5/34-3, also known as the Chicago School Reform Amendatory Act of 1995.
Dash v. Board of Educationpublic domain
ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction... 380 II. Facts... 381 III. Procedural History... 383 IV. Law... 383 A. Standard of Review... 383 B. Statute of Limitations... 384 C. Doctrine of Waiver and Release. .. 385<
MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge. View Point Medical Systems, LLC (“View Point”), plaintiff, brought suit against athenahealth, Inc. (“Athena”), defendant, alleging six claims: fraud in the inducement (Count I); breach of contract (Count II); two claims of intentional breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Counts III and IV); tortious interference with prospec
Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch Partnershippublic domain
Justice LEE, dissenting: T 36 As the court today indicates, the statutory term "mineral deposits" is sometimes used narrowly to refer to solid mineral ores and sometimes used broadly to encompass oil and gas reserves. The question presented in this case is which of these two meanings to ascribe to that term as it appears in the eminent domain statute, Utah Code section 78B-6-501(6). I respectfully dissent fro
Trunzo v. Citi Mortgagepublic domain
OPINION MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge. Before the Court are the latest two motions filed in the extensive three-year litigation of this case: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 173; and (2) Defendant Phelan, Hallinan, and Schmieg, LLP’s (“PHS”) Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 175, which relates to this Court’s June 2012 ruling on PHS’s motion to dism
Nelson v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER FERNANDO J. GAITAN, JR., District Judge. I. BACKGROUND On October 14, 1999, Keith Nelson was charged with interstate kidnapping resulting in death and interstate travel with intent to engage in a sexual act with a child under the age of twelve. On October 25, 2001, Nelson entered a plea of guilty to count one and proceeded to the penalty phase of the trial. On November 13, 20
Fernandez v. UBS AGpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, United States District Judge. Contents I. Background... 365 A. The Funds... 365 B. The Parties... 365 1. Plaintiffs... 365 2. The UBS Defendants... 366 3. The Popular Defendants... 366 4. The Individual Defendants... 367</
Graham v. Dall. Area Rapid Transitpublic domain
Sam A. Lindsay, United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15), filed January 19, 2016. After considering the motion, response, reply, appendixes, record, and applicable law, and for the reasons that follow, the court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' Motion for Summ
Taylor v. Republic Services Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the five-day non-jury trial of Plaintiff Jennifer Taylor’s claims against Defendants Republic Services, Inc., Republic Services of Virginia, LLC, Jason Callaway, Ronald Krall, Douglas Murphy, Christopher Rains and Daniel E. Jameson for hostile work environment and retaliatory discharge pursuant to Title VII o
Collins v. Compass Group, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. RALLON, District Judge. This case involves claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Alabama Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 18). On June 14, 2013, the magistrate judge assigned this case entered a Report and Rec
Kisor v. Wilkiepublic domain
Justice KAGAN announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II-B, III-B, and IV, and an opinion with respect to Parts II-A and III-A, in which Justice GINSBURG, Justice BREYER, and Justice SOTOMAYOR join. *2408 This Court has often deferred to
Cohlmia v. St. John Medical Centerpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, Chief Judge. Before the court is Magistrate Judge T. Lane Wilson’s Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 536] on the Motion for Attorney Fees [Dkt. # 458] filed by defendants St. John Medical Center, William Howard Aired, M.D. and William Burnett, M.D. (collectively, “St. John”). Magistrate Judge Wilson concluded the claims of plaintiffs George S. Cohlmia, Jr
Gianinna Gallardo v. Mary Mayhewpublic domain
Case: 17-13693 Date Filed: 06/26/2020 Page: 1 of 61 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17-13693 D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cv-00116-MW-CAS GIANINNA GALLARDO, an incapacitated person, by and through her parents and co-guardians Pilar Vassallo and Walter Gallardo,
Gianinna Gallardo v. Mary Mayhewpublic domain
Case: 17-13693 Date Filed: 06/26/2020 Page: 1 of 61 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17-13693 D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cv-00116-MW-CAS GIANINNA GALLARDO, an incapacitated person, by and through her parents and co-guardians Pilar Vassallo and Walter Gallardo,
Gianinna Gallardo v. Mary Mayhewpublic domain
Case: 17-13693 Date Filed: 06/26/2020 Page: 1 of 61 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17-13693 D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cv-00116-MW-CAS GIANINNA GALLARDO, an incapacitated person, by and through her parents and co-guardians Pilar Vassallo and Walter Gallardo,
Estate of Williams v. City of Milwaukeepublic domain
ORDER J. P. Stadtmueller, U.S. District Judge 1. INTRODUCTION This action arises from the death of Derek Williams, Jr. (‘Williams”) on July 6, 2011 while in the custody of the City of Milwaukee Police Department (“MPD”). See (Docket #1). Plaintiffs, Williams’ estate and surviving minor children, have sued the City of Milwaukee (the “City”) and various police officers whom they
Stephanie Montagne Zoanni v. Lemuel David Hoganpublic domain
Opinion issued December 28, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00584-CV ——————————— STEPHANIE MONTAGNE ZOANNI, Appellant V. LEMUEL DAVID HOGAN, Appellee