⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Bales v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company”

District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013-04-18 · Published · cited 6× · 940 F. Supp. 2d 172; 56 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2793; 2013 WL 1694445; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55539
OPINION RODRIGUEZ, Senior District Judge. This case concerns the tragic death of Mr. Terry Riggs. Plaintiff Argia Riggs, Mr. Riggs’ wife, brought this suit pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., challenging Defendant Metropolitan *174Life Insurance Company’s (“MetLife”) denial of her ap
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
07-17-00458CV ACCEPTED SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 3/23/2018 4:00 PM Vivian Long, Clerk APPELLATE NO. 07-17-00458-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 7th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTAMARILLO, TEXAS
District Court, D. Maryland · 2017-01-17 · Published · cited 4× · 229 F. Supp. 3d 365; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5889; 2017 WL 167834
MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge When the Plaintiff, Colonel Robert Gary, made a claim for benefits under a life insurance policy (the “Policy”) that Defendant USAA Life Insurance Co. (“USAA Life”) had issued to his wife Angela Maddox-Gary less than two years earlier, USAA Life denied his claim because Ms. Maddox-Gary had made a misrepresentation in the medical questionnaire
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-06-10 · Published · cited 22× · 474 S.W.3d 660; 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 457; 2015 WL 3612989
OPINION BRANDON 0. GIBSON, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., and THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., joined. This appeal involves the interpretation of an insurance policy in order to determine whether the policy provided coverage for damage caused by arson. The insurer an
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002-09-11 · Published · cited 6× · 55 Mass. App. Ct. 789; 774 N.E.2d 1128; 2002 Mass. App. LEXIS 1160
Kafker, J. The case arises out of injuries sustained by defendant Patricia A. Slavin on May 17, 1999, during the loading of a pick-up track owned by defendant William Santos, Jr., and insured by plaintiff Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Metropolitan). While Santos operated a hydraulic lift at the Plymouth town wharf, Slavin was hit in the mouth with three 100-pound totes of fish as she stood behind t
District Court, C.D. California · 2009-08-05 · Published · cited 0× · 640 F. Supp. 2d 1224; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72208
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW STEPHEN G. LARSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on administrative review. Plaintiff Karien Holifield 1 worked as a controller at KJC Operating Company (“KJC”) through July 25, 2002, when she stopped working based upon her doctor’s advice and a variety of symptoms associated with epidemic neuromyasthenia, also known as
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005-02-15 · Published · cited 48× · 226 F.R.D. 207; 2005 WL 357424
*213AMENDED OPINION3 LINARES, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction....................................................................214 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law...........................................215 I. Background Page....
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2000-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 12 Mass. L. Rptr. 474
Connolly, J. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) moved for summary judgment requesting a declaration and order from the court that it has no obligation to provide insurance benefits to or for defendant Patricia A. Slavin (“Slavin”) on an automobile policy held by defendant William Santos, Jr. (“Santos”) pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56. The defendan
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938-01-03 · Published · cited 0× · 11 N.E.2d 1006; 105 Ind. App. 364; 1938 Ind. App. LEXIS 102
This action was originally instituted in the Circuit Court of Delaware County, Indiana, was transferred to the Delaware Superior Court, and from there was taken on a change of venue to the Jay Circuit Court, where the case was tried. Appellee Nettie K. George has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and directs our attention to the fact that the cause was transferred from the Delaware Circuit Court to the Delaware Superior Court without a transcript having first been made of the proceedings
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014-04-02 · Published · cited 23× · 999 F. Supp. 2d 1235; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46326; 2014 WL 1338088
ORDER ON MOTIONS RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Plaintiff (Dkt. # 142), Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants (Dkt. # 145), and Motion for Reconsideration by Plaintiff (Dkt. # 197). On February 14, 2014, the Court denied Plaintiffs claim to exclude her group disability insurance application from evidence and deferred
District Court, D. Maryland · 2016-06-28 · Published · cited 5× · 192 F. Supp. 3d 601; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183482
MEMORÁNDUM James K. Bredar, United States -District Judge Andrew Weisner (“Plaintiff”) brought an action against Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Defendant”), pursuant to section 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), seeking to recover long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits. Now pending before the Court are cross-moti
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991-02-07 · Published · cited 110× · 924 F.2d 698; 133 A.L.R. Fed. 591; 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1572; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1689; 1991 WL 12283
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. A.D. Huesing Corp. furnished its employees with medical care under a group health policy issued by Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. (CIGNA). The master policy covers 80% of specified expenses, and the employee must put up the other 20%. Co-payments sensitize employees to the costs of health care, leading them not only to use less but also to seek
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009-04-01 · Published · cited 71× · 561 F.3d 74; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6913; 2009 WL 839924
561 F.3d 74 (2009) SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Raul TORRES, Defendant, Appellant, Carrabassett Trading Company, Ltd., Defendant. No. 06-2730. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 4, 2007. Decided April 1, 2009. *75 Ross Anneberg, with whom Ellis Law Offices w
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1963-02-12 · Published · cited 6× · 119 N.W.2d 768; 254 Iowa 1215; 1963 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 644
Thompson, J. — The plaintiffs are beneficiaries in a policy of insurance issued by the defendant upon the life of their son, LeRoy Leo Bill, who died on January 12, 1961. Liability being denied by the insurer, this action was brought by the plaintiffs. *1217The defendant alleged that the death of the insured was the result of' suicide, which raises the only substantial
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941-02-27 · Published · cited 4× · 13 S.E.2d 741; 64 Ga. App. 620
The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial. DECIDED FEBRUARY 27, 1941. REHEARING DENIED MARCH 26, 1941. 1. This is the second appearance of this case in this court. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Daniel,61 Ga. App. 90 (5 S.E.2d 681). Under the terms of the policy sued on, the liability of the company attached if the insured became "totally and permanent
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939-11-15 · Published · cited 5× · 5 S.E.2d 681; 61 Ga. App. 90; 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 225
The charge of the court complained of and set out in ground 5 of the amended motion for new trial was as follows: "The contract upon which the suit is based is in evidence. One of the provisions in the policy stipulates that upon receipt at the home office of due proof of any employee, while insured, prior to his sixtieth birthday, becomes totally and permanently disabled, as the result of bodily injury, that the company will pay $51.04 to the employee per month, and that such monthly payment
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944-08-04 · Published · cited 27× · 15 N.W.2d 487; 218 Minn. 273; 1944 Minn. LEXIS 484
1 Reported in 15 N.W.2d 487. Defendant issued to plaintiff's husband, Reinhold B. Kundiger, two weekly-premium or industrial life insurance policies, providing *Page 276 for double indemnity for death by accidental means, subject to certain limitations. Plaintiff brought suit on the policies after her husband's death and recovered a verdict for bot
Supreme Court of Vermont · 1935-07-15 · Published · cited 13× · 180 A. 649; 107 Vt. 367; 1935 Vt. LEXIS 187
The plaintiff is the beneficiary under a policy of accident insurance, issued by the defendant, insuring her late husband, James H. Griswold, against "the results of bodily injuries sustained while this policy is in force and caused directly and independently of all other causes by violent and accidental means," and providing also that the policy should not cover death caused wholly or partly by infection "excepting only septic infection of and through a visible wound caused directly and inde
Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989-09-18 · Published · cited 52× · 779 P.2d 1317; 13 Brief Times Rptr. 1131; 1989 Colo. LEXIS 288; 1989 WL 106407
Justice LOHR delivered the Opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari to review the judgment of the Colorado Court of Appeals in Maurer v. Young Life, 751 P.2d 653 (Colo.App.1987). The issues presented in this case are whether the Property Tax Administrator of the State of Colorado (Administrator) has standing to appeal from a ruling of the Board of Assessment Appeals (Board) granting an applicatio
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966-01-20 · Published · cited 21× · 147 S.E.2d 5; 113 Ga. App. 17; 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 948
113 Ga. App. 17 (1966) 147 S.E.2d 5 SASSER v. COASTAL STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. 41705. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued January 10, 1966. Decided January 20, 1966. *19 W. T. Mobley, for appellant. Thurmond, Hester, Jolles & McElmurray, Isaac S. Jolles, for