Cases

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ) HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ) OPERATING, LLC, and ) BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

656 F.Supp.2d 226 (2009) Janet BAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-10053-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 15, 2009. *228 Terence K. Ankner, The Law offices of Partridge, Ankner & Horstmann, LLP, Boston, MA, Alan K. Cotler, Steven T. Voigt

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. In January 2012, Heela Mining Company (“Hecla” or the “Company”) issued a press release lowering its projections for silver production, and the United States Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued a press release noting *6that Hecla had been cited for numerous safety violations. Within weeks, tw

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE WAL-MART STORES, INC. CONSOLIDATED DELAWARE DERIVATIVE C.A. No. 7455-CB LITIGATION MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 3, 2016 Date Decided: May 13, 2016 Stuart M. Grant, Michael J. Barry and Nathan A. Cook, GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Christine S. Azar and Ryan T. Keating, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilm

(2008) In re KEITHLEY INSTRUMENTS, INC., DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates To: All Actions. Case No. 1:06CV2171. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 21, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SARA LIOI, District Judge. This is a shareholders' derivative action. Before the Court are two motions to dismiss Plainti

BERGER, Justice: In this appeal we consider whether the Court of Chancery was required to dismiss a Delaware derivative complaint after a California federal court entered a final judgment dismissing essentially the same complaint brought by different stockholders. The trial court held that it was not required to give preclusive effect to the California judgment for two reasons. First, the Court of Chancery held, as a matter

*59 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS SAYLOR, District Judge. This lawsuit involves a dispute between the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and a federally recognized Indian tribe concerning regulatory jurisdiction over civil gaming on Indian lands on Martha’s Vineyard. The Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) and related entities have t

941 A.2d 1020 (2007) Jan BRANDIN, Plaintiff, v. Darwin DEASON, Jeffrey A. Rich, Mark A. King, Joseph O'Neill, Frank Rossi, Lynn R. Blodgett, David W. Black, Henry Hortenstine, Peter A. Bracken, William L. Deckelman, Jr., Warren Edwards, John M. Brophy, John Rexford, Dennis McCuistion, J. Livingston Kosberg and Clifford M. Kendall, Defendants, and Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Nominal Defendant. C.A. No. 2123-VCL.</

VALIHURA, Justice: The Court of Chancery initially found that Wal-Mart stockholders who were attempting to prosecute derivative claims in Delaware could no longer do so because another court, a federal court in Arkansas, had reached a final judgment on the issue of demand futility first, and the stockholders were adequately represented in that action. But the derivative plaintiffs

914 A.2d 636 (2006) WEST COAST MANAGEMENT & CAPITAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CARRIER ACCESS CORPORATION, Defendant. C.A. No. 2262-N. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: October 20, 2006. Decided: November 14, 2006. *638 Joseph A. Rosenthal, Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A., Wilmingto

654 F.Supp.2d 1349 (2009) Robert LEWIS and Sutter Capital Management, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. James M. SENEFF, Jr.; Robert A. Bourne; CNL Realty Corporation; and FF-TSY Holding Company II, LLC, formerly known as Trustreet Properties, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 6:07-cv-1245-Orl-22DAB. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division.

534 F.Supp.2d 1248 (2007) In re FARO TECHNOLOGIES SECURITIES LITIGATION. Lead Case No. 6:05-cv-1810-Orl-22DAB. Member Cases Nos. 6:06-cv-8-Orl-22DAB, 6:06-cv-16-Or1-22DAB, 6:06-cv-57-Or1-22DAB. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. September 18, 2007. *1249 *1250

500 F.Supp.2d 1290 (2007) SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., Plaintiff, v. VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. and Vonage America, Inc., Defendants. No. 05-2433-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 7, 2007. *1291 *1292 *1293

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff William M. McDermott (“plaintiff’), a resident of the Pondview condominiums in Lynn, Massachusetts, filed this action alleging improper debt collection activities against defendant Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C. (“MEEB” or “defendant”), a professional corporation of attorneys located in Braintree, Massachusetts. The t

241 F.Supp.2d 281 (2002) In re: INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 21 MC 92(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 19, 2003. *290 Melvyn I. Weiss, Robert Wallner, Ariana J. Tadler, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, New York, NY, Stanley Bernstein, Robert Berg, Bernstein Liebhard & Lifsh