⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Bakst v. Kelly”

Gross v. Bakstpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 212 A.D. 824
Final order setting aside special verdict in favor of Max Bakst, and granting a new trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event. No opinion. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jayeox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ.
Altman v. Bakstpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 212 A.D. 822
Final order setting aside special verdict in favor of Max Bakst, and granting a new trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event. No opinion. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ.
Gross v. Bakstpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925-02-15 · Published · cited 0× · 212 A.D. 881
Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jayeox, Kelby and Young, JJ.
Gross v. Bakstpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 206 A.D. 677
Motion for stay denied. Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ.
Markowitz v. Bakstpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925-06-15 · Published · cited 0× · 214 A.D. 803
Judgment dismissing complaint affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., and Rich, J., dissent.
Gross v. Bakstpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 206 A.D. 679
Order denying motion to vacate and set aside notice of examination of defendant before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice fixing time and place of examination.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1985-11-12 · Published · cited 5× · 55 B.R. 157; 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 4990
55 B.R. 157 (1985) In re AIR CONDITIONING, INC. OF STUART, Debtor(s). AMERICAN BANK OF MARTIN COUNTY, Plaintiff, v. LEASING SERVICE CORPORATION, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 84-01395-BKC-TCB, Adv. No. 85-0965-BKC-TCB-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. November 12, 1985. *158 Harvin & Geary and Samuel S. Sorota,
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2008-01-28 · Published · cited 6× · 415 B.R. 612; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 4218
415 B.R. 612 (2008) In re Warren C. McDOWELL, Debtor(s). Judith Stein and David S.J. Neufeld, Plaintiff(s), v. Warren C. McDowell, Defendant(s). Bankruptcy No. 07-11728-BKC-PGH. Adversary No. 07-1564-BKC-PGH-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, West Palm Beach Division. January 28, 2008. *613 Heather L. Ries, Esq.
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2024-12-26 · Published · cited 0×
SUPERIOR COURT FBT EVERETT REALTY, LLC v. MASSACHUSETTS GAMING COMMISSION v. WYNN MA, LLC Docket: 1881CV00304-B Dates: December 12, 2024 Present:<
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988-05-17 · Published · cited 86× · 845 F.2d 293; 18 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 973; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6506; 17 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1385
VANCE, Circuit Judge: This bankruptcy appeal involves an un-dersecured creditor’s attempt to obtain the proceeds of a $20,000 certificate of deposit used to secure a letter of credit issued in favor of the creditor. Both the bankruptcy court and the district court held that there had been a preference, and the district court ordered the creditor to deliver the
District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987-03-10 · Published · cited 7× · 72 B.R. 657; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8495
72 B.R. 657 (1987) In re AIR CONDITIONING, INC. OF STUART, Debtor. LEASING SERVICE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Douglass E. WENDEL, as trustee for Air Conditioning, Inc. of Stuart, and American Bank of Martin County, Appellees. Bankruptcy Nos. 86-8006-CIV-NESBITT, 84-01395-BKC-TCB and 85-0965-BKC-TCB-A. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. March 10, 1987. <
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014-08-11 · Published · cited 2× · 515 B.R. 699
ORDER W. HOMER DRAKE, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by James R. Fulford (hereinafter “Fulford”) and SRH Holding Company, LLC (hereinafter “SRH” and, collectively with Fulford, the “Defendants”). The Motion arises in connection with a complaint (hereinafter the. “Complaint”) to avoid and recover an allegedly fraudulent transfer, filed by Griffin Howell
Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2018-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
134 Nev., Advance Opinion 4 61 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JAPONICA GLOVER-ARMONT, No. 70988 Appellant, vs. JOHN CARGILE; AND CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, A MUNICIPAL RLED CORPORATION EXIS
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-07-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NV 49
134 Nev., Advance Opinion 4 61 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JAPONICA GLOVER-ARMONT, No. 70988 Appellant, vs. JOHN CARGILE; AND CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, A MUNICIPAL RLED CORPORATION EXIS
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2019-05-29 · Published · cited 25× · 249 Cal. Rptr. 3d 122; 36 Cal. App. 5th 766
SEGAL, J. *129*773INTRODUCTION These appeals arise from a dispute concerning a television production based on the life of the Mexican-American celebrity Jenni Rivera, who died in a plane crash in December 2012. The entit
California Court of Appeal · 2019-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/29/19; Certified for publication 6/25/19 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN JENNI RIVERA ENTERPRISES, LLC, B279739 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC633764) v. LATIN WORLD ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC. et al., D
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 2016-04-19 · Published · cited 3× · 550 B.R. 482
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SHON HASTINGS, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Chapter 7 Trustee Gene W. Doeling filed an adversary complaint seeking to avoid prepetition transfers from Debtor Roger K. O’Neill to Defendant Theresa C. O’Neill. Specifically, the Trustee asserts Debtor’s real estate transfers to Defendant pursuant to their divorce Settlement Agreement were preferentia
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999-12-27 · Published · cited 0× · 245 B.R. 361; 43 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1496; 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1805
MEMORANDUM OPINION ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. The Chapter 7 trustee Fred Moon (the trustee) filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment to determine the rights to a payment in the amount of $20,000.00. The *363parties filed Stipulated Facts and Briefs in support of their respective positions, and consent to decision based on th
In Re Heneburypublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2007-03-16 · Published · cited 52× · 361 B.R. 595; 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 343; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 825
361 B.R. 595 (2007) In re Mark Andrew HENEBURY and Yvette Joan Henebury, Debtors. No. 06-13354-BKC-PGH. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, West Palm Beach Division. March 16, 2007. *596 *597 Stuart A. Young, West Palm Beach, FL, for Debtors. Michael R. Bakst, West Palm Beach, FL, for
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988-10-26 · Published · cited 12× · 549 A.2d 231; 378 Pa. Super. 623; 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3144
KELLY, Judge: In this case, we are called upon to determine whether an appellant’s pre-arrest refusal to explain his appearance at a state police barracks with a dead body and the murder weapon in his automobile may be admitted into evidence, and whether appellant’s post-arrest refusal to submit to a neutron activation test to determine whether he had recently fired a gun may be admitted into evidence. Despite appellant’s obje