Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT H. ODELL, JR.; ROBERT No. 19-15262 ODELL, M.D., PH.D. MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, A Nevada D.C. No. Corporation, 2:15-cv-01793- Plaintiffs-Appellees, RFB-GWF v. OPINION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES; XAVIER BECERRA, Defendants-Appel

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 27, 2025 Decided August 1, 2025 No. 24-5098 RED LAKE BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, A FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE, APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [532 U. S. 955] denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ******************** * JOSEPH MICHAEL D’ANGIOLINI, * No. 99-578V * Special Master Christian J. Moran Petitioner, * * Filed: March 27, 2014 v. * * hepatitis B vaccine; yeast allergy;

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [532 U. S. 955] denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.

ORDER LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Jonathan Baker moves for reconsideration of the court’s March 24, 2004 order dismissing his petition for review for failure to file a brief. Baker states that he has retained new counsel. Patricia Finn, Esq. submits an entry of appearance on behalf of Baker. However, an entry of appearance cannot be filed until counsel becomes a member of this co

ROVNER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The court’s holding in these cases is as remarkable for its reasoning as for its result. The Kortes and the Grotes are business owners: Korte & Luitjohan Contractors is a construction firm, and Grote Industries manufactures motor vehicle turn signals, reflectors, emergency lighting, and other safety systems. Neither company has a declared religious purpose or mission. Bot

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1820 ____________ BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO., Appellant v. SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; CENTER

PER CURIAM: Laurene Baker appeals from the order of the trial court denying her motion for attorney’s fees as provided by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. *235A brief statement of the case reveals that Ms. Baker had filed a claim in 1979 which had been denied administratively by the Secretary. This denial had been affirmed by the d

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ante, p. 833; ante, p. 834; ante, p. 837; ante, p. 843; ante, p. 854; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 879; ante, p. 880; ante, p. 884; ante, p. 904; ante, p. 967; ante, p. 90

ante, p. 833; ante, p. 834; ante, p. 837; ante, p. 843; ante, p. 854; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 879; ante, p. 880; ante, p. 884; ante, p. 904; ante, p. 967; ante, p. 90

RONEY, Chief Judge: This is an appeal of a final decision of the Secretary denying children’s benefits under the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C.A. § 416(h)(2)(A). We affirm the denial of benefits concerning the 1979 application. We reverse the district court’s determination concerning benefits granted in 1985, however, on the ground that the Secretary improperly reopened a prior award of benefits. The fact

ON MOTION CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. ORDER The Secretary of Health and Human Services moves to dismiss Jonathan Baker’s appeal of the decision of a Special Master in Baker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, No. 99-653V (Sept. 26, 2003). Baker has not responded to the motion to dismiss but moves for an extension of time to file his brief. B

ORDER The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

OPINION and ORDER FUTEY, Judge. This pro se vaccine case is before the court on petitioner’s motion for review of the special master’s decision denying entitlement to compensation. Petitioner asserts that the special master’s decision was based on information improperly obtained through inde*670pendent research outside the scope

ELMORE, Judge. Lachey Baker (plaintiff) appeals from an order of summary judgment in favor of Jeffrey Gibbons, M.D., Garon R. Strong, PA-C, and Sandhills Emergency Physicians, P.A. (collectively, defendants), on plaintiff's negligence claim. We affirm. I. Background On 14 January 2011 at approximately 10:30 p.m., plaintiff brought her eleven-year-old son, David,1

880 F.2d 319 26 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 292, Unempl.Ins.Rep. CCH 14850ALaurene BAKER on Behalf of Melinda BAKER, Hosie Baker, Jr.Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Louis SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services,Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-3113. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug. 10, 1989.